Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-p5m67 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-26T19:00:46.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INFLUENCE OF THE PRODUCT CONTEXT OF USE ON A HYBRID SPORT-HEALTH SEMANTICS

Part of: Socio-technical Issues in Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

A. Millet ,
A. Abi Akle  and
J. Legardeur
A. Millet*
Affiliation:
École Supérieure des Technologies Industrielles Avancées, France IMS - Laboratoire de l'Intégration du Matériau au Système, France Sport-Controle, France
A. Abi Akle
Affiliation:
École Supérieure des Technologies Industrielles Avancées, France
J. Legardeur
Affiliation:
École Supérieure des Technologies Industrielles Avancées, France IMS - Laboratoire de l'Intégration du Matériau au Système, France
*
*a.millet@estia.fr

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Products appearances are made of design choices influencing the way products are perceived. Products semantics is a methods used to understand and anticipate this phenomena. Nowadays, consumers consider sport products not only as “sport” but also as “health” products. Designers may then develop them as “sport-health” products. However, perception of “sport-health” products may vary according to the need to fit sport or health context of use. We present in this paper our experimental approach to understand the influence of sport and health contexts on “sport-health” semantics.

Keywords

product designuser-centred designKansei engineering

Information

Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 2059 - 2068
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Ahmed, S., Wallace, K.M. and Blessing, L.T.M. (2003), “Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks”, Research in Engineering Design, Springer Verlag, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, C. and Omhover, J.F. (2016), “Supporting early design through conjoint trends analysis methods and the TRENDS system”, Collaboration in Creative Design: Methods and Tools. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29155-0_4Google Scholar
Chitturi, R. (2009), “Emotions by design: A consumer perspective”, International Journal of Design.Google Scholar
Crilly, N., Maier, A. and Clarkson, P.J. (2008), “Representing artefacts as media: Modelling the relationship between designer intent and consumer experience”, International Journal of Design.Google Scholar
Demirbilek, O. and Sener, B. (2003), “Product design, semantics and emotional response”, Ergonomics. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130310001610874CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Desmet, P. and Hekkert, P. (2007), “Framework of product experience”, International Journal of Design.Google Scholar
Green, A. and Chattaraman, V. (2019), “Creating an affective design typology for basketball shoes using kansei engineering methods”, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 774, Springer Verlag, pp. 355–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Y., Yang, M. and Zhou, M. (2018), “Persuasive semantics of aging health products based on AHP and Kansei engineering”, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol. 585, Springer Verlag, pp. 337–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassenzahl, M. (2010), “Experience Design: Technology for All the Right Reasons”, Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, Morgan & Claypool Publishers LLC, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 1–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, A.F. and Krippendorff, K. (2007), “Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data”, Communication Methods and Measures, Informa UK Limited, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Hippel, E. (2009), “Democratizing Innovation: The Evolving Phenomenon of User Innovation”, International Journal of Innovation Science, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INSEP and Ministère de la ville de la jeunesse et des sports. (2015), “La Pratique Des Activités Physiques et Sportives En France”, edited by Canneva, H.La Pratique Des Activités Physiques et Sportives En France, INSEP-Éditions. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.insep.796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, P.W. (2003), Designing Pleasurable Products : An Introduction to the New Human Factors, Taylor & Francis e-Library.Google Scholar
Khalaj, J. and Pedgley, O. (2014), “Comparison of semantic intent and realization in product design: A study on high-end furniture impressions”, International Journal of Design.Google Scholar
Kongprasert, N. et al. (2008), “How to design and process brand identity through an integrated innovative approach”, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, IEEM 2008. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2008.4737970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krippendorff, K. (2005), “The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design - CRC Press Book”, edited by Press, C., 1st ed. Available at: https://www.crcpress.com/The-Semantic-Turn-A-New-Foundation-for-Design/Krippendorff/p/book/9780415322201 (accessed 26 October 2019).Google Scholar
Krippendorff, K. and Butter, R. (1984), “Product Semantics: Exploring the Symbolic Qualities of Form”, Innovation, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 4–9.Google Scholar
Lallemand, C. and Gronier, G. (2018), “Méthodes de Design UX - C.Lallemand”, G.Gronier - 2ème Édition - Librairie Eyrolles, edited by Eyrolles, 2eme ed., available at: https://www.eyrolles.com/Informatique/Livre/methodes-de-design-ux-9782212673982/ (accessed 24 September 2019).Google Scholar
Lüthje, C. (2004), “Characteristics of innovating users in a consumer goods field: An empirical study of sport-related product consumers”, Technovation, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 24 No. 9, pp. 683–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsac, E., Kim, K.O. and Takatera, M. (2018), “Japanese–French tastes in simulated women's sportswear t-shirts”, International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, Emerald Group Publishing Ltd., Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 641–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masagué, S.G. and Macià, J.L. (2015), “User-Centered Design for Emotion. A Case Study in Wellness Products”, In: Complex Systems Design & Management, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millet, A. et al. (2019), “Definition of a ‘Sport-Health’ Semantic Space”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Cambridge University Press (CUP), Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 3841–3850.Google Scholar
Nagamachi, M. (1989), “Kansei engineering approach to automotive”, Journal of the Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan, Vol. 43, pp. 94–100.Google Scholar
Norman, D.A. (2007), Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things, edited by UK.Google Scholar
Osgood, C.E. (1952), “The nature and measurement of meaning”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 49 No. 3, pp. 197–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petiot, J.F. and Yannou, B. (2004), “Measuring consumer perceptions for a better comprehension, specification and assessment of product semantics”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 33 No. 6, pp. 507–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütte, S. et al. (2008), “Affective meaning: The Kansei Engineering approach”, Product Experience, pp. 477–496.Google Scholar
Shieh, M.D. and Yeh, Y.E. (2015), “A comparative study on perceptual evaluations of sports shoe exterior”, Color Research and Application, John Wiley and Sons Inc, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 178–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefanyshyn, D.J. and Wannop, J.W. (2015), “Biomechanics research and sport equipment development”, Sports Engineering, Springer-Verlag London Ltd, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trujillo, J.L.H., Aviñó, A.M.i. and Millán, C.L. (2017), “User Evaluation of Neonatology Ward Design: An Application of Focus Group and Semantic Differential”, Health Environments Research and Design Journal, SAGE Publications Inc., Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaucher, P. (2017), “Fiabilité d'un test, d'une mesure ou d'une procédure d’évaluation”, Mains Libres, No. June, pp. 49–55.Google Scholar
Wang, W.M. et al. (2018), “Extracting and summarizing affective features and responses from online product descriptions and reviews: A Kansei text mining approach”, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 73, pp. 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, N., Thomson, A. and Riches, P. (2017), “Development and presentation of the first design process model for sports equipment design”, Research in Engineering Design, Springer London, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 495–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar