Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-sq2k7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-11T20:23:26.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selection of diets differing in sulphur content by sheep in sulphur adequate or depleted states

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2021

J. Hills ,
J.V. Nolan ,
G.N. Hinch  and
J.J. Lynch
J. Hills
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
J.V. Nolan
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
G.N. Hinch
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
J.J. Lynch
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
Get access

Extract

Recent studies have shown that when offered a choice of feeds with different concentrations of a particular nutrient (crude protein), sheep can select a diet that meets their current requirements (Kyriazakis and Oldham 1993). To further examine this diet selection behaviour a choice of foods differing in the concentration of S was offered to sheep that were either in a sulphur (S) adequate or a S depleted state. Study of S selection was considered to be the next logical step after protein because of its role in the synthesis of proteins by the rumen micro-organisms.

Information

Type
Programme
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 1998 , 1998 , pp. 28
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Kyriazakis, I. and Oldham, J.D. (1993). Diet selection in sheep: the ability of growing lambs to select a diet that meets their crude protein (nitrogen x 6.25) requirements. British Journal of Nutrition 69: 617–629 10.1079/BJN19930064CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed