Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-b5cpw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-01T09:41:19.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

1325 at 25: What Is a Battered Tool Good For?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2025

Soumita Basu Open the ORCID record for Soumita Basu [Opens in a new window]
Soumita Basu*
Affiliation:
Department of International Relations, https://ror.org/02kjyst95 South Asian University , New Delhi, India
*
Email: sbasu@sau.ac.in
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In an early conversation on the relevance of United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1325, the resolution is described by Carol Cohn as presenting “an important tool to all of us who seek the empowerment of women and sustainable peace, and who believe that the two are interconnected,” and by Sheri Gibbings as a “tool to justify military occupation on behalf of ‘liberating’ women” (Cohn, Kinsella, and Gibbings 2004, 138–9). Both prospects have been borne out in the 25 years of the implementation of, and rhetoric relating to, UNSCR 1325 and the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda that emerged from the landmark resolution. There is substantive documentation of, and scholarship on, the implementation of the agenda (see, for example, Coomaraswamy 2015; Davies and True 2019). It is evident from this literature that the realization of feminist peace, which propelled civil society advocacy for the passage of UNSCR 1325, has not been the only driving factor behind this implementation. In practice, the WPS resolutions have been employed by a range of actors for varying purposes.

Information

Type
Critical Perspectives Article
Information
Politics & Gender , First View , pp. 1 - 7
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Women, Gender, and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Basu, Soumita. 2009. “Security Through Transformations: The Case of the Passage of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women and Peace and Security.” PhD diss. Aberystwyth University.Google Scholar
Basu, Soumita. 2016. “Gender as National Interest at the UN Security Council.” International Affairs 92 (2): 255–73.10.1111/1468-2346.12548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, Carol, and Enloe, Cynthia. 2003. “A Conversation with Cynthia Enloe: Feminists look at Masculinity and the Men who Wage War.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (4): 1187–207.10.1086/368326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, Carol, Kinsella, Helen, and Gibbings, Sheri. 2004. “Interviewing Felicity Hill, Maha Muna and Isha Dyfan ‘Women, Peace and Security: Resolution 1325.’” International Feminist Journal of Politics 6 (1): 130–40.10.1080/1461674032000165969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coomaraswamy, Radhika. 2015. Preventing Conflict, Transforming Justice, Securing the Peace: A Global Study on the Implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325. New York: UN Women.Google Scholar
Davies, Sara E., and True, Jacqui (eds). 2019. The Oxford Handbook of Women, Peace, and Security. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190638276.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drumond, Paula, and Rebelo, Tamya. 2020. “Global Pathways or Local Spins? National Action Plans in South America.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 22 (4): 462–84.10.1080/14616742.2020.1783339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, Anne Marie. 2020. “Foreword: Toward Strategic Instrumentalism.” In New Directions in Women, Peace and Security, eds. Basu, Soumita, Kirby, Paul, and Shepherd, Laura J., xxi–xxvi. Bristol: Bristol University Press.Google Scholar
Government of India. 2020. “India: UN Security Council Candidate 2021–2022. Ministry of External Affairs.” Accessed July 1, 2025. http://www.mea.gov.in/Images/amb1/INDIAUNSC.pdf.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Caitlin, Naam, Nyibenny, and Shepherd, Laura J.. 2020. “Twenty Years of Women, Peace and Security National Action Plans: Analysis and Lessons Learned.” The University of Sydney. Accessed July 1, 2025. https://www.wpsnaps.org/report/.Google Scholar
Kirby, Paul, and Shepherd, Laura J.. 2024. Governing the Feminist Peace: The Vitality and Failure of the Women, Peace, and Security Agenda. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/kirb20512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, Jana, Krause, Werner, and Bränfors, Piia. 2018. “Women’s Participation in Peace Negotiations and the Durability of Peace." International Interactions 44 (6): 985–1016.10.1080/03050629.2018.1492386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luck, Edward C. 2006. The UN Security Council: Practice and Promise. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203969335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manchanda, Rita. 2017. “Introduction.” In Women and Politics of Peace: South Asian Narratives on Militarization, Power and Justice, ed.Manchanda, Rita, xv–xl. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Motoyama, Hisako. 2018. “Formulating Japan’s UNSCR 1325 National Action Plan and Forgetting the ‘Comfort Women’.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 20 (1): 39–53.10.1080/14616742.2017.1413582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesiah, Vasuki. 2012. “Uncomfortable Alliances: Women, Peace and Security in Sri Lanka.” In South Asian Feminisms, eds. Loomba, Ania and Lukose, Ritty A., 139–61. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Otto, Diane. 2009. “The Security Council’s Alliance of Gender Legitimacy: The Symbolic Capital of Resolution 1325.” In Fault Lines of International Legitimacy, eds. Charlesworth, Hilary and Coicaud, Jean-Marc, 239–76. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511691614.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruby, Felicity. 2014. “Security Council Resolution 1325: A Tool for Conflict Prevention?” In Rethinking Peacekeeping, Gender Equality and Collective Security, eds. Heathcote, Gina and Otto, Dianne, 173–84. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar
Shepherd, Laura J., and True, Jacqui. 2014. “The Women, Peace and Security Agenda and Australian Leadership in the World: From Rhetoric to Commitment?” Australian Journal of International Affairs 68 (3): 257–84.10.1080/10357718.2014.903895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sievers, Loraine, and Daws, Sam. 2014. The Procedure of the UN Security Council, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199685295.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Security Council (UNSC). 2000. “Peace Inextricably Linked With Equality Between Women and Men Says Security Council, In International Women’s Day Statement.” Press Release. SC/6816. March 8.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council (UNSC). 2009. “Women and Peace and Security.” S/RES/1889. October 5.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council (UNSC). 2024. “Women and Peace and Security.” Report of the Secretary-General. S/2024/671. September 24.Google Scholar
Weiss, Cora. 2011. “We Must Not Make War Safe for Women.” 50:50 Inclusive Democracy. Accessed July 1, 2025. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/5050/we-must-not-make-war-safe-for-women/.Google Scholar
Whetstone, Crystal, and Luna, K.C. 2023. “Disrupting the Saviour Politics in the Women, Peace and Security Agenda in the Global South: Grassroots Women Creating Gender Norms in Nepal and Sri Lanka.” Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs 10 (1): 95–121.10.1177/23477970231152027CrossRefGoogle Scholar