We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Information
Type
Symposium: Research and Undergraduate Teaching: A False Divide?
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
REFERENCES
Dahl, Robert. 1961. “The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest.” American Political Science Review55: 763–72.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1984. “Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics.” Comparative Politics16: 223–46.Google Scholar
Lane, Jan-Erik. 1987. “Behavioralism.” In Bogdanor, Vernon (ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Political Science. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert. 1985. “Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science.” American Political Science Review79: 293–304.Google Scholar
Tourangeau, Roger, and Smith, Tom W.. 1996. “Asking Sensitive Questions: The Impact of Data Collection Mode, Question Format, and Question Context.” Public Opinion Quarterly60 (2): 275–304.Google Scholar
Truman, David B. 1951. “The Implications of Political Behavior Research.” Item (Social Science Research Council).Google Scholar