Hostname: page-component-5447f9dfdb-9hml6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-30T04:26:22.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gravity Rhetoric: The Good, the Bad, and the “Political”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Margaret M. deGuzman
Margaret M. deGuzman*
Affiliation:
Beasley School of Law, Temple University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
The Tension Between Law and Politics: Can the ICC Navigate a Multipolar World?
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 107 , 2013 , pp. 421 - 423
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 deGuzman, Margaret M., The International Criminal Court’s Gravity Jurisprudence at Ten, Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev. (forthcoming 2013)Google Scholar; deGuzman, Margaret M., How Serious Are International Crimes? The Gravity Problem in International Criminal Law, 51 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 18 (2012)Google Scholar; deGuzman, Margaret M., Choosing to Prosecute: Expressive Selection at the International Criminal Court, 33 Mich. J. Int’l L. 265 (2012)Google Scholar; deGuzman, Margaret M., Gravity and the Legitimacy of the International Criminal Court, 32 Fordham Int’l L J. 1400 (2009)Google Scholar.