Hostname: page-component-5447f9dfdb-xmf2s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-29T06:04:18.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Integrated photometric redshifts and SED fitting as tool for galaxy evolution studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2013

Ralf Kotulla*
Affiliation:
Center for Gravitation, Cosmology, and Astrophysics, Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, 1900 E. Kenwood Blvd, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA email: kotulla@uwm.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Photometric redshifts, i.e. redshifts derived by comparing an observed spectral-energy distribution (SED) to a range of empirical or theoretical SED templates, are commonly used in studies of the high-redshift Universe. Often, the next step is to use these redshifts as fixed input parameters for SED fitting to derive physical properties for each galaxy. However, this two-step approach ignores degeneracies between redshift and, e.g., stellar mass. Here I present first results using an improved approach that integrates both methods. I find that mass determinations are, on average, three times more uncertain than they seem from the common two-step approach. If not accounted for, these underestimated uncertainties can impact our ability of making meaningful comparisons between observations and simulations of galaxy evolution.

References

Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., Kinney, A. L., Koornneef, J., & Storchi-Bergmann, T. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682Google Scholar
De Lucia, G. & Blaizot, J. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 2Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, H., Arnouts, S., Capak, P., et al. 2010, A&A, 523, A31Google Scholar
Ilbert, O., Capak, P., Salvato, M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 690, 1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotulla, R. & Fritze, U. 2009, MNRAS, 393, L55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotulla, R., Fritze, U., Weilbacher, P., & Anders, P. 2009, MNRAS, 396, 462Google Scholar
Lilly, S., Le Fèvre, O., Renzini, A., et al. 2007, ApJS, 172, 70Google Scholar
Madau, P. 1995, ApJ, 441, 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar