Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T03:48:34.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DESIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE BEHAVIOR: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF A DATA-DRIVEN APPROACH

Part of: Socio-technical Issues in Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

T. Montecchi  and
N. Becattini
T. Montecchi
Affiliation:
Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Chile
N. Becattini*
Affiliation:
Politecnico di Milano, Italy
*
*niccolo.becattini@polimi.it

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The article stems from the main informative gaps of Design for Sustainable Behaviour and discusses the paramount role of a data-driven approach to inform design. The article stresses how quantitative data can address global sustainability, determine behaviours to modify, measure the impact of new learned sustainable behaviours as well as support the definition of behaviour change strategies, widening the spatial and temporal scales to communities and longitudinal studies and reducing unpredictable biases coming from tacit knowledge externalization and interpretation.

Keywords

sustainable designdata mininghuman behaviouruser-centred design
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 2089 - 2098
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Ackoff, R.L. (1989), “From data to wisdom”, Journal of applied systems analysis, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
Altshuller, G. (1984), Creativity as an exact science, Gordon and Breach.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becattini, N., Cascini, G. and Montagna, F. (2017), “Exploring the Cognitive Dynamics of Product Appreciation”, In: Design Computing and Cognition’16, Springer, Cham, pp. 555–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becattini, N. et al. (2019), “Extracting and Analysing Design Process Data from Log Files of ICT Supported Co-Creative Sessions”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.16Google Scholar
Bhamra, T., Lilley, D. and Tang, T. (2011), “Design for sustainable behaviour: Using products to change consumer behaviour”, The Design Journal, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 427–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boks, C. (2012), “Design for sustainable behaviour research challenges”, In: Design for Innovative Value Towards a Sustainable Society, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 328–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brundtland, G.H. et al. (1987), Our common future, New York.Google Scholar
Brynjarsdottir, H. et al. (2012, May), “Sustainably unpersuaded: how persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability”, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, pp. 947–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coskun, A., Zimmerman, J. and Erbug, C. (2015), “Promoting sustainability through behaviour change: A review”, Design Studies, Vol. 41, pp. 183–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, N. (2008), Engineering Design Methods Strategies for Product Design Fourth edition, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
Daae, J. and Boks, C. (2015a), “Opportunities and challenges for addressing variations in the use phase with LCA and Design for Sustainable Behaviour”, International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 148–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daae, J. and Boks, C. (2015b), “A classification of user research methods for design for sustainable behaviour”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 106, pp. 680–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, E.W.A. (2011), User-efficient design: Reducing the environmental impact of user behaviour through the design of products [Doctoral dissertation, University of Bath].Google Scholar
Fisher, D.H. (2011), “Computing and AI for a Sustainable Future”, IEEE Intelligent Systems, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 14–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gero, J.S. and Kannengiesser, U. (2004), “The situated function–behaviour–structure framework”, Design studies, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giampietro, M. (1994), “Using hierarchy theory to explore the concept of sustainable development”, Futures, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 616–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, B.J. et al. (2002), “A framework for the requirements of capturing, storing and reusing information and knowledge in engineering design”, International journal of information management, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, H., Kwong, C.K. and Yung, K.L. (2017), “Predicting future importance of product features based on online customer reviews”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 139 No. 11, p. 111413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H.H.M. et al. (2017), “Data-Driven Design (D3)”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 139 No. 11, p. 110301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klöckner, C.A., Matthies, E. and Hunecke, M. (2003), “Problems of Operationalizing Habits and Integrating Habits in Normative Decision-Making Models 1”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 396–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilley, D. (2007), Designing for behavioural change: reducing the social impacts of product use through design [Doctoral dissertation, © Debra Lilley].Google Scholar
Lilley, D. (2009), “Design for sustainable behaviour: strategies and perceptions”, Design Studies, Vol. 30 No. 6, pp. 704–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockton, D. et al. (2009, April), “Influencing interaction: development of the design with intent method”, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on persuasive technology, p. 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockton, D., Harrison, D. and Stanton, N.A. (2013), “Exploring design patterns for sustainable behaviour”, The Design Journal, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 431–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montecchi, T., Russo, D. and Liu, Y. (2013), “Searching in Cooperative Patent Classification: Comparison between keyword and concept-based search”, Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nonaka, I. et al. (1994), “Organizational knowledge creation theory: a first comprehensive test”, International Business Review, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parraguez, P. and Maier, A. (2017), “Data-driven engineering design research: opportunities using open data”, DS 87-7 Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol 7: Design Theory and Research Methodology, Vancouver, Canada, 21-25 August 2017, pp. 041–050.Google Scholar
Rowley, J. (2007), “The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy”, Journal of information science, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scurati, G.W. et al. (2019, July), “Multisensory nudging: a design intervention for sustainable hand-washing behaviour in public space”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International.Google Scholar
Smith, E.A. (2001), “The role of tacit and explicit knowledge in the workplace”, Journal of knowledge Management, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 311–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegler, I. (2003), “Technology and knowledge: bridging a “generating” gap”, Information & Management, Vol. 40 No. 6, pp. 533–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tromp, N., Hekkert, P. and Verbeek, P.P. (2011), “Design for socially responsible behaviour: a classification of influence based on intended user experience”, Design issues, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wever, R. et al. (2010), “Influence of packaging design on littering and waste behaviour”, Packaging Technology and Science, Vol. 23 No. 5, pp. 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, M.D. et al. (2016), “The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship”, Scientific data, Vol. 3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, L. et al. (2017), “Identification of performance requirements for design of smartphones based on analysis of the collected operating data”, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 139 No. 11, p. 111418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar