We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
1.Iserson, KV: Law versus life: The ethical imperative to practice and teach using the newly dead emergency department patient. Ann Emmerg Med1995;25:91–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2
2.Brattebo, G, Wisbor, T, Oyen, N: Correspondence, Using newly decreased patients in teaching procedures. N Engl J Med1995;332:1445.Google Scholar
3
3.Iserson, KV: Correspondence, Using newly deceased patients in teaching procedures. N Engl J Med1995;332:1445–1446.Google ScholarPubMed
4
4.Burns, JP, Reardon, FE, Truog, RD: Using newly deceased patients to teach resuscitation procedures. N Engl J Med1994;331:1652–1655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5
5.Goldblatt, AD: Don't ask, don't tell: Practicing minimally invasive resuscitation techniques on the newly dead. Ann Emerg Med1995;25:86–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6
6.Morhaim, DK, Heller, MB: The practice of teaching endotracheal intubation on recently deceased patients. J Emerg Med1991;9:515–518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7
7.Olsen, J, Spilger, S, Windisch, T: Feasibility of obtaining family consent for teaching cricothyrotomy on the newly dead in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med1995;25:660–665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8
8.McNamara, RM, Monti, S, Kelly, JJ: Requesting consent for an invasive procedure in newly deceased adults. JAMA1995;273:310–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed