Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sq2k7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-12T17:26:40.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XVI.—Two Hologram Methods in Diffraction Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2012

G. L. Rogers
G. L. Rogers
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Victoria University College, Wellington, N.Z.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

The Bragg two-hologram method for eliminating the unwanted image in Diffraction Microscopy is here thoroughly examined. It is shown to be of general validity for objects containing both amplitude and phase-contrast terms.

Other two-hologram methods are briefly discussed. In principle any two sufficiently distinct holograms may be used, but the Bragg 2:1 focal ratio is the simplest. The pair of holograms at ±f is also of interest, since it allows moderate degrees of phase-contrast and amplitude-contrast terms in the original object to be separated. A “three-wavelength” technique for obtaining the Bragg records is briefly outlined.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 64 , Issue 2 , 1954 , pp. 209 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References to Literature

Bragg, W. L., and Rogers, G. L., 1951. Natur., 167, 190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buerger, M. J., 1950. J. Appl. Phys., 21, 909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coote, J. H., 1948. Making Colour Prints, pp. 71–79. Focal Press, London.Google Scholar
Gabor, D., 1948. Natur., 161, 777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabor, D., 1949. Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 197, 454.Google Scholar
Gabor, D., 1951 a. Proc. Phys. Soc., B, 64, 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabor, D., 1951 b.. Private communication.Google Scholar
Gabor, D., and Goss, W. P., 1956. [To be published.]Google Scholar
Haine, M. E., and Dyson, J., 1950. Natur., 166, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haine, M. E., and Mulvey, T., 1952. J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 42, 763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, G. L., 1952 a. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., A, 63, 193.Google Scholar
Rogers, G. L., 1952 b. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., A, 63, 313.Google Scholar
Salmon, J. T., 1951. The Microscope, March-April 1951.Google Scholar