Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-pf7kn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-23T11:49:59.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Good Representatives Foster Autonomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2018

Suzanne Dovi
Suzanne Dovi*
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: The Good Representative 2.0
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 323 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Ben-Porath, Sigal. 2010a. “Exit Rights and Entrance Paths: Accommodating Cultural Diversity in a Liberal Democracy.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (4): 1021–33.Google Scholar
Ben-Porath, Sigal. 2010b. Tough Choices: Structured Paternalism and the Landscape of Choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, Edmund. 1790 [1968]. Reflections on the Revolution in France. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Celis, Karen, Childs, Sarah, Kantola, Johanna, and Krook, Mona. 2008. “Rethinking Women’s Substantive Representation.” Representation 44 (2): 99–110.Google Scholar
Christman, John. 2008. “Autonomy in Moral and Political Philosophy.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Disch, Lisa. 2011. “Toward a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation.” American Political Science Review 5 (1): 100–114.Google Scholar
Dovi, Suzanne. 2009. “In Praise of Exclusion.” Journal of Politics 71 (3): 117.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala, and Weldon, Laurel. 2010. “When Do Governments Promote Women’s Rights? A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Sex Equality Policy.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 207–16.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. 1990. Making All the Difference. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 2004. “Defending Equality of Outcome.” London: LSE Research Online. Available at http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/archive.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hannah. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. “Research Frontier Essay: When Are Interests Interesting? The Problem of Political Representation of Women.” American Political Science Review 75 (03): 701–16.Google Scholar
Saward, Michael. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Severs, Eline. 2010. “Representation as Claims Making: Quid Responsiveness?” Representation 46 (4): 411–23.Google Scholar
Strolovitch, Dara. 2008. Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark. 2011. “Voting with Your Feet: Exit-Based Empowerment in Democratic Theory.” American Political Science Review 5 (4): 683–701.Google Scholar