Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-dk7s8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T23:18:11.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantitative Rietveld analysis of hydrated cementitious systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2012

L. D. Mitchell ,
J. C. Margeson  and
P. S. Whitfield
L. D. Mitchell
Affiliation:
Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council Canada, 1200 Montreal Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R6, Canada
J. C. Margeson
Affiliation:
Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council Canada, 1200 Montreal Road, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R6, Canada
P. S. Whitfield
Affiliation:
Institute for Chemical Process and Environmental Technology, National Research Council Canada, 1200 Montreal Road, Ottawa, Ontario KlA 0R6, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A study examining the feasibility, and possible necessity, of using transmission data from capillary mounted samples for quantitative analysis of hydrated cement systems was conducted. In order to obtain true quantitative results, the amorphous contents were determined by the addition of an internal standard. The amorphous content of the starting tricalcium silicate was found to be approximately 21–22 wt %, in close agreement with previously published results. The study revealed that the spherical harmonics preferential orientation correction may not be reliable with unmicronized hydrated cement materials in reflection geometry, as chemically unreasonable progressions in Portlandite content with time were observed. The data obtained from capillary measurements, however, exhibited little or no preferential orientation, and appeared to produce the progression of phase contents expected from the reaction. The use of capillaries would appear to be justified in some circumstances to obtain reliable quantitative results from hydrated cementitious materials. In this particular system, a significant fraction of calcium carbonate was present as aragonite, as well as the more usual calcite.

Information

Type
X-Ray Diffraction
Information
Powder Diffraction , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , June 2006 , pp. 111 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Cheary, R. W. and Coelho, A. A. (1992). J. Appl. Crystallogr. JACGAR 10.1107/S0021889891010804 25, 109–121.Google Scholar
De La Torre, A. G., Bruque, S., and Aranda, M. A. G. (2001). J. Appl. Crystallogr. JACGAR 10.1107/S0021889801002485 34, 196–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollase, W. A. (1986). J. Appl. Crystallogr. JACGAR 10.1107/S0021889886089458 19, 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, R. J. and Howard, C. J. (1987). J. Appl. Crystallogr. JACGAR 10.1107/S0021889887086199 20, 467–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rietveld, H. M. (1967). Acta Crystallogr. ACCRA9 10.1107/S0365110X67000234 22, 151–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarlett, N. V. Y., Madsen, I. C., Manias, C., and Retallack, D. (2001). Powder Diffr. PODIE2 10.1154/1.1359796 16, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitepu, H., O’Connor, B. H., and Li, D. (2005). J. Appl. Crystallogr. JACGAR 38, 158–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suherman, P. M., van Riessen, A., O’Connor, B., Bolton, D., and Fairhurst, H. (2002). Powder Diffr. PODIE2 10.1154/1.1471518 17, 178–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Dreele, R. B. (1997). J. Appl. Crystallogr. JACGAR 10.1107/S0021889897005918 30, 517–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitfield, P. S. and Mitchell, L. D. (2003). J. Mater. Sci. JAMSEF 38, 4415–4421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winburn, R. S., Grier, D. G., McCarthy, G. J., and Peterson, R. B. (2000). Powder Diffr. PODIE2 15, 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar