Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-rj9fg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-13T14:59:16.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imaging stellar surface features with optical interferometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2024

X. Haubois Open the ORCID record for X. Haubois [Opens in a new window]
X. Haubois*
Affiliation:
European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere (ESO), Casilla 19001, Santiago 19, Chile
*
email: xhaubois@eso.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this contribution, I present a selected overview of optical interferometry imaging results that brought insights on stellar activity and mass loss in evolved stars. I briefly introduce the STELLIM project that aims to characterize stellar surfaces and circumstellar environments by producing fast and reliable interferometric images.

Keywords

Convectiontechniques: interferometricstars: fundamental parameters
Type
Contributed Paper
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 19 , Symposium S365: Dynamics of Solar and Stellar Convection Zones and Atmospheres , December 2023 , pp. 24 - 26
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Aurière, M., Donati, J.-F., Konstantinova–Antova, R., et al. 2010, A&A, 516, L2 Google Scholar
Chiavassa, A., Haubois, X., Young, J. S., et al. 2010, A&A, 515, A12 Google Scholar
Climent, J. B., Wittkowski, M., Chiavassa, A., et al. 2020, A&A, 635, A160 Google Scholar
Cruzalèbes, P., Jorissen, A., Chiavassa, A., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 3277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haubois, X., Perrin, G., Lacour, S., et al. 2009, A&A, 508, 923 Google Scholar
Haubois, X., Schuhler, N., Bourget, P., et al. 2022, Proceedings of the SPIE conference, 12183, 121831T.Google Scholar
Höfner, S. 2008, A&A, 491, L1.Google Scholar
Josselin, E. & Plez, B. 2007, A&A, 469, 671.Google Scholar
Monnier, J. D., Berger, J.-P., Le Bouquin, J.-B., et al. 2014, Proceedings of the SPIE, 9146, 91461Q CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montargès, M., Norris, R., Chiavassa, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 614, A12 Google Scholar
Norris, R. P., Baron, F. R., Monnier, J. D., et al. 2021,ApJ, 919, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohnaka, K., Weigelt, G., & Hofmann, K.-H. 2019, ApJ, 883, 89 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paladini, C., Baron, F., Jorissen, A., et al. 2018, Nature, 553, 310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roettenbacher, R. M., Monnier, J. D., Korhonen, H., et al. 2016, Nature, 533, 217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roettenbacher, R. M., Monnier, J. D., Korhonen, H., et al. 2017, ApJ, 849, 120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarzschild, M. 1975, ApJ, 195, 137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. W., Dhillon, V. S., & Haniff, C. A. 1997, MNRAS, 291, 819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woitke, P. 2006, A&A, 460, L9.Google Scholar