Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T22:46:18.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prototyping through the Lens of Network Analysis and Visualisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

L. Kent ,
J. Gopsill ,
L. Giunta ,
M. Goudswaard ,
C. Snider  and
B. Hicks
L. Kent*
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, United Kingdom
J. Gopsill
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, United Kingdom
L. Giunta
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, United Kingdom
M. Goudswaard
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, United Kingdom
C. Snider
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, United Kingdom
B. Hicks
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, United Kingdom
*
lee.kent@bristol.ac.uk

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Prototyping is a well-established and valued design process activity. However, capturing prototypes and the tacit knowledge that led to and was gained from their creation is a challenge. Beyond that, questions remain on how best to utilise that captured data. This paper looks at how one can exploit and generate insights from data that has been captured, specifically looking at graph databases, the network analysis techniques they permit and the differing fidelities of visualisation and interactivity that they enable.

Keywords

design processnetwork approachesprototyping
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 743 - 752
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Anderson, B. J. H., David, A. T. & Weber, G., 2019. Immersion or Diversion: Does Virtual Reality Make Data Visualisation More Effective?. International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication (ICEIC), pp. 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracewell, R., Wallace, K., Moss, M. & Knott, D., 2008. Capturing design rationale. Computer-Aided Design, 41(3), pp. 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braha, D. & Bar-Yam, Y., 2007. The statistical mechanics of complex product development: Empirical and analytical results.. Management Science, 53(7), pp. 1127–1145.Google Scholar
Bresciani, S., 2019. Visual design thinking: a collaborative dimensions framework to profile visualisations. Design Studies, Volume 63, pp. 92–124.Google Scholar
Camburn, B. et al. ., 2015. A Systematic Method for Design Prototyping. Journal of Mechanical Design, 137(8), p. 081102.Google Scholar
Cash, P., Tino, S. & Mario, Š., 2013. An Analysis of Engineers Information Seeking Activity. s.l., IDETC/CIE.Google Scholar
Chandrasegaran, S. K. et al. ., 2013. The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems. Computer-Aided Design, 45(2), pp. 204–228.Google Scholar
Clarkson, J., Simons, C. & Eckert, C., 2004. Predicting change propagation in complex design. Mechanical Design, 126(5), pp. 788–797.Google Scholar
Design Council, 2022. What is the framework for innovation? Design Council's evolved Double Diamond. [Online] [Accessed 14 02 2022].Google Scholar
Erichsen, J., Sjöman, H., Steinert, M. & Welo, T., 2021. Protobooth: gathering and analyzing data on prototyping in early-stage engineering design projects by digitally capturing physical prototypes. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 35(1), pp. 65–80.Google Scholar
Fonnet, A. & Prie, Y., 2021. Survey of Immersive Analytics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.Google Scholar
Giunta, L. et al. ., 2022. Pro2Booth: Towards an Improved Tool For Capturing Prototypes and the Prototyping Process. International Design Conference.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, G., 2016. Linkographic Evidence for Concurrent Divergent and Convergent Thinking in Creative Design. Creativity Research Journal.Google Scholar
Gopsill, J., Humphrey, M., Thompson, D. & Garcia, E., 2020. Co-word graphs for design and manufacture knowledge mapping. Cavtat, Design Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopsill, J., McAlpine, H. & Hicks, B., 2013. A social media framework to support engineering design communication. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 27(4), pp. 580–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopsill, J., McAlpine, H. & Hicks, B., 2015. Supporting engineering design communication using a custom-built social media tool - PartBook. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 29(3), pp. 535–548.Google Scholar
Gopsill, J., Snider, C. & Hicks, B., 2019. The emergent structures in digital engineering work: what can we learn from dynamic DSMs of near-identical systems design projects?. Design Science, Volume 9.Google Scholar
Goudswaard, M. et al., 2022. Pro2Booth. Cavtat, s.n., p. [In Review].Google Scholar
Idrissov, A., Škec, S. & & Maier, A., 2020. Visualising Systems: Mapping System Features and Interactive Information Visualisations in Design. International Design Conference, pp. 2295–2304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, L., Özkil, A. & Mortensen, N., 2016. Prototypes in Engineering Design: Definitions and Strategies. Cavtat, Proceedings of the DESIGN 2016 14th International Design Conference.Google Scholar
Jensen, M., Elverum, C. & S, M., 2017. Eliciting unknown unknowns with prototypes: Introducing prototrials and prototrial-driven cultures. Design Studies.Google Scholar
Kent, L., 2021. Mixed reality in design prototyping: A systematic review. Design Studies.Google Scholar
Lauff, C., Kotys-Schwartz, D. & Rentschler, M., 2018. What is a Prototype? What are the Roles of Prototypes in Companies? . Journal of Mechanical Design, 140(6), p. 061102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liker, J. & Pereira, R., 2018. Virtual and physical prototyping practices: finding the right fidelity starts with understanding the product. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 46(4), pp. 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAlpine, H., Cash, P. & Hicks, B., 2017. The role of logbooks as mediators of engineering design work. Design Studies, Volume 48, pp. 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millais, P., Jones, S. & Kelly, R., 2018. Exploring Data in Virtual Reality: Comparisons with 2D Data Visualizations. CHI '18: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Google Scholar
Nelson, J., Berlin, A. & Menold, J., 2019. ARCHIE: An Automated Data Collection Method for Physical Prototyping Efforts in Authentic Design Situations. ASME 2019 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference.Google Scholar
Network, X, 2022. Girvan-Newman algorithm. [Online] Available at: https://networkx.guide/algorithms/community-detection/girvan-newman/[Accessed 17 02 2022].Google Scholar
Newman, M. E. J., 2004. Analysis of weighted networks. Physical Review E.Google Scholar
Parraguez Ruiz, P. & Maier, A., 2016. Using Network Science to Support Design Research: From Counting to Connecting. Experimental Design Research, pp. 153–175.Google Scholar
Piccolo, S., Lehmann, S. & Maier, A., 2017. Using data- and network science to reveal iterations and phase-transitions in the design process. Vancouver, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17).Google Scholar
Radkowski, R., Herrema, J. & J, O., 2015. Augmented Reality-Based Manual Assembly Support With Visual Features for Different Degrees of Difficulty. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction.Google Scholar
Real, R., Snider, C., Goudswaard, M. & H, B., 2021. Dimensions of Knowledge in Prototyping: A Review and Characterisation of Prototyping Methods. Proceedings of the Design Society, Volume 1, pp. 1303–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skec, S., Štorga, M., Ribarić, Z. & Marjanovic, D., 2015. Work sampling approach for measuring intellectual capital elements in product development context. Milan, Design Society.Google Scholar
Štorga, M., Andreasen, M. & Marjanović, D., 2010. The design ontology: foundation for the design knolwedge exchange and management. Journal for Engineering Design, 21(4), pp. 427–454.Google Scholar
Štorga, M., Mostashari, A. & Stanković, a. T., 2013. Visualisation of the organisation knowledge structure evolution.. Journal of Knowledge Management.Google Scholar
Wang, G., 2002. Definition and Review of Virtual Prototyping. s.l., Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynn, D. & Clarkson, P., 2018. Process models in design and development. Research in Engineering Design, Volume 29, p. 161–202.Google Scholar