Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-scsgl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-11T14:38:12.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of rearing environment on behavioural characteristics of growing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2021

V.E. Beattie  and
N. Walker
V.E. Beattie
Affiliation:
Agricultural research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR, Northern Ireland
N. Walker
Affiliation:
Agricultural research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR, Northern Ireland
Get access

Extract

Behavioural types in pigs have been demonstrated by Hessing et al. (1994) who suggested that differing coping strategies may be determined by genetic constitution. However Beattie et al. (1995) found that pigs reared in enriched environments behaved differently in an open field test compared with those reared in barren environments implicating an environmental influence in strategy development. The objective of this study was to investigate whether housing environment influences the coping strategy of growing pigs measured by behavioural and physiological responses.

Information

Type
Programme
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 1997 , 1997 , pp. 42
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Beattie, V.E., Walker, N. and Sneddon, I.A. 1995. Effect of rearing environment and change of environment on the behaviour of gilts. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 46: 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hessing, M.J.C., Hagelso, A.M., Schouten, W.G.P., Wiepkema, P.R. and Van Beek, J.A.M. 1994. Individual Behavioural and Physiological Strategies in Pigs. Physiology and Behaviour, 55: 39–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed