Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-nr592 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-30T06:00:16.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remanufacturing as a circular design strategy in healthcare: integrating socio-technical and environmental-economic assessments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Amanda Worsøe Andersen ,
Siri Fritze Jørgensen ,
Wendy Gunn  and
Monia Niero
Amanda Worsøe Andersen
Affiliation:
Viegand Maagøe A/S, Denmark
Siri Fritze Jørgensen
Affiliation:
Public Procurement, Region Hovedstaden, The Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark
Wendy Gunn*
Affiliation:
Aalborg University, Denmark
Monia Niero
Affiliation:
Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Italy
*
wendyg@plan.aau.dk

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper examines the role of remanufacturing in healthcare as a key circular design strategy, particularly for medical devices, assessing its socio-technical, environmental, and economic dimensions of sustainability. Through a detailed case of ultrasound catheters, it demonstrates how remanufacturing can lead to resource conservation, cost savings, and enhanced product lifecycles in health care without compromising quality and patient safety. The study argues for systemic changes in healthcare practices to fully integrate remanufacturing, underscoring its role beyond a technical solution.

Keywords

sustainability assessmentremanufacturingmedical devicedesign strategycircular economy

Information

Type
Design for Sustainability
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 1179 - 1188
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

AMDR (2021), Reprocessing by the numbers. [online] AMDR | Association of Medical Device Reprocessors. Available at: http://amdr.org/reprocessing-by-the-numbers/ (accessed 13.11.2023).Google Scholar
Andersen, A. W. and Sørensen, S. F. (2022), A case study of the environmental and economic sustainability of using remanufactured ultrasound catheters, [Master Thesis], Aalborg University. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.20587.82725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antoniadou, M., Varzakas, T. and Tzoutzas, I. (2021), “Circular economy in conjunction with treatment methodologies in the biomedical and dental waste sectors”, Circular Economy and Sustainability, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 563–592., https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-020-00001-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callon, M. (2001), “Actor Network Theory”, In: Smelser, N. J., Baltes, P. B., International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioural Sciences, Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp. 62-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/03168-5.Google Scholar
Farazee, M.A., Asif, Roci, M., Lieder, M., Rashid, A., Mihelič, A. and Kotnik, S. (2021), “A methodological approach to design products for multiple lifecycles in the context of circular manufacturing systems”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 296, No. 126534, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126534Google Scholar
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2013), Towards the circular economy, Vol. 2. In Opportunities for the consumer goods sector. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Available at: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/TCE_Report-2013.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ellram, L. M. (1995), “Total cost of ownership: An analysis approach for purchasing”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol 25, No 8, pp. 4–23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09600039510099928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Council (2017) Regulation 2017/745. On medical devices. European Parliament and Council. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/745/ojGoogle Scholar
Eze, S., Ijomah, W. and Wong, T. C. (2020), “Remanufacturing: a potential sustainable solution for increasing medical equipment availability”, Journal of Remanufacturing, Vol, 10, No. 2, pp. 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13243-020-00080-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HCWH (2014), Global Road map for health care decarbonization. [online] Healthcareclimateaction.org. Available at: https://healthcareclimateaction.org/fact-sheets/en/English%20-%20Denmark (accessed 12.11.2023).Google Scholar
Ferrin, B. G. and Plank, R. E. (2002), “Total Cost of Ownership Models: An Exploratory Study”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2002.tb00132.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fofou, R. F., Jiang, Z. and Wang, Y. (2021), “A review on the lifecycle strategies enhancing remanufacturing”, Applied Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 13, 5937, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11135937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISO (2008) Miljøledelse - Livscyklusvurdering - Principper og struktur (DS/EN ISO 14040).Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2021. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S.L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M.I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J.B.R., Maycock, T.K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R. and Zhou, B. (eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896Google Scholar
National Health Service (2022), Device remanufacture ´How to Guide´ Medical devices. [online] NHS. Available at: https://www.lpp.nhs.uk/media/477394/Device-Remanufacturing-How-to-Guide-ppt.pdf (accessed 13.11.2023)Google Scholar
Oturu, K., Ijomah, W.L., Broeksmit, A., Hernandez Reig, D., Millar, M., Peacock, C. and Rodger, J. (2021), “Investigation of remanufacturing technologies for medical equipment in the UK and context in which technology can be exported in the developing world”, Journal of Remanufacturing, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 227-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13243-021-00102-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulte, A., Maga, D. and Thonemann, N. (2021), “Combining Life Cycle Assessment and Circularity Assessment to Analyze Environmental Impacts of the Medical Remanufacturing of Electrophysiology Catheters”, Sustainability, Vol. 13, No. 2, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statens Serums Institute. (2019), Genbehandling af steriliserbart medicinsk udstyr Ssi.dk. Available at: https://hygiejne.ssi.dk/NIRGenbehandling (accessed: 12.11.2023).Google Scholar
Paterson, D. A. P., Ijomah, W. L., & Windmill, J. F. C. (2017), “End-of-life decision tool with emphasis on remanufacturing”. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 148, pp. 653–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeda, A. (2021), The reprocessing solution: Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and lowering healthcare costs, [online] Amdr.org. Available at: https://amdr.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Reducing-Greenhouse-Gas-Emissions.pdf (accessed 12.11.2023).Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Zhang, M., Zhang, H., Jiang, Z., Liu, C. and Cai, W. (2020), “A review on energy, environment and economic assessment in remanufacturing based on life cycle assessment method”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 255. No. 120160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar