No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
1 See Spivak, Gayatri, Can the Subaltern Speak?, in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (Nelson, Cary & Grossberg, Lawrence eds., 1988)Google Scholar.
2 See, e.g., Fineman, Martha, Feminist Theory in Law: The Difference it Makes, Colum. J. Gender & L. (1992)Google Scholar; Fineman, Martha, The Neutered Mother, The Sexual Family, and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies (Routledge 1995)Google Scholar; Conaghan, J., Reassessing the Feminist Theoretical Project in Law, 27 J. L. Soc’y 351 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
3 The dynamic of “running hard to stand still” succinctly captured in Smart, Carol, Feminism and Law: Some Problems of Analysis and Strategy, 14 Int’L J. Soc. L. 109, 109-123 (1986)Google Scholar.
4 Conaghan, supra note 2.
5 Hudson, Barbara, Restorative Justice and Gendered Violence: Diversion or Effective Justice?, 42 Brit. J. Criminology 616, 616-634 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hopkins, C.Q. & Koss, M.P., Incorporating Feminist Theory and Insights into a Restorative Justice Response to Sex Offenses, Violence Against Women, Spring 2005, 693-723 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
6 See, e.g., Samuels, Harriet, Feminist Activism, Third Party Interventions and the Courts, Feminist Legal Stud. 15, 15-42 (2006)Google Scholar.
7 Lacey, Nicola, Unspeakable Subjects: Feminist Essays in Legal and Social Theory 97 (Hart Publishing 1998)Google Scholar.
8 Schneider, Elizabeth M, Battered Women and Feminist Lawmakers (Yale University Press 2000)Google Scholar.
9 Roth, Brad R., Governmental Illegitimacy in International Law (Oxford University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Engle, Karen, Symposium: Comparative Vision of Global Public Order, Liberal Internationalism, Feminism, and the Suppression of Critique: Contemporary Approaches to Global Order in the United States, 46 Harv. Int’l L. J., 427 (2005)Google Scholar.
11 Sayeed, Almas, Making Political Hay of Sex and Slavery: Kansas Conservatism and the Global Regulation of Sexual Moralities, 83 Feminist Review, 119-131 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 Symposium, Population Council ‘s Lessons Learnedfrom Over a Decade of Evaluating Approaches to Encourage Abandonment of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) (Feb. 6, 2008), available at <http://www.popcouncil.org/mediacenter/events/2008fgczerotoleranceagenda.html>.
13 See Obiora, L. Amede, Bridges and Barricades: Rethinking Polemics and Intransigence in the Campaign against Female Circumcision, 47 Case W. Res. L. Rev., 275, 275-378 (1997)Google Scholar; Gunning, Isabelle, Uneasy Alliances and Solid Sisterhood: A Response to Professor Obiora’s Bridges and Barricades, 47 Case W. Res. L. Rev., 445, 445-459 (1997)Google Scholar (for a more sympathetic account).
14 At, 24 I&N Dec. 296 (BIA 2007), Interim Decision #3584, September 27, 2007; and Ak, 24 I&N Dec. 275 (BIA 2007).
15 For an overview of these developments, see Bell, Christine & O’Rourke, Catherine, Does Feminism Need a Theory of Transitional Justice? An Introductory Essay, 1 Int’L J. Transit’L L., 23, 23-44 (2007)Google Scholar.
16 Chinkin, Christine, Rape and Sexual Abuse in International Law, 5 Eur. J. Int’l L., 3261, 326-341 (1994)Google Scholar.