Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-qc88w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-24T02:21:16.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantitative mineraiogical analyses of carbonate rich sediments by X-ray powder diffraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2013

A. M. Mansour ,
W. E. Piller  and
C. L. Lengauer
A. M. Mansour
Affiliation:
Geology Department, Qena Faculty of Science, 83511 Qena, Egypt
W. E. Piller
Affiliation:
Institut f. Paläontologie, Universitàt Wien, Universitätstrasse 7, A-1010 Wien, Austria
C. L. Lengauer
Affiliation:
Institut f. Mineralogie und Kristallographie, Universität Wien, Dr. Karl Lueger-Ring 1, A-1010 Wien, Austria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The quantitative analysis of carbonate rich materials is tested with conventional and Rietveld methods. In the case of artificial mixtures of aragonite, calcite, Mg-calcite and quartz the Rietveld method provides reliable results with a maximum deviation of ±5 wt %. In the natural samples, however, the conventional methods give more reliable results in comparison to chemical and sedimentological measurements. This is caused by the peak overlap of calcite/Mg-calcite, peak roadening of the Mg-calcite, and the difficulties in the refinement of minor amounts of feldspar phases.

Keywords

Quantitative powder diffractioncarbonate analysisRietveld refinement

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , June 1995 , pp. 112 - 116
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bérar, J.F., and Lelann, P. (1991). “E.S.D.'s and estimated probable errors obtained in Rietveld refinements with local correlations,” J. Appl. Cryst. 24, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bish, D.L., and Howard, S.A. (1988). “Quantitative phase analysis using the Rietveld method,” J. Appl. Cryst. 21, 86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bish, D.L., and Post, J.E. (1993). “Quantitative mineralogical analysis using the Rietveld full pattern fitting method,” Am. Mineral. 78, 932–940.Google Scholar
Bowden, M.E., and Ryan, M.J. (1991). “Comparison of intensities from fixed to variable divergence X-ray diffraction experiments,” Powder Diffr. 6, 78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caglioti, G., Paoletti, A., and Ricci, F.P. (1958). “Choice of collimators for a crystal spectrometer for neutron diffraction,” Nucl. Inst. 3, 223–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollase, W.A. (1986). “Corrections of intensities for preferred orientation in powder diffractometry: application of the March model,” J. Appl. Cryst. 19, 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, J.H., and Zevin, L. (1985). “Quantitative X-ray diffractometry of carbonate rocks,” J. Sediment. Petrol. 55, 611–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R.X. (1993). “Divergence slit corrections for Bragg Brentano diffractometers,” Third European Powder Diffraction Conference, Abstr. 25, Vienna.Google Scholar
Fischer, R.X., Lengauer, C.L., Tillmanns, E., Ensink, R.J., Reiss, C.A., and Fantner, E.J. (1993). “PC-Rietveld plus, a comprehensive Rietveld analysis package for PC,” Mater. Sci. Forum 133–136, 287–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavish, E., and Friedman, G.M. (1973). “Quantitative analysis of calcite and Mg-calcite by X-ray diffraction: effect of grinding an peak height and peak area,” Sedimentology 20, 437–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gevirtz, J.L., and Friedman, G.M. (1966). “Deep-sea carbonate sediments of the Red Sea and their implifications on marine lithification,” J. Sediment Petrol. 36, 143–151.Google Scholar
Gunatilaka, H.A., and Till, R. (1971). “A precise and accurate method for the quantitative determination of carbonate minerals by X-ray diffraction using a spiking technique,” Mineral Mag. 38, 481–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R.J., Howard, C.J. (1987). “Quantitative phase analysis from neutron powder diffraction data using the Rietveld method,” J. Appl. Cryst. 20, 467–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hovestreydt, E. (1983). “On the atomic scattering factor for O2,” Acta Cryst. A 39, 268–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, F.T., Bischoff, W.D., Bishop, F.C., M., Loijens, Schoonmaker, J., and Wollast, R. (1983). “Magnesian calcites: low temperature occurrence, solubility and solid-solution behavior,” in Mineralog. Soc. Am.: Rev. Mineral. 11, 97–144.Google Scholar
Martinez, B., and Plana, F. (1987). “Quantitative X-ray diffraction of carbonate sediments: mineralogical analysis through fitting of Lorentzian profiles to diffraction peaks,” Sedimentology 34, 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milliman, J.D. (1973). Marine Carbonates (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg).Google Scholar
Milliman, J.D., and Bornhold, B.D. (1973). “Peak height versus peak intensity analysis of X-ray diffraction data,” Sedimentology 20, 445–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milliman, J.D., Ross, D.A., and Ku, Teh-Lung (1969). “Precipitation and lithification of deep-sea carbonates in the Red Sea,” J. Sediment Petrol. 39, 724–736.Google Scholar
Rietveld, H.M. (1969). “A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures,” J. Appl. Cryst. 2, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roselle, P. (1982). “Quantitative mineralogical analysis of carbonate sediments by X-ray diffraction: a new, automatic method for sediments with low carbonate content,” Sedimentology 29, 595–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Synder, R.L., and Bish, D.L. (1989). “Quantitative analysis,” in Mineralog. Soc. Am.: Rev. Mineral. 20, 101–144.Google Scholar
Speer, J.A. (1983). “Crystal chemistry and phase relations of orthorhombic carbonates,” in Mineralog. Soc. Am.: Rev. Mineral. 11, 145–190.Google Scholar
Tennant, C.B., and Berger, R.W. (1957). “X-ray determination of dolomitecalcite ratios of a carbonate rock,” Am. Mineral. 42, 23–29.Google Scholar
Young, R.A., and Wiles, D.B. (1982). “Profile shape functions in Rietveld refinement,” J. Appl. Cryst. 15, 430–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar