Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T06:08:57.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Bayesian expert system for additive manufacturing design assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Benedict Alexander Rogers ,
Neill Campbell ,
Mandeep Dhanda ,
Alexander James George Lunt ,
Elise Catherine Pegg  and
Vimal Dhokia
Benedict Alexander Rogers*
Affiliation:
University of Bath, United Kingdom
Neill Campbell
Affiliation:
University of Bath, United Kingdom
Mandeep Dhanda
Affiliation:
University of Bath, United Kingdom
Alexander James George Lunt
Affiliation:
University of Bath, United Kingdom
Elise Catherine Pegg
Affiliation:
University of Bath, United Kingdom
Vimal Dhokia
Affiliation:
University of Bath, United Kingdom
*
bar34@bath.ac.uk

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Tools for analysing additive manufacturability often employ complex models that lack transparency; this impedes user understanding and has detrimental effects on the implementation of results. An expert system tool that transparently learns features for successful printing has been created. The tool uses accessible data from STL models and printer configurations to create explainable parameters and identify risks. Testing has shown good agreement to print behaviour and easy adaptability. The tool reduces the learning curves designers face in understanding design for additive manufacturing.

Keywords

additive manufacturingexpert systemsbayesiandesign for additive manufacturingmachine learning
Type
Design for Additive Manufacturing
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 1809 - 1818
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Amaechi, C.V., Adefuye, E.F., Kgosiemang, I.M., Huang, B. and Amaechi, E.C. (2022), “Scientometric Review for Research Patterns on Additive Manufacturing of Lattice Structures”, Materials, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), Vol. 15 No. 15, https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/MA15155323.Google ScholarPubMed
Andrews, J.L. (2018), “Addressing overfitting and underfitting in Gaussian model-based clustering”, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, North-Holland, Vol. 127, pp. 160–171, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2018.05.015.Google Scholar
Kumar, Bhuvanesh, and Sathiya, M., P. (2021), “Methods and materials for additive manufacturing: A critical review on advancements and challenges”, Thin-Walled Structures, Elsevier, Vol. 159, p. 107228, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.107228.Google Scholar
BrunoPizza. (2021), “Low Poly Samoyed Dog”, Ultimaker, available at: https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4725102.Google Scholar
Carbon-Mangels, M. and Hutter, M.C. (2011), “Selecting Relevant Descriptors for Classification by Bayesian Estimates: A Comparison with Decision Trees and Support Vector Machines Approaches for Disparate Data Sets”, Molecular Informatics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Vol. 30 No. 10, pp. 885–895, https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/MINF.201100069.Google Scholar
S.W., Claudius Ellsel (2021a), “Evaluation of design support tools for additive manufacturing and conceptualisation of an integrated knowledge management framework”, DS 111: Proceedings of the 32nd Symposium Design for X, The Design Society, https://dx.doi.org/10.35199/dfx2021.17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
S.W., Claudius Ellsel (2021b), “Evaluation of design support tools for additive manufacturing and conceptualisation of an integrated knowledge management framework”, DS 111: Proceedings of the 32nd Symposium Design for X, The Design Society, https://dx.doi.org/10.35199/dfx2021.17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haug, A., Wickstrøm, K.A., Stentoft, J. and Philipsen, K. (2023), “Adoption of additive manufacturing: A survey of the role of knowledge networks and maturity in small and medium-sized Danish production firms”, International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, Vol. 255, p. 108714, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108714.Google Scholar
Hemmer, P., Schemmer, M. and Kühl, N. (2021), “Human-AI Complementarity in Hybrid Intelligence Systems: A Structured Literature Review Needmining View project Development of a Point Cloud Labeling Tool to Generate Training Data for 3D Object Detection and 6D Pose Estimation View project”, Twenty-Fifth Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Dubai, UAE, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Jiang, J., Xiong, Y., Zhang, Z. and Rosen, D.W. (2022), “Machine learning integrated design for additive manufacturing”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, Vol. 33 No. 4, pp. 1073–1086, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/S10845-020-01715-6/TABLES/7.Google Scholar
Lluch-Cerezo, J., Benavente, R., Meseguer, M.D. and Gutiérrez, S.C. (2019), “Study of samples geometry to analyze mechanical properties in Fused Deposition Modeling process (FDM)”, Procedia Manufacturing, Elsevier, Vol. 41, pp. 890–897, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.10.012.Google Scholar
Maekawa, T. (1996), “Computation of Shortest Paths on Free-Form Parametric Surfaces”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 118 No. 4, pp. 499–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medellin-Castillo, H.I. and Zaragoza-Siqueiros, J. (2019), “Design and Manufacturing Strategies for Fused Deposition Modelling in Additive Manufacturing: A Review”, Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering (English Edition), Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 1–16, https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/S10033-019-0368-0/FIGURES/8.Google Scholar
Ngaim, Kee Yuan; Khor, I.W. (2019), “Big data and machine learning algorithms for health-care delivery | Elsevier Enhanced Reader”, Digital Oncology 2, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 262–273, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30149-4.Google Scholar
Rogers, B., Valentine, M., Dhokia, V., Pegg, E. and Lunt, A. (2022), “IAM2022-93965”, ASME IAM 2022, ASME, Lisbon, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Schmitt, P., Zorn, S. and Gericke, K. (2021), “Additive Manufacturing Research Landscape: A Literature Review”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 1, pp. 333–344, https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.34.Google Scholar
Sebenius, I., Paananen, T. and Vehtari, A. (2022), “Feature Collapsing for Gaussian Process Variable Ranking”, 25th International Conference on Artifi- Cial Intelligence and Statistics, PMLR, Valencia, pp. 11341–11355.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Liao, Z., Shi, S., Wang, Z. and Poh, H. (2020), “Data-Driven Structural Design Optimization for Petal-Shaped Auxetics Using Isogeometric Analysis topology optimization View project Study on cyclic deformation of auxetic honeycomb lattices: experiment and constitutive modeling View project Data-Driven St”, Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences CMES, Vol. 122 No. 2, pp. 433–458, https://dx.doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2020.08680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., Zhong, R.Y. and Xu, X. (2018), “A decision support system for additive manufacturing process selection using a hybrid multiple criteria decision-making method”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Emerald Group Holdings Ltd., Vol. 24 No. 9, pp. 1544–1553, https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-01-2018-0002/FULL/PDF.Google Scholar
Wiberg, A., Persson, J. and Ölvander, J. (2019a), “Design for additive manufacturing – a review of available design methods and software”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Emerald Group Holdings Ltd., Vol. 25 No. 6, pp. 1080–1094, https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-10-2018-0262/FULL/PDF.Google Scholar
Wiberg, A., Persson, J. and Ölvander, J. (2019b), “Design for additive manufacturing – a review of available design methods and software”, Rapid Prototyping Journal, Emerald Group Holdings Ltd., Vol. 25 No. 6, pp. 1080–1094, https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-10-2018-0262/FULL/PDF.Google Scholar
Wipf, D. and Nagarajan, S. (2007), “A New View of Automatic Relevance Determination”, in Platt, J; Koller, D; Singer, Y; Roweis, S. (Ed.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20, Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
Yang, Q., Steinfeld, A., Rosé, C. and Zimmerman, J. (2020), “Re-examining Whether, Why, and How Human-AI Interaction Is Uniquely Difficult to Design”, Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1–13, https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376301.Google Scholar