Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T13:04:47.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

AUTONOMOUS SHUTTLES FOR URBAN MOBILITY ON DEMAND APPLICATIONS – ECOSYSTEM DEPENDENT REQUIREMENT ELICITATION

Part of: Design Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

A. Grahle ,
Y.-W. Song ,
K. Brüske ,
B. Bender  and
D. Göhlich
A. Grahle*
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Berlin, Germany
Y.-W. Song
Affiliation:
Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany
K. Brüske
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Berlin, Germany
B. Bender
Affiliation:
Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany
D. Göhlich
Affiliation:
Technische Universität Berlin, Germany
*
*alexander.grahle@tu-berlin.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Future transport will change drastically with the introduction of automated vehicles. Here, Autonomous Mobility on Demand (AMoD) will play a major role, requiring a radical change of vehicle design, with many different conceivable concepts. This technology shift holds high potentials and high risks. Uncertainties about future usage profiles, operator and customer requirements have to be dealt with. An approach to elicit initial requirements for future vehicle concepts considering the entire ecosystem is introduced. The applicability is shown for a specific urban mobility scenario.

Keywords

autonomus mobilityurban transportrequirements managementearly design phasedecision making
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 887 - 896
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Albers, A., Bursac, N. and Wintergerst, E. (2015), “Product generation development-importance and challenges from a design research perspective”, New developments in mechanics and mechanical engineering, Vienna, pp. 16–21.Google Scholar
Barthelmes, S., Czeh, A. and Guo, Y. (2017), Autonomes Fahren Erwartungen an die Mobilität der Zukunft, Dornier Consulting International, Berlin.Google Scholar
Basu, R. et al. (2018), “Automated Mobility-on-Demand vs. Mass Transit: A Multi-Modal Activity-Driven Agent-Based Simulation Approach”, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018, pp. 608–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bischoff, J. and Maciejewski, M. (2016), “Simulation of City-wide Replacement of Private Cars with Autonomous Taxis in Berlin”, Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 83, pp. 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, P., Hines, A. and Collins, T. (2007), “The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques”, Foresight, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680710727516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, B. and Kietzmann, J. (2014), “Ride On! Mobility Business Models for the Sharing Economy”, Organization & Environment, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614546199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorst, K. and Cross, N. (2001), “Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution”, Design Studies, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, C.M., Alink, T. and Albers, A. (2010), “Issue driven analysis of an existing product at different levels of abstraction”, Proceedings of the DESIGN 2010, the 11th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, Glasgow, The Design Society, pp. 673–682.Google Scholar
Färber, B. (2015), “Kommunikationsprobleme zwischen autonomen Fahrzeugen und menschlichen Fahrern”, In: Maurer, M., Gerdes, J.C., Lenz, B. and Winner, H. (Eds.), Autonomes Fahren, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45854-9_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flügge, B. (2016), Smart Mobility, Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14371-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gausemeier, J., Fink, A. and Schlake, O. (1998), “Scenario Management”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 59 No. 2, pp. 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(97)00166-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Göhlich, D. et al. (2018), “Design of urban electric bus systems”, Design Science, Vol. 4 No. p. e15. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2018.10Google Scholar
Göhlich, D., Fay, T.-A. and Park, S. (2019), “Conceptual Design of Urban E-Bus Systems with Special Focus on Battery Technology”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 2823–2832. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.289Google Scholar
Graessler, I., Hentze, J. and Scholle, P. (2016), “Enhancing systems engineering by scenario-based anticipation of future developments”, SoSE and cyber physical systems (CPS), from academia to application and back, Piscataway, NJ, IEEE. pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSOSE.2016.7542938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gräßler, I. and Scholle, P. (2016), “Enhancing scenario technique by time-variant impacts”, DS 84: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2016 14th International Design Conference, Design Society, pp. 1005–1014.Google Scholar
Guerra, E. (2016), “Planning for Cars That Drive Themselves”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X15613591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensley, R., Padhi, A. and Salazar, J. (2017), Cracks in the ridesharing market and how to fill them. [online] Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/cracks-in-the-ridesharing-market-and-how-to-fill-them (accessed 1 July 2019).Google Scholar
Hulse, L.M., Xie, H. and Galea, E.R. (2018), “Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age”, Safety Science, Vol. 102, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KBA (2019), Bestand am 1. Januar 2019 nach Zulassungsbezirken und Gemeinden. [online] Available at: https://www.kba.de/DE/Statistik/Fahrzeuge/Bestand/ZulassungsbezirkeGemeinden/zulassungsbezirke_node.html (accessed 14 November 2019).Google Scholar
Kyriakidis, M., Happee, R. and Winter, J.C.F.D. (2015), “Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents”, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 32, pp. 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laamanen, T. (2017), “Reflecting on the past 50 years of Long Range Planning and a research agenda for the next 50”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leich, G. and Bischoff, J. (2018), Should autonomous shared taxis replace buses? A simulation study, Berlin.Google Scholar
Lin, P. (2015), “Why Ethics Matters for Autonomous Cars”, In: Maurer, M., Christian Gerdes, J. and Lenz, B. (Eds.), Autonomes Fahren: Technische, rechtliche und gesellschaftliche Aspekte, Springer, Berlin, pp. 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45854-9_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, H. and Hastings, D. (2006), “A framework for understanding uncertainty and its mitigation and exploitation in complex systems”, IEEE Engineering Management Review, Vol. 34 No. 3, p. 81.https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2006.261384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muschik, S. (2011), Development of Systems of Objectives in Early Product Engineering, [PhD thesis], Karlsruher Institut für Technologie.Google Scholar
Nobis, C. and Kuhnimhof, T. (2018), Mobilität in Deutschland – MiD Ergebnisbericht, Bonn, Berlin.Google Scholar
Pakusch, C. et al. (2018), “Unintended Effects of Autonomous Driving: A Study on Mobility Preferences in the Future”, Sustainability, Vol. 10 No. 7, p. 2404. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohl, K. and Rupp, C. (2016), Requirements engineering fundamentals: A study guide for the certified professional for requirements engineering exam foundation level - IREB compliant, Rocky Nook, Santa Barbara, CA.Google Scholar
Randt, N.P. (2015), “An approach to product development with scenario planning: The case of aircraft design”, Futures, Vol. 71, pp. 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAE International (2018), SAE J3016: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles, SAE International.Google Scholar
Schreurs, M.A. and Steuwer, S.D. (2015), “Autonomous Driving - Political, Legal, Social, and Sustainability Dimensions”, In: Maurer, M., Gerdes, J.C., Lenz, B. and Winner, H. (Eds.), Autonomes Fahren, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45854-9_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Y.-W., Herzog, M. and Bender, B. (2019a), “Understanding the Initial Requirements Definition in Early Design Phases”, Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 3751–3760. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.382Google Scholar
Song, Y.-W., Kossack, F. and Bender, B. (2019b), “Methodisches Entwickeln von Anforderungen in der Produktentwicklung”, DFX 2019: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.35199/dfx2019.11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UITP (2017), Autonomous vehicles: A Potential game changer for urban mobility. [online] Available at: https://www.uitp.org/news/autonomous-vehicles-urban-mobility (accessed 14 November 2019).Google Scholar
United Nations (2018), World Urbanization Prospects, New York.Google Scholar
van Audenhove, F.-J., Rominger, G. and Korn, A. (2018), The Future of Mobility 3.0, Arthur D. Little.Google Scholar
van Notten, P.W.F. et al. (2003), “An updated scenario typology”, Futures, Vol. 35 No. 5, pp. 423–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(02)00090-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VDI (2018), VDI 2221 - Blatt 2: Entwicklung technischer Produkte und Systeme - Gestaltung individueller Produktentwicklungsprozesse, Beuth Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wachenfeld, W. et al. (2015), “Use-Cases des autonomen Fahrens”, In: Maurer, M., Christian Gerdes, J. and Lenz, B. (Eds.), Autonomes Fahren: Technische, rechtliche und gesellschaftliche Aspekte, Springer, Berlin, pp. 9–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45854-9_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winner, H. and Wachenfeld, W. (2015), “Auswirkungen des autonomen Fahrens auf das Fahrzeugkonzept”, In: Maurer, M. et al. (Hg.). (Ed.), Autonomes Fahren, pp. 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45854-9_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar