Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sq2k7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-02T01:08:47.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Statistical Method for Detecting Gravitational Recoils of Supermassive Black Holes in Active Galactic Nuclei

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2017

P. Raffai*
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Hungary MTA-ELTE EIRSA ”Lendület” Astrophysics Research Group, 1117 Budapest, Hungary
B. Bécsy
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Hungary MTA-ELTE EIRSA ”Lendület” Astrophysics Research Group, 1117 Budapest, Hungary
Z. Haiman
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA
Z. Frei
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics, Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Hungary MTA-ELTE EIRSA ”Lendület” Astrophysics Research Group, 1117 Budapest, Hungary
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We propose an observational test for gravitationally recoiling supermassive black holes in active galactic nuclei, based on a positive correlation between the velocities of black holes relative to their host galaxies, |Δv|, and their obscuring dust column densities, Σdust, both measured along the line of sight. Our findings using a set of toy models implemented to a Monte Carlo simulation imply that models of the galactic centre and of recoil dynamics can be tested by future observations of the potential Σdust–|Δv| correlation. We have also found that the fraction of obscured quasars decreases with |Δv|, for which the predicted trend can be compared to the observed fraction of type II quasars, and can further test combinations of models we may implement.

References

Aller, M. C. & Richstone, D. 2002, AJ, 124, 3035 Google Scholar
Baker, J. G., et al. 2008, ApJ, 682, L29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blecha, L., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 961 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonning, E. W., Shields, G. A., & Salviander, S. 2007, ApJ, 666, L13 Google Scholar
Greig, B., et al. 2016, eprint arXiv:1605.09388Google Scholar
Healy, J., Lousto, C. O., & Zlochower, Y. 2014, PRD, 90, 104004 Google Scholar
Hönig, S. F. 2008, Dr. rer. nat. dissertation, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, BonnGoogle Scholar
Komossa, S. 2012, Adv. in Astr., 2012, 364973 Google Scholar
Ledoux, C., et al. 2015, A&A, 580, A8 Google Scholar
Leigh, N., Böker, T., & Knigge, C. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 2130 Google Scholar
Loeb, A. 2007, Phys. Rev. Lett., 99, id. 041103Google Scholar
Madau, P. & Quataert, E. 2004, ApJ, 606, L17 Google Scholar
Pâris, et al. 2016, eprint arXiv:1608.06483Google Scholar
Raffai, P., Haiman, Z., & Frei, Z. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 484 Google Scholar
Reynolds, C. S. 2013, CQG, 30, 244004 Google Scholar
Schartmann, M., et al. 2005, A&A, 437, 861 Google Scholar
Tanaka, T. & Haiman, Z. 2009, ApJ, 696, 1798 CrossRefGoogle Scholar