Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T00:58:54.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FROM THE DEFINITION OF USER EXPERIENCE TO A FRAMEWORK TO CLASSIFY ITS APPLICATIONS IN DESIGN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Aurora Berni  and
Yuri Borgianni
Aurora Berni*
Affiliation:
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Yuri Borgianni
Affiliation:
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
*
Berni, Aurora, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Science and Technology, Italy, aurora.berni@natec.unibz.it

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The concept of User Experience (UX) dates back to the 1990s, but a shared definition of UX is not available. As design integrates UX, different interpretations thereof can complicate the possibility to build upon previous literature and develop the field autonomously. Indeed, by analysing the literature, UX emerges as a cauldron of related and closely linked concepts. However, it is possible to find recurring attributes that emerge from those definitions, which are ascribable to two foci: the fundamental elements of the interaction (user, system, context) and typologies of experience (ergonomic, cognitive, and emotional). Those are used to build a framework. We have preliminarily investigated how UX is dealt with in design by mapping a sample of UX-related experimental articles published in design journals. We classified UX case studies based on the framework to individuate the UXs that emerge most frequently and the most studied ones in the design field. The two-focus framework allows the mapping of experiments involving UX in design, without highlighting specific favorable combinations. However, comprehensive studies dealing with all elements and UX typologies have not been found.

Keywords

Experience designUser centred designEmotional designUser experienceFramework
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 1: ICED21 , August 2021 , pp. 1627 - 1636
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Alben, L. (1996), “Quality of experience: defining the criteria for effective interaction design”, Interactions, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 11–15.10.1145/235008.235010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagnasacco, M. (2011), “Sustainable Process in Design Thinking: Beyond Aesthetics and the Ordinary.”, Design Principles & Practice: An International Journal, Vol. 5 No. 6, pp. 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battarbee, K. and Koskinen, I. (2005), “Co-experience: user experience as interaction”, CoDesign, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belk, R.W. (1988), “Possessions and the Extended Self”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belz, S.M. (2006), “Development of a New Photographic Experience”, Ergonomics in Design, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 19–24.10.1177/106480460601400406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berni, A., Maccioni, L. and Borgianni, Y. (2020), “Observing Pictures and Videos of Creative Products: An Eye Tracking Study”, Applied Sciences, Vol. 10 No. 4, p. 1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Bijl-Brouwer, M. and van der Voort, M. (2014), “Understanding design for dynamic and Diverse Use Situations”, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 29–42.Google Scholar
Bongard-Blanchy, K., Bouchard, C., Bonnardel, N., Lockner, D. and Aoussat, A. (2015), “User experience dimensions in product design: a consolidation of what academic researchers know and what design practitioners do”, Journal of Design Research, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 107–124.10.1504/JDR.2015.069754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buskermolen, D., Terken, J.M.B. and Eggen, J.H. (2015), “The co-constructing stories method: feedback of designers on use of the method in real design cases”, The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 17–28.Google Scholar
Chamorro-Koc, M., Popovic, V. and Emmison, M. (2008), “Using visual representation of concepts to explore users and designers’ concepts of everyday products”, Design Studies, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 142–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colbert, M. (2005), “User experience of communication before and during rendezvous: interim results”, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 134–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cor, E. and Zwolinski, P. (2015), “A Protocol to Address User Behavior in the Eco-Design of Consumer Products”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 137 No. 7, available at:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Córdoba-Cely, C. and Alatriste-Martínez, Y. (2013), “Visualization of Knowledge Domains in the User Experience”, The International Journal of Visual Design, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 15–26.10.18848/2325-1581/CGP/v06i01/38738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crilly, N. (2011), “Do Users Know What Designers Are Up To? Product Experience and the Inference of Persuasive Intentions”, International Journal of Dsign, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Cruz Mendoza, R., Bianchi-Berthouze, N., Romero, P. and Lavín, G.C. (2015), “A classification of user experience frameworks for movement-based interaction design”, The Design Journal, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 393–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmet, P. and Hekkert, P. (2007), “Framework of Product Experience”, International Journal of Design, Vol. 1, pp. 57–66.Google Scholar
DIS, I. (2010), “9241-210: 2010. Ergonomics of human system interaction-Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (formerly known as 13407)”, International Standardization Organization (ISO). Switzerland.Google Scholar
Ferrise, F., Bordegoni, M. and Graziosi, S. (2013), “A Method for Designing Users’ Experience with Industrial Products based on a Multimodal Environment and Mixed Prototypes”, Computer-Aided Design and Applications, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 461–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrise, F., Graziosi, S., Furtado, G.P., Bordegoni, M. and Bongini, D. (2013), “Re-engineering of the Haptic Feedback of a Dishwasher Door”, Computer-Aided Design and Applications, Vol. 10 No. 6, pp. 995–1006.10.3722/cadaps.2013.995-1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fokkinga, S.F. and Desmet, P.M.A. (2013), “Ten Ways to Design for Disgust, Sadness, and Other Enjoyments: A Design Approach to Enrich Product Experiences with Negative Emotions”, International Journal of Design, Vol. 7 No. 1, available at: http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/1180 (accessed 11 November 2020).Google Scholar
Ghajargar, M., Longo, L., Gargiulo, E. and Giannantonio, R. (2017), “Empathy Workshop: When Project team and Pilot Users Exchange Experiences”, The Design Journal, Vol. 20 No. sup1, pp. S3837–S3848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gkouskos, D., Normark, C.J. and Lundgren, S. (2014), “What drivers really want: Investigating dimensions in automobile user needs”, International Journal of Design, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 59–71.Google Scholar
Goto, K. (2004), “Brand Value and the User Experience”, Digital Web, 14 July, available at: http://www.digital-web.com/articles/brand_value_and_the_user_experience/ (accessed 14 October 2020).Google Scholar
Hassenzahl, M. (2004), “The Interplay of Beauty, Goodness, and Usability in Interactive Products”, Human–Computer Interaction, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 319–349.10.1207/s15327051hci1904_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassenzahl, M. (2010), “Experience Design: Technology for All the Right Reasons”, Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 1–95.10.2200/S00261ED1V01Y201003HCI008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassenzahl, M. and Tractinsky, N. (2006), “User experience - a research agenda”, Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hekkert, P. (2006), “Design aesthetics: principles of pleasure in design”, Psychology Science, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 157–172.Google Scholar
Hoyos-Ruiz, J., Martínez-Cadavid, J.F., Osorio-Gómez, G. and Mejía-Gutiérrez, R. (2017), “Implementation of ergonomic aspects throughout the engineering design process: Human-Artefact-Context analysis”, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 263–277.10.1007/s12008-015-0282-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, J. (1984), “Designing the spatial experience”, Design Studies, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jallouli, J. and Moreau, G. (2009), “Virtual reality as a landscape decision-making tool: The wind turbines’ case”, Int. J. Distrib. Syst. Technol, Vol. 16, pp. 73–88.Google Scholar
Johnston, A., Candy, L. and Edmonds, E. (2008), “Designing and evaluating virtual musical instruments: facilitating conversational user interaction”, Design Studies, Vol. 29 No. 6, pp. 556–571.10.1016/j.destud.2008.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karana, E., Rognoli, V. and Zeeuw Van Der Laan, A. (2015), “Material driven design (MDD): A method to design for material experiences”, International Journal of Dsign, available at: http://index.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/1965 (accessed 10 November 2020).Google Scholar
Karapanos, E., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J. and Martens, J.-B. (2009), “User experience over time: an initial framework”, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 729–738.10.1145/1518701.1518814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karvonen, K. (2000), “The beauty of simplicity”, Proceedings on the 2000 Conference on Universal Usability, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keinonen, T. (2010), “Protect and appreciate – Notes on the Justification of User-Centered Design”, p. 11.Google Scholar
Kim, C. and Christiaans, H. (2012), “‘Soft’ usability problems with consumer electronics: the interaction between user characteristics and usability”, Journal of Design Research, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, E., Chung, J., Beckman, S. and Agogino, A.M. (2016), “Design Roadmapping: A Framework and Case Study on Planning Development of High-Tech Products in Silicon Valley”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 138 No. 101106, available at:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuniavsky, M. (2010), Smart Things: Ubiquitous Computing User Experience Design, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Law, E., Roto, V., Vermeeren, A.P.O.S., Kort, J. and Hassenzahl, M. (2008), “Towards a shared definition of user experience”, CHI ’08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 2395–2398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, E.L.-C., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A.P.O.S. and Kort, J. (2009), “Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach”, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 719–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, E.L.-C. and van Schaik, P. (2010), “Modelling user experience – An agenda for research and practice”, Interacting with Computers, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockton, D., Harrison, D. and Stanton, N.A. (2012), “Models of the user: designers’ perspectives on influencing sustainable behaviour”, Journal of Design Research, Vol. 10 No. 1–2, pp. 7–27.10.1504/JDR.2012.046137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludden, G.D.S. and Rompay, T.J.L. van. (2015), “How does it feel? Exploring touch on different levels of product experience”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 26 No. 4–6, pp. 157–168.10.1080/09544828.2015.1036011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mäkelä, A. and Fulton Suri, J. (2001), “Supporting users’ creativity: Design to induce pleasurable experiences”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Affective Human Factors Design, pp. 387–394.Google Scholar
Markussen, T. (2009), “How Emotional Structures May Change Expectations of Technology Use in Hospitals”, p. 13.Google Scholar
Markussen, T. and Krogh, P.G. (2008), “Mapping Cultural Frame Shifting in Interaction Design with Blending Theory”, International Journal of Design, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 5–17.Google Scholar
McCarthy, G.M., Ramírez, E.R.R. and Robinson, B.J. (2017), “Design Experiments. Identifying areas for intervention and designing medical technology for adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes”, The Design Journal, Vol. 20 No. sup1, pp. S2044–S2056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. and Wright, P. (2004), Technology as Experience, Vol. 11, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States.Google Scholar
McNamara, N. and Kirakowski, J. (2006), “Functionality, usability, and user experience: three areas of concern”, Interactions, Vol. 13 No. 6, pp. 26–28.10.1145/1167948.1167972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merholz, P. (2007), “Peter in Conversation with Don Norman About UX & Innovation | Adaptive Path”, available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20131207190602/http://www.adaptivepath.com/ideas/e000862/ (accessed 13 October 2020).Google Scholar
Merter, S. (2017), “Synesthetic Approach in the Design Process for Enhanced Creativity and Multisensory Experiences”, The Design Journal, Vol. 20 No. sup1, pp. S4519–S4528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nam, T.-J., Park, S. and Verlinden, J. (2009), “A model to conceptualize interactivity”, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, D., Miller, J. and Henderson, A. (1995), “What You See, Some of What's in the Future, And How We Go About Doing It: HI at Apple Computer”, presented at the CHI ’95 MOSAIC OF CREATIVITY, p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, D. and Nielsen, J. (2017), “The Definition of User Experience (UX)”, Nielsen Norman Group, available at: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/definition-user-experience/ (accessed 14 October 2020).Google Scholar
Normark, C.J. and Gustafsson, A. (2014), “Design and evaluation of a personalisable user interface in a vehicle context”, Journal of Design Research, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 308–329.10.1504/JDR.2014.065845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nurkka, P., Kujala, S. and Kemppainen, K. (2009), “Capturing users’ perceptions of valuable experience and meaning”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 449–465.10.1080/09544820903158835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyber, P. and Kempic, J. (2006), “Transforming the Laundry Process”, Ergonomics in Design, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oygür, I. (2017), “User, Research, and Practice. Learning from Design Consultancies”, The Design Journal, Vol. 20 No. sup1, pp. S4621–S4631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettersson, I. (2017), “Travelling from Fascination to New Meanings”:, Vol. 11 No. 2, p. 11.Google Scholar
Postma, C., Zwartkruis-Pelgrim, E., Daemen, E. and Du, J. (2012), “Challenges of Doing Empathic Design: Experiences from Industry”, International Journal of Dsign, available at: http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/1008 (accessed 10 November 2020).Google Scholar
Pucillo, F. and Cascini, G. (2014), “A framework for user experience, needs and affordances”, Design Studies, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 160–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebelo, F., Noriega, P., Duarte, E. and Soares, M. (2012), “Using Virtual Reality to Assess User Experience”, Human Factors, Vol. 54, pp. 964–982.10.1177/0018720812465006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roto, V., Law, E., Vermeeren, A.P.O.S. and Hoonhout, J. (2010), USER EXPERIENCE WHITE PAPER Bringing Clarity to the Concept of User Experience, Hoonhout and Research - Delft University of Technology, Dagstuhl, p. 12.Google Scholar
Sansoni, S., Wodehouse, A., McFadyen, A. and Buis, A. (2016), “Utilising the Repertory Grid Technique in Visual Prosthetic Design: Promoting a User-Centred Approach”, Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 31–46.10.3233/jid-2016-0015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
da Silva, O., Crilly, N. and Hekkert, P. (2015), “How people's appreciation of products is affected by their knowledge of the designers’ intentions”, International Journal of Design, Vol. 9, pp. 21–33.Google Scholar
Siu, K.W.M., Ng, A.W.Y. and Chan, C.C.H. (2011), “The Imagery Vividness and Preferences of Older People: Implications for Visualization in Concept Design”, The Design Journal, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 413–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, S. and Teng, L. (2017), “Establishing China's First UX Master Program Based on Applied Psychology Perspective”, in Marcus, A. and Wang, W. (Eds.), Design, User Experience, and Usability: Theory, Methodology, and Management, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 767–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutcliffe, A. (2009), Designing for User Engagement: Aesthetic and Attractive User Interfaces, Morgan & Claypool Publishers.Google Scholar
Sward, D. and Macarthur, G. (2007), “Making user experience a business strategy”, Law, E. et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Towards a UX Manifesto, Vol. 3, pp. 35–40.Google Scholar
Torres, R.J. (Bob), Heck, M.P., Rudd, J.R. and Kelley, J.F. (Jeff). (2009), “Usability Engineering: ‘Best of the Best’ Best Practices”, Ergonomics in Design, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, C.R. and De Angeli, A. (2014), “Applying user centred and participatory design approaches to commercial product development”, Design Studies, Vol. 35 No. 6, pp. 614–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M.A., Attridge, A. and Pitts, M. (2011), “User-centred design and evaluation of automotive seat adjustment controls”, International Journal of Vehicle Design, Vol. 55 No. 2-4, pp. 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, C.-M. and Smith, S. (2015), “A haptic keypad design with a novel interactive haptic feedback method”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 26 No. 4–6, pp. 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Y. and Pillan, M. (2017), “From respect to change user behaviour. Research on how to design a next generation of smart home objects from User Experience and Interaction Design”, The Design Journal, Vol. 20 No. sup1, pp. S3884–S3898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, K.-C. (Martin), Gregory, J.P. and Ritter, F.E. (2010), “One Laptop per Child: Polishing Up the Xo Laptop User Experience”, Ergonomics in Design, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, J., Pohlmeyer, A.E. and Desmet, P.M.A. (2017), “EmotionPrism: a design tool that communicates 25 pleasurable human-product interactions”, Journal of Design Research, Vol. 15 No. 3–4, pp. 174–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, N. and Kong, J. (2016), “User experience with web browsing on small screens: Experimental investigations of mobile-page interface design and homepage design for news websites”, Information Sciences, Vol. 330, pp. 427–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, F., Xu, Q. and Jiao, R.J. (2011), “Fundamentals of product ecosystem design for user experience”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuo, H., Jones, M., Hope, T. and Jones, R. (2016), “Sensory Perception of Material Texture in Consumer Products”, The Design Journal, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 405–427.10.1080/14606925.2016.1149318CrossRefGoogle Scholar