Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-h6jzd Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-02-19T02:49:09.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rejecting Assumptions about Desk Rejects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2021

Kathleen Dolan Open the ORCID record for Kathleen Dolan [Opens in a new window]  and
Jennifer L. Lawless Open the ORCID record for Jennifer L. Lawless [Opens in a new window]
Kathleen Dolan
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Jennifer L. Lawless
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium on Desk Rejections
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , October 2021 , pp. 682 - 685
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTE

1. Our desk-reject rate is comparable to that of previous AJPS editorial teams. Dating back to 2015, the annual percentage of manuscripts that received a desk rejection varied from 21% to 27%. The slow upward trend is far less dramatic than the 60% increase in sumbissions during the same period.