Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-kp629 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T23:57:46.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Singular sets and the Lavrentiev phenomenon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2015

Richard Gratwick
Richard Gratwick*
Affiliation:
Mathematics Institute, Zeeman Building, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK, (r.gratwick@warwick.ac.uk)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We show that non-occurrence of the Lavrentiev phenomenon does not imply that the singular set is small. Precisely, given a compact Lebesgue null subset E ⊆ ℝ and an arbitrary superlinearity, there exists a smooth strictly convex Lagrangian with this superlinear growth such that all minimizers of the associated variational problem have singular set exactly E but still admit approximation in energy by smooth functions.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A: Mathematics , Volume 145 , Issue 3 , June 2015 , pp. 513 - 533
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Alberti, G. and Cassano, F. Serra. Non-occurrence of gap for one-dimensional autonomous functionals. In Proc. workshop: Calculus of Variations, Homogenization and Continuum Mechanics, 1993. Series on Advances in Mathematics for Applied Sciences, vol. 18, pp. 1–17 (World Scientific, 1994).Google Scholar
2 Ball, J. M. and Mizel, V. J.. One-dimensional variational problems whose minimizers do not satisfy the Euler–Lagrange equation. Arch. Ration. Mech. Analysis 90 (1985), 325–388.Google Scholar
3 Clarke, F. H. and Vinter, R. B.. Existence and regularity in the small in the calculus of variations. J. Diff. Eqns 59 (1985), 336–354.Google Scholar
4 Clarke, F. H. and Vinter, R. B.. Regularity properties of solutions to the basic problem in the calculus of variations. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 289 (1985), 73–98.Google Scholar
5 Csörnyei, M., Kirchheim, B., O’Neil, T. C., Preiss, D. and Winter, S.. Universal singular sets in the calculus of variations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Analysis 190 (2008), 371–424.Google Scholar
6 Davie, A. M.. Singular minimisers in the calculus of variations in one dimension. Arch. Ration. Mech. Analysis 101 (1988), 161–177.Google Scholar
7 Ferriero, A.. A direct proof of the Tonelli’s partial regularity result. Discrete Contin. Dynam. Syst. 32 (2012), 2089–2099.Google Scholar
8 Ferriero, A.. On the Tonelli’s partial regularity. Diff. Integ. Eqns 26 (2013), 1–9.Google Scholar
9 Gratwick, R. and Preiss, D.. A one-dimensional variational problem with continuous Lagrangian and singular minimizer. Arch. Ration. Mech. Analysis 202 (2011), 177–211.Google Scholar
10 Lavrentiev, M.. Sur quelques problèmes du calcul des variations. Annali Mat. Pura Appl. 4 (1926), 7–28.Google Scholar
11 Manià, B.. Sopra un essempio di Lavrentiev. Boll. UMI 13 (1934), 147–153.Google Scholar
12 Saks, S.. Theory of the integral. Monografie Matematyczne, vol. 7 (New York: Stechert, 1937).Google Scholar
13 Sychëv, M. A.. On the regularity of solutions of variational problems. Sb. Math. 75 (1993), 525–556.Google Scholar
14 Tonelli, L.. Sur un méthode directe du calcul des variations. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 39 (1915), 233–264.Google Scholar
15 Tonelli, L.. Fondamentica di Calcolo delle variazioni, vol. 2 (Bologna: Zanichelli, 1923).Google Scholar