Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T02:13:32.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exit times for elliptic diffusions and BMO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

R. Bañuelos  and
B. Øksendal
R. Bañuelos
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics 253-37, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91125
B. Øksendal
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In 1948 P. Lévy formulated the following theorem: If U is an open subset of the complex plane and f:U → ℂ is a nonconstant analytic function, then f maps a 2-dimensional Brownian motion Bt (up to the exit time from U) into a time changed 2-dimensional Brownian motion. A rigorous proof of this result first appeared in McKean [22]. This theorem has been used by many authors to solve problems about analytic functions by reducing them to problems about Brownian motion where the arguments are often more transparent. The survey paper [8] is a good reference for some of these applications. Lévy's theorem has been generalized, first by Bernard, Campbell, and Davie [5], and subsequently by Csink and Øksendal [7]. In Section 1 of this note we use these generalizations of Lévy's theorem to extend some results about BMO functions in the unit disc to harmonic morphisms in ℝn to holomorphic functions in ℂn and to analytic functions on Riemann surfaces. In Section 2, we characterize the domains in ℝn which have the property that the expected exit time of elliptic diffusions is uniformly bounded as a function of the starting point. This extends a result of Hayman and Pommerenke [15], and Stegenga [24] about BMO domains in the complex plane.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , June 1987 , pp. 273 - 287
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 1987

References

REFERENCES

1.Sizenman, M. and Simon, B., Brownian motion and a Harnack inequality for Schrödinger operators. Comm, Pure and Appl. Math. 35 (1982), 209–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Alexander, H., Taylor, B. A. and Ullman, J. L., Areas of projections of analytic sets, Invent. Math. 16 (1972), 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Aronson, D. G., Bounds for the fundamental solution of a parabolic equation, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73 (1967), 890–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Axler, S. and Shapiro, J., Putnam's theorem, Alexander's spectral area estimates, and VMO, Math. Ann., to appear.Google Scholar
5.Bernard, A., Campbell, E. A. and Davie, A. M., Brownian motion and generalized analytic and inner functions, Ann. Inst. Fourier 29 (1979), 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Blumenthal, R. M. and Getoor, R. K., Markov Processes and Potential Theory (Academic Press, 1968).Google Scholar
7.Csink, L. and Øksendal, B., Stochastic harmonic morphisms: Functions mapping the paths of one diffusion into the paths of another, Ann. Inst. Fourier 32 (1983), 219–240.Google Scholar
8.Davis, B., Brownian motion and analytic functions, Ann. Probab. 7 (1979), 913–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Debiard, A. and Gaveau, B., Frontière de Silov de domaines faiblement pseudoconvexes de ℂn, Bull. Sci. Math. 100 (1976), 17–31.Google Scholar
10.Durrett, R., Brownian Motion and Martingales in Analysis (Wadsworth, 1984).Google Scholar
11.Fuglede, B., Harmonic morphisms between Riemannian manifolds, Ann. Inst. Fourier 28 (1978), 107–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Fukushima, M, Dirichlet Forms and Markov Process (North-Holland/Kodansha, 1980).Google Scholar
13.Garnett, J., Bounded Analytic Functions (Academic Press, 1980). 14.Google Scholar
14Hansen, L. J., The Hardy class of a function with slowly-growing area, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 45 (1974), 409–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Hayman, W. K. and Pommerenke, Ch., On analytic functions of bounded mean oscillation, Bull. London Math. Soc. 10 (1978), 219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Ikeda, N. and Watanabe, S., Stochastic Differential Equations and Diffusion Process (North-Holland/Kodansha, 1981).Google Scholar
17.Kakutani, S., TWO dimensional Brownian motion and the type problem of Riemann surfaces, Proc. Japan Acad. 21 (1945), 138–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Krantz, S., Holomorphic functions of bounded mean oscillation and mapping properties of the Szego projection, Duke Math. J. 49 (1980), 743–761.Google Scholar
19.Kobayashi, S., Range sets and BMO norms of analytic functions, Canad. J. Math. 36 (1984), 747–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Littman, W., Stampacchia, G. and Weinberger, H. F., Regular points for elliptic equations with discontinuous coefficients, Ann. Scuola. Norm. Sup. Pisa. CP. Sci. 17 (1963), 43–76.Google Scholar
21.Løw, E., Inner functions and boundary values in H∞(Ω) and A(Ω) in smoothly bounded pseudoconvex domains, Math. Z. 185 (1984), 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Mckean, H. P., Stochastic Integrals (Academic Press, 1969).Google Scholar
23.Øksendal, B., When is a stochastic integral a time change of a diffusion? to appear.Google Scholar
24.Stegenga, D. A., A geometric condition which implies BMOA, Michigan Math. J. 29 (1980), 247–252.Google Scholar
25.Stein, E. M., Boundary Behaviour of Holomorphic Functions of Several Complex Variables (Princeton Univ. Press, 1972)Google Scholar