We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Becker, Theorore L.1970. “Judicial Theory.” In Approaches to the Study of Political Science. Haas, Michael and Kariel, Henry S., eds. Scranton: Chandler Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Cook, Beverly B.1981. “Sunday Letters Home: Tensions between Affection and Convention.” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Cook, Beverly B.1984. “Early Women in Political Science: the Personal Side.” Paper delivered at annual meeting of Western Political Science Association, Sacramento, April 12–14.Google Scholar
Cook, Beverly B.1986. “Support for Academic Women in Political Science, 1890–1945.” Women and Politics6 (Fall 1986) 75–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
deGrazia, Alfred, and Ruttenberg, Charles L.. 1963. “Innovators in the Study of the Legal Process.” The American Behavioral Scientist7:48–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunardini, Christine A.1991. “Alice Paul, 1885–1977,” in Portraits of American Women. Barker-Benfield, G. J. and Clinton, Catherine, eds. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Rudder, C. E.1983. “The Quality of Graduate Education in Political Science.” PS16:48–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanley, Molly L., and Schuck, Victoria. 1974. “In Search of Political Woman.” Social Science Quarterly55:632–44.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert, and Tanenhaus, Joseph. 1964. American Political Science: A Profile of the Discipline. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
Somit, Albert, and Tanenhaus, Joseph. 1967. The Development of Political Science. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.Google Scholar