Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-2pp2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-01T01:25:17.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ages, metallicities and structure of stellar clusters in the Magellanic Bridge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2025

Raphael A. P. Oliveira*
Affiliation:
Universidade de São Paulo, IAG, Rua do Matão 1226, São Paulo 05508-090, Brazil
Francisco F. S. Maia
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Av. Athos da Silveira, 149, Rio de Janeiro 21941-909, Brazil
Beatriz Barbuy
Affiliation:
Universidade de São Paulo, IAG, Rua do Matão 1226, São Paulo 05508-090, Brazil
Bruno Dias
Affiliation:
Instituto de Alta Investigación, Sede Esmeralda, Universidad de Tarapacá, Av. Luis Emilio Recabarren 2477, Iquique, Chile

Abstract

The formation of the Magellanic Bridge during an encounter between the Magellanic Clouds ∼ 200 Myr ago would be imprinted in the chemical evolution and kinematics of its stellar population, with sites of active star formation. Since it contains hundreds of stellar clusters and associations, we combined deep photometry from VISCACHA and SMASH surveys to explore this topic, by deriving structural parameters, age, metallicity, distance and mass for 33 Bridge clusters with robust statistical tools. We identified a group of 13 clusters probably stripped from the Small Magellanic Cloud (0.5 − 4.7 Gyr, [Fe/H] < −0.6 dex) and another 15 probably formed in-situ (< 200 Myr, [Fe/H] ∼ −0.4 dex). Two metallicity dips were detected in the age-metallicity relation, coeval to the Stream and Bridge formation epochs. Cluster masses range from 500 to ∼ 104 M, and a new estimate of 3 − 5 × 105 M is obtained for the Bridge stellar mass.

Information

Type
Poster Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Besla, G., Kallivayalil, N., Hernquist, L., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 2109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bica, E., Westera, P., Kerber, L. O., et al. 2020, AJ, 159, 82 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bressan, A., Marigo, P., Girardi, L., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Y., Olsen, K., Besla, G., et al. 2022, ApJ, 927, 153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz, J. & Bekki, K. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., et al. 2013, PASP, 125, 306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. 2007, ApJ, 658, 345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindman, J. V., Kerr, F. J. & McGee, R. X. 1963, AuJPh, 16, 570 Google Scholar
King, I. 1962, AJ, 67, 471 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maia, F. F. S., Corradi, W. J. B. & Santos, J. F. C. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 1875 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maia, F. F. S., Piatti, A. E., Santos, J. F. C. 2014, MNRAS, 437, 2005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maia, F. F. S., Dias, B., Santos, J. F. C., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 5702 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nidever, D. L., Olsen, K., Walker, A. R., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, R. A. P., Maia, F. F. S., Barbuy, B., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:2306.05503 Google Scholar
Santos, J. F. C., Maia, F. F. S., Dias, B., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowron, D. M., Jacyszyn, A. M., Udalski, A., et al. 2014, ApJ, 795, 108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, S. O., Kerber, L. O., Barbuy, B., et al. 2020, ApJ, 890, 38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsujimoto, T. & Bekki, K. 2009, ApJ, 700, 69 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zivick, P., Kallivayalil, N., van der Marel, R. P., et al. 2018, ApJ, 864, 55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar