Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-9xpg2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-06T14:02:01.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Europe's Representation: A Symbolic Interpretation of Rejecting theConstitution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2008

Natascha Zowislo-Grünewald
Natascha Zowislo-Grünewald
Affiliation:
University of Bayreuth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The lack of enthusiasm for the European Union and its proposed constitution among theEuropean people surprised the political elite of Europe. Codifying common beliefs and valuesseemed to be a good way to represent the European identity in written form. The signing ofthe constitutional treaty should have become an important symbolic act, demonstrating thewillingness of the people to bond together. Instead, a so-called Reform Treaty was passed inLisbon in 2007 (to be ratified by all member states by 2009) that specifically abandoned anyallusion to symbolic forms of European representation such as the term constitution, the flag, or a European anthem.

Information

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 41 , Issue 3 , July 2008 , pp. 551 - 555
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Akerlof, G. 1970. “The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 (3): 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BBC News. 2005. “What Does Dutch ‘No’ Vote Mean?” June 2. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/talking_point/4597413.stm.Google Scholar
Berezin, Mabel. 2006. “Appropriating the ‘No’: The French National Front, the Vote on the Constitution, and the ‘New’ April 21.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (April): 269–72.Google Scholar
Beste, Ralf, and Hammerstein, Konstantin von. 2007. “Koalition der Willigen.” Der Spiegel 25, 26–7.Google Scholar
Breuilly, John. 1994. “Approaches to Nationalism.” In Formen des Nationalen Bewusstseins im Lichte Zeitgenössischer Nationalismustheorien, ed. Schmidt-Hartmann, Eva. Munich: Oldenbourg, 15–38Google Scholar
Capital. 2007. “Europa erfindet sich neu.” (January): 53–7.Google Scholar
Castles, Stephan. 2005. “Hierarchical Citizenship in a World of Unequal Nation-States.” PS: Political Science and Politics 38 (October): 689–92.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1988. “Social Capital in Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94 (Supplement): 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Belkap Press.Google Scholar
Delanty, Gerard. 1998. “Redefining Political Culture in Europe Today: From Ideology to the Politics of Identity and Beyond.” In Political Symbols, Symbolic Politics: European Identities in Transformation, ed. Ulf, Hedetoft. Aldershot: Ashgate, 23–43.Google Scholar
Edelmann, Murray. 1990. Politik als Ritual: Die Symbolische Funktion Staatlicher Institutionen und Politischen Handelns. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 1991. The Symbol Theory: Introduction to Elias' Work. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
European No Campaign. 2005a. “A Bad Deal for Britain.” London: European No Campaign. http://www.europeannocampaign.com.Google Scholar
European No Campaign. 2005b. A Federalist's Dream Comes True. London: European No Campaign. http://www.europeannocampaign.com/293.html.Google Scholar
Featherstone, Mike. 1995. Undoing Culture: Globalization, Postmodernism and Identity. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Gordon, Scott. 1999. Controlling the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanafin, Patrick, and Williams, Melissa S., eds. 1999. Identity, Rights and Constitutional Transformation. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Harrison, Simon. 1992. “Ritual as Intellectual Property.” Man 27 (2): 225–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Simon. 1995. “Four Types of Symbolic Conflict.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 1 (2): 255–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Simon. 1999. “Cultural Boundaries.” Anthropology Today 15 (5): 10–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Simon. 2002. “The Politics of Resemblance: Ethnicity, Trademarks, Head-Hunting.” The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 8 (2): 211–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedetoft, Ulf. 1998. “On Nationalisers and Europeanisers in Contemporary Europe: An Introduction.” In Political Symbols, Symbolic Politics: European Identities in Transformation, ed. Ulf, Hedetoft. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1–19.Google Scholar
Helle, Horst Jürgen. 1980. Soziologie und Symbol. Verstehende Theorie der Werte in Kultur und Gesellschaft. Berlin: Duncker und Homblot.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric, and Ranger, Terence, eds. 1983. Invention of Tradition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2006. “Europe's Blues: Theoretical Soul-Searching after the Rejecton of the European Constitution.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (April): 247–50.Google Scholar
Hülsse, Rainer. 2003. Metaphern der EU-Erweiterung als Konstruktionen europäischer Identität. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, Simon. 2005. “Q&A: The European Constitution.” The Guardian, June 2. http://www.guardian.co.uk/eu/story/0,,1482635,00.html.Google Scholar
Kuper, Adam. 1999. Culture: The Anthropologists' Account. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liszka, James Jakob. 1989. The Semiotic of Myth: A Critical Study of the Symbol. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Mikkeli, Heikki. 1998. Europe as an Idea and an Identity. London: MacMillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulvey, Stephen. 2005. “Varied Reasons behind Dutch ‘No.’” BBC News, June 1. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4601731.stm.Google Scholar
Rahner, Karl. 1963. “Repräsentation.” In Lexikon für Theologie und Kirche, ed. Höfer, Josef and Rahner, Karl. Vol. 8. Reprinted 1986. Freiburg, Germany: Herder, 1,244–5.Google Scholar
Sbragia, Alberta. 2006. “Introduction—The EU and Its ‘Constitution’: Public Opinion, Political Elites, and Their International Context.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (April): 237–40.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. 1995. Nations and Nationalism in a Global Era. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Soeffner, Hans-Georg. 1991. “Zur Soziologie des Symbols und des Rituals.” In Das Symbol: Brücke des Verstehens, ed. Oelkers, Jürgen and Wegenast, Klaus. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 63–81.Google Scholar
Spence, Michael. 1973. “Job Market Signaling.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 87 (3): 355–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, Michael. 2002. “Signaling in Retrospect and the Informational Structure of Markets.” American Economic Review 92 (3): 434–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1961. “The Economics of Information.” Journal of Political Economy 69 (3): 213–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tickner, Lisa. 1987. The Spectacle of Women: Imagery of the Suffrage Campaign 1907–14. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Van Tartwijk-Novey, Louise B. 1995. The European House of Cards: Towards a United States of Europe? Lenham, UK: St. Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhofstadt, Guy. 2003. “Europe Emancipates Itself.” The Wall Street Journal Europe, November 26.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H., and Wind, Marlene. 2003. European Constitutionalism beyond the State. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Stephen. 1998. Germany, Europe and the Persistence of Nations. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Zowislo, Natascha. 2000. Auf der Suche nach einer europäischen Identität: Symbole, Mythen und Geschichtsdidaktik im Diskurs über die europäische Integration. Mannheim: Mateo.Google Scholar