Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-rz4zl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-03T07:50:49.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The techniques and technical problems associated with the processing of naturally and artificially dried forage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

G. Shepperson ,
W. T. B. Marchant ,
R. J. Wilkins  and
W. F. Raymond
G. Shepperson
Affiliation:
National Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Silsoe, Bedford
W. T. B. Marchant
Affiliation:
National Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Silsoe, Bedford
R. J. Wilkins
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Berks.
W. F. Raymond
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Berks.
Get access

Extract

The principal objective to date in packaging dried forages into wafers, cobs or pellets has been to improve handling and storage. Over 80% of the dried forage produced in the UK is still used as a component in pig and poultry rations, for which a milled and pelleted product is the most suitable. However there is evidence that the different forms of package are not of the same nutritive value to ruminants. With the increasing interest in the use of dried forages for ruminant feeding it is important to examine packaging in these dual rôles, as both mechanical and nutritional treatments.

Information

Type
53rd Meeting, London, 5 to 7 March 1971 Symposium: Processing of Roughages
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production (1972) , Volume 1 , January 1972 , pp. 40 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 1967a. Recommendation ASAE R 2461. Method of determining modulus of uniformity and modulus of fineness of ground feed. ASAE Yearbook, p. 301.]Google Scholar
American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 1967b. ASAE Standard S269.1. Wafers, pellets and crumbles. Definitions and methods for determining specific weight, durability and moisture content. ASAE Yearbook, p. 269.Google Scholar
Balk, W. A. 1965. Factors affecting pellet-mill performance with Coastal Bermuda grass. Trans. Am. Soc. agric. Engrs. 532–534.Google Scholar
Bezruchkin, I. B. 1958. [Investigation of the process of pelleting grassmeal.] J. agric Engng.Res. 3: 267–271.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K.L. and Graham, N. McC. 1956. The effect of the grinding and cubing process on the utilization of the energy of dried grass. J. agric. Sci. Camb. 47: 207–217.Google Scholar
Bruhn, H.D., and Zimmerman, A. and Niedermeir, R. P. 1959. Developments in pelleting forage crops. Agric. Engng St Joseph. Mich. 40: 204–206.Google Scholar
Bushmeyer, R. W., Krausf, D. F. and Rath, C. J. 1970. Developing a roll wafering machine. Progress report. Agric. Engng St Joseph. Mich. 51: 405–407.Google Scholar
Butler, J. L. 1962. A theory of wafering. Proc. Seminar on Wafering, 1962. Chicago, Massey Ferguson.Google Scholar
Butler, J. L. and Mccolly, H. F. 1959. Factors affecting the pelleting of hay. Agric. Engng St Joseph. Mich. 40: 442–446.Google Scholar
Chancellor, W. J. 1962. Formation of hay wafers with impact loads. Agric. Engng St Joseph. Mich. 43: 136–138.Google Scholar
Chaplin, R. V. and Tetlow, R. M. 1971. The storage of dried grass and lucerne wafers. J. Stored Prod. Res. 7: 171–180.Google Scholar
Hall, C. E. and Hall, C. W. 1968. Heated-die wafer formation of alfalfa and Bermuda grass. Trans. Am. Soc. agric. Engrs. 578–581.Google Scholar
Hughes, M. 1967. Sieve tests on dried grass wafers. NIAE DN/7/HCD/67.Google Scholar
LindsaYy, R. T. and Chaplin, R. V. 1970. Preliminary investigations on the storage of dried grass and lucerne wafers. J. Stored Prod. Res. 6: 79–88.Google Scholar
Marchant, W. T. B. 1970. The design of an experimental rotary press. NIAE DN/HCD/ 047/1715.Google Scholar
Matthies, H. J. 1969. Entwicklungstudenzen auf dem Gebiet der Halmfuttertechnik. Proc. 3rd Gen. Meeting Europ. Grassld Fed.pp. 315–325.Google Scholar
Minson, D. J. 1963. The effect of pelleting and wafering on the feeding value of roughage– a review. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 18: 39–44.Google Scholar
Neimann-Sørensen, A. 1969. Artificially dried grass products as feed for dairy cows. Proc. 3rd Gen. Meeting Europ. Grassld Fed. pp. 105–112.Google Scholar
Pickard, G. E., Roll, W. M. and Ramser, J. H. 1961. Fundamentals of hay wafering. Trans. Am. Soc. agric. Engrs. 65–68.Google Scholar
Reece, F. N. 1966. Temperature, pressure and time relationships in forming dense hay wafers. Trans. Am. Soc. agric. Engrs. 749–751.Google Scholar
Rehkugler, G. E. and Buchele, W. F. 1969. Biomechanics of forage wafering. Trans. Am. Soc. agric. Engrs. 1–8, 12.Google Scholar
Soteropulos, G. and De Buhr, H. 1969. Cubing—past, present and future. Agric. Engng St Joseph. Mich. 50: 516–518.Google Scholar
Tayler, J. C. 1970. Dried forages and beef production. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 25: 180–190.Google Scholar
Tetlow, R. M. and Wilkins, R. J. 1972. The influence of package size and density on voluntary intake of dried grass wafers fed to lambs. Anim. Prod. 14: 335–341.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. J., Armstrong, D. G. and Prescott, J. H. D. 1969. Influence of physical structure on the utilization of dried grass and silage. Proc. 3rd Gen. Meeting Europ. Grassld Fd. pp. 253–258.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J., Lonsdale, C. R., Tetlow, R. M. and Forrest, T. J. 1972. The voluntary intake and digestibility by cattle and sheep of dried grass wafers containing particles of differing size. Anim. Prod. 14: 177–188.Google Scholar