Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tpknm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T08:40:41.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Through the ideology of the beholder: how ideology shapes perceptions of partisan groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2022

Jonathan Homola Open the ORCID record for Jonathan Homola [Opens in a new window] ,
Jon C. Rogowski ,
Betsy Sinclair ,
Michelle Torres ,
Patrick D. Tucker  and
Steven W. Webster Open the ORCID record for Steven W. Webster [Opens in a new window]
Jonathan Homola
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Rice University, Houston, USA
Jon C. Rogowski
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA
Betsy Sinclair
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Washington University, St Louis, USA
Michelle Torres
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Rice University, Houston, USA
Patrick D. Tucker
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Yale University, New Haven, USA
Steven W. Webster*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: swwebste@iu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Growing attitudinal and affective differences across party lines and increasing social polarization are often attributed to the strengthening of partisanship as a social identity. Scholars have paid less attention to personal preferences as a contributor to these phenomena. Our focus is on how citizens’ policy beliefs—their operational ideologies—are associated with their views of partisan groups. We examine our perspective with two studies. In the first, we find that the attribution of ideologically extreme political views to an individual's peer significantly reduces interest in interpersonal interaction but find limited evidence that partisan group membership alone induces social polarization. In the second, we show that citizens’ policy views are strongly associated with their perceptions of their own partisan group as well as their counterpartisans. Together, our results have important implications for understanding the consequences of increased polarization and partisan antipathy in contemporary politics.

Keywords

American politicspolitical psychologypublic opinion
Type
Original Article
Information
Political Science Research and Methods , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , April 2023 , pp. 275 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abramowitz, AI and Webster, SW (2016) The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century. Electoral Studies 41, 12–22.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I and Webster, SW (2018) Negative partisanship: why Americans dislike parties but behave like rabid partisans. Advances in Political Psychology 39, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahler, DJ (2014) Self-fulfilling misperceptions of public polarization. Journal of Politics 76, 607–620.Google Scholar
Ahler, DJ and Sood, G (2018) The parties in our heads: misperceptions about party composition and their consequences. The Journal of Politics 80, 964–981.Google Scholar
Alduncin, A, Parker, DCW and Theriault, SM (2017) Leaving on a jet plane: polarization, foreign travel, and comity in congress. Congress & the Presidency 44, 179–200.Google Scholar
Ang, Z, Reeves, A, Rogowski, JC and Vishwanath, A (Forthcoming) Partisanship, economic assessments, and presidential accountability. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12659.Google Scholar
Berinsky, AJ (2018) Telling the truth about believing the lies? Evidence for the limited prevalence of expressive survey responding. Journal of Politics 80, 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broockman, DE (2016) Approaches to studying policy representation. Legislative Studies Quarterly 41, 181–215.Google Scholar
Bullock, JG (2011) Elite influence on public opinion in an informed electorate. American Political Science Review 105, 496–515.Google Scholar
Campbell, A, Converse, PE, Miller, WE and Stokes, DE (1960) The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Claassen, C, Tucker, P and Smith, SS (2015) Ideological labels in America. Political Behavior 37, 253–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, PJ and Feldman, S (1989) Candidate perception in an ambiguous world: campaigns, cues, and inference processes. American Political Science Review 33, 912–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desmarais, BA, Moscardelli, VG, Schaffner, BF and Kowal, MS (2015) Measuring legislative collaboration: the senate press events network. Social Networks 40, 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias, N and Lelkes, Y (Forthcoming) The nature of affective polarization: disentangling policy disagreement from partisan identity. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12628.Google Scholar
Druckman, JN and Levendusky, MS (2019) What do we measure when we measure affective polarization?. Public Opinion Quarterly 83, 114–122.Google Scholar
Druckman, JN, Klar, S, Krupnikov, Y, Levendusky, M and Ryan, JB (Forthcoming) (Mis-)Estimating affective polarization. Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1086/715603.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, AM and Utych, SM (2020) Grand old (Tailgate) Party? Partisan discrimination in apolitical settings. Political Behavior 42, 769–789.Google Scholar
Fiorina, MP (1981) Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, A (2020) Partisan intoxication or policy voting?. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 15, 141–179.Google Scholar
Gentzkow, M, Shapiro, JM and Taddy, M (2016) Measuring polarization in high-dimensional data: method and application to congressional speech. NBER Working Paper 22423.Google Scholar
Gerber, AS, Huber, GA and Washington, E (2010) Party affiliation, partisanship, and political beliefs: a field experiment. American Political Science Review 104, 720–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, MH and Svolik, MW (2020) Democracy in America? partisanship, polarization, and the robustness of support for democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review 114, 392–409.Google Scholar
Green, D, Palmquist, B and Schickler, E (2002) Partisan Hearts and Minds. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Homola, J (2021) Partisanship and perceived threats about immigration. Party Politics 27, 977–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, GA and Malhotra, N (2017) Political homophily in social relationships: evidence from online dating behavior. The Journal of Politics 79, 269–283.Google Scholar
Huddy, L, Mason, L and Aarøe, L (2015) Expressive partisanship: campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review 109, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S and Westwood, SJ (2015) Fear and loathing across party lines: new evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science 59, 690–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S, Sood, G and Lelkes, Y (2012) Affect, not ideology: a social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly 76, 405–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, S, Lelkes, Y, Levendusky, M, Malhotra, N and Westwood, SJ (2019) The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the united states. Annual Review of Political Science 22, 129–146.Google Scholar
Judd, CM and Park, B (1993) Definition and assessment of accuracy in social stereotypes. Psychological Review 100, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klar, S (2014) Identity and engagement among political independents in America. Political Psychology 35, 577–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klar, S and Krupnikov, Y (2016) Independent Politics: How American Disdain for Parties Leads to Political Inaction. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klar, S, Krupnikov, Y and Ryan, JB (2018) Affective polarization or partisan disdain?: Untangling a dislike for the opposing party from a dislikes of partisanship. Public Opinion Quarterly 82, 379–390.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, K (1993) Where's the party?. British Journal of Political Science 23, 235–266.Google Scholar
Lelkes, Y (2021) Policy over party: comparing the effects of candidate ideology and party on affective polarization. Political Science Research and Methods 9, 189–196.Google Scholar
Levendusky, M (2009) The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levendusky, MS and Malhotra, N (2016) (Mis)perceptions of partisan polarization in the American public. Public Opinion Quarterly 80, 378–391.Google Scholar
Malhotra, N and Kuo, AG (2008) Attributing blame: the public's response to Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Politics 70, 120–135.Google Scholar
Mason, L (2015) I disrespectfully agree’: the differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science 59, 128–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, C, Margalit, Y, Malhotra, N and Levendusky, M (2018) The economic consequences of partisanship in a polarized era. American Journal of Political Science 62, 5–18.Google Scholar
Orr, LV and Huber, GA (2020) The policy basis of measured partisan animosity in the United States. American Journal of Political Science 64, 569–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panagopoulos, C, Green, DP, Krasno, J, Schwam-Baird, M and Endres, K (2020) Partisan consumerism: experimental tests of consumer reactions to corporate political activity. The Journal of Politics 82, 996–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perner, Josef and Wimmer, Heinz (1985) John thinks that mary thinks that…’: attribution of second-order beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 39, 437–471.Google Scholar
Rogowski, Jon C and Sutherland, JL (2016) How ideology fuels affective polarization. Political behavior 38, 485–508.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, EE (1942) Party Government. New York: Rinehart & Company.Google Scholar
Simas, EN, Clifford, S and Kirkland, JH (2020) How empathic concern fuels political polarization. American Political Science Review 114, 258–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Boven, L, Judd, CM and Sherman, DK (2012) Political polarization projection: social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 103, 84–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, SW and Abramowitz, AI (2017) The ideological foundations of affective polarization in the U.S. electorate. American Politics Research 45, 621–647.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Homola et al. Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GB15Y5
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Homola et al. supplementary material

Homola et al. supplementary material

Download Homola et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 774.2 KB