Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-25T19:45:34.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Chad Cameroon Pipeline Project (CCPP) and the Dilemmas of the Government of Chad

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Stefaan Smis  and
Stephen S. Kingah
Stefaan Smis
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit Brussels (VUB)
Stephen S. Kingah
Affiliation:
Institute for European Studies (IES); Vrije Universiteit Brussels (VUB); United Nations University—Comparative Regional Integration Studies Bruges
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Africa: A New Voices Panel
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 101 , 2007 , pp. 141 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Law No. 02/PR/2005 on the Amendment of Law No. 001/PR/99, Jan. 11, 1999, relating to the Management of Oil Revenues; Law No. 016/PR/2000, Aug. 18, 2000, on the modification of Law No. 001/PR/99, Jan. 11, 1999.

2 Article V(d), Loan Agreement Between the Republic of Chad and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Loan No. 4558 CD, 21 (revised Mar. 29, 2001).

3 Pegg, Scott, Can Policy Intervention Beat the Resource Curse? Evidence from the Chad-Cameroon Pipeline Project, 105 Ara. Aff. 1-25, 8 (2005)Google Scholar.

4 Charterer (Liberia) v. Owner (Russian Fed.), Final Award, XXVII Y.B. Com. Arb. 170-80 (2002); Seller (Cent. Europe) v. Buyer (West. Europe), Final Award, XXIX Y.B. Com. Arb. 13-25 (2004).

5 Krasner, Stephen D. The Hole in the Whole: Sovereignty, Shared Sovereignty and International Law, 25 Mich. J. Int’l. L. 1075-1101 (2004)Google Scholar; Sharing Sovereignty: New Institutions for Collapsed and Failed States, 29 Int’L Security 85-120, 112 (Fall 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Slaughter, Anne-Marie & Burke-White, William, The Future of International Law is Domestic (or, The European Way of Law), 47 Harv. Int’l L. J. 350, 327-352 (2006)Google Scholar.