Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T17:04:59.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CONCURRENT CONCEPTUAL DESIGN SEQUENCING FOR MBSE OF COMPLEX SYSTEMS THROUGH DESIGN STRUCTURE MATRICES

Part of: Systems Engineering and Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

S. K. Salas Cordero ,
C. Fortin  and
R. Vingerhoeds
S. K. Salas Cordero*
Affiliation:
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Russia ISAE-SUPAERO, University of Toulouse, France
C. Fortin
Affiliation:
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Russia
R. Vingerhoeds
Affiliation:
ISAE-SUPAERO, University of Toulouse, France
*
*sophia.salas@skolkovotech.ru

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Whilst Concurrent Conceptual Design (CCD) has been performed for many years at facilities such as: the Concurrent Design Facility at ESA and the Project Design Center at JPL-NASA, the sequencing know-how resides in their communities of practice. This paper strives to explain how a sequencing algorithm based on Design Structure Matrices can be used as an instrument to facilitate the interaction between disciplines during CCD studies for Model-Based systems exemplified with two case studies.

Keywords

complex systemsearly design phaseconceptual designconcurrent engineering (CE)design structure matrix (DSM)
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 2375 - 2384
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

“CEDESK”. (n.d.), available at: https://cedesk.github.io/ (accessed 20 January 2019).Google Scholar
Doumit, N., Huet, G. and Fortin, C. (2013), The Role of Enterprise Social Media in the Development of Aerospace Industry Best Practices, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 356–364.Google Scholar
Eppinger, S.D. and Browning, T.R. (2012), Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications, MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ESA. (2013), Space Science: How a mission is chosen, available at: https://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Science/How_a_mission_is_chosen (accessed 20 February 2019).Google Scholar
Gebala, D. and Eppinger, S. (1991), “Methods for Analyzing Design Procedures”, Design Theory and Methodology, Vol. 31, pp. 227–233.Google Scholar
Göhlich, D., Hildebrand, S. and Schellert, D.D. (2018), Augmented DSM Sequencing to Support Product Development Planning, pp. 1139–1148.Google Scholar
Knoll, D., Fortin, C. and Golkar, A. (2018), “Review of Concurrent Engineering Design practice in the space sector: state of the art and future perspectives”, 2018 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE), IEEE, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
Knoll, D. and Golkar, A. (2017), “A coordination method for concurrent design and a collaboration tool for parametric system models”, Concurrent Engineering, SAGE PublicationsSage UK: London, England, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, G.L. (2016), NewSpace: The Emerging Commercial Space Industry, International Space University, available at: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20160001188Google Scholar
NASA (2017), NASA Systems Engineering Handbook, SP-2016-6105 Rev2., 12th Media Services, available at: https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/nasa_systems_engineering_handbook_0.pdf.Google Scholar
Shankar, P., Morkos, B. and Summers, J.D. (2012), “Reasons for change propagation: a case study in an automotive OEM”, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thumm, B.R. and Goehlich, D. (2015), “Product architecture design methodology for developing standardized modules”, DS 80-7 Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15) Vol 7: Product Modularisation, Product Architecture, Systems Engineering, Product Service Systems, 27-30 July 2015, Milan, Italy, pp. 175–184.Google Scholar
Ullah, I., Tang, D. and Yin, L. (2015), “Engineering Change Implications on Product Design: A Review of the Literature”, Conference: International Conference on Education, Management and Computing Technology (ICEMCT-15), Atlantis Press, Tianjin, pp. 1679–1691.Google Scholar
“Valispace - Product” (n.d.), Simon Vanden Bussche, available at: https://www.valispace.com/product/ (accessed 29 January 2019).Google Scholar
Walden, D.D. et al. (2015), Systems Engineering Handbook : A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities, 4th edition, available at: https://www.worldcat.org/title/systems-engineering-handbook-a-guide-for-system-life-cycle-processes-and-activities-incose-tp-2003-002-04-2015/oclc/931708827 (accessed 22 May 2019).Google Scholar
de Weck, O. (2010), ESD.36 System Project Management: Managing Iterations with DSM, available at: https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/engineering-systems-division/esd-36-system-project-management-fall-2012/lecture-notes/MITESD_36F12_Lec05.pdf (accessed 23 May 2019).Google Scholar