Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-m259h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-01T16:56:31.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emotions, finances and independence. Uranium as a “happy object” in the Greenlandic debate on secession from Denmark

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2019

Kirsten Thisted Open the ORCID record for Kirsten Thisted [Opens in a new window]
Kirsten Thisted*
Affiliation:
Department of Cross-Cultural and Regional Studies, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
*
Author for correspondence: Kirsten Thisted, Email: thisted@hum.ku.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analysing the Danish-Greenlandic debate on Greenland’s plans to extract and export uranium, the article advocates bringing the fields of extraction studies and cultural studies into dialogue. Drawing on discourse analysis, critical theory and the “emotional turn” in social sciences, the article demonstrates how the current discussion about secession is linked to a Danish-Greenlandic affective economy instituted during the colonial era. Conceived as the antithesis to the unhappy condition of present postcoloniality, independence has become the ultimate political goal for the Greenlandic nation. The reasoning is that history has made the Greenlanders citizens in a foreign nation, which has left them in a state of alienation. In order to lock colonialism away firmly in the past and attain future happiness, the Greenlanders must attain statehood. Uranium is supposed to promote this goal and is thus circulated as a “happy object”, positioning opponents of uranium mining as “affect aliens” or “killjoys” in the independence discourse. In Denmark, the Greenlandic detachment has led to “postcolonial melancholia” – and to a greater receptiveness to the Greenland desire for equality. In Greenland, disappointed expectations of rapid economic progress and growing distrust of large-scale projects have sparked a discussion about the significations of the concept of “independence”.

Keywords

ExtractivismUraniumAffective economiesGreenlandPostcolonality

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Polar Record , Volume 56 , 2020 , e1
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahmed, S. (2004). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S. (2010). The Promise of Happiness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, A. N., & Thisted, K. (forthcoming). “Whatever a colony is”. 1945–1953 as a zero hour in Danish–Greenlandic relations. In Schulz-Forberg, H. (Ed.), Zero zours. Politics of time from global perspectives, 1940s–1970s. London, England/New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (1991) [1983]. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (Revised and extended edition). London, England: Verso.Google Scholar
Autogena, L., & Portway, J. (2017). Kuannersuit/Kvanefjeld. Documentary 28 min. https://vimeo.com/214697146.Google Scholar
Berlant, L. (2011): Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjørst, L. R. (2016). Saving or destroying the local community? Conflicting spatial storylines in the Greenlandic debate on uranium. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(1), 34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjørst, L. R. (2017). Uranium: The road to economic self-sustainability for Greenland? Changing uranium-positions in Greenlandic politics. In Fondahl, G., & Wilson, G. N. (Eds.), Northern sustainabilities: Understanding and addressing change in the circumpolar world (pp. 25–34). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breum, M. (2015). The Greenlandic dilemma. (Trans. Kevin McGwin). Published as free e-book, unpaged, Royal Danish Defence College. http://www.fak.dk/publikationer/Pages/TheGreenland-Dilemma.aspx. Accessed 17 March 2019.Google Scholar
Brink, P. (1997). Thulesagen, Løgnens Univers. Copenhagen, Denmark: Aschehoug.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, J. (2005). The Greenlandic version of self-government. In Wessendorf, K. (Ed.), An indigenous parliament? Realities and perspectives in Russia and the circumpolar North. Copenhagen, Denmark: IWGIA.Google Scholar
Danida (2011). Review Report: Strategy for Danish Support to Indigenous Peoples. 2001–2010. Copenhagen, Denmark: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark.Google Scholar
Davidson, J., Bondi, L., & Smith, M. (Eds.). (2005) Emotional Geographies. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Den danske Regering/Naalakkersuisut (2016). Aftale mellem den danske regering og Naalakkersuisut vedrørende de særlige udenrigs-, forsvars- og sikkerhedspolitiske forhold, der knytter sig til udvinding og eksport af uran og andre radioaktive stoffer i Grønland. Copenhagen, Denmark/Nuuk, Greenland. Grønlandsudvalget 2015-16 GRU Alm.del Bilag 33 Offentligt. https://www.ft.dk/samling/20151/almdel/GRU/bilag/33/1595416.pdf.Google Scholar
DR (Danish Broadcasting Corporation), DR2 (2013). Deadline (2013), 27 October 2013, 18:15–32:59.Google Scholar
Elkjær, K. (2018). Siumut-afdeling: Dansk involvering i lufthavne er kolonialisme. KNR Nyheder 27 September 2018. https://knr.gl/da/nyheder/dansk-involvering-i-lufthavne-er-kolonialisme. Accessed 17 March 2019.Google Scholar
Gad, U.P. (2017). National Identity Politics and Postcolonial Sovereignty Games – Greenland, Denmark, and the European Union. Copenhagen, Denmark: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
Gilroy, P. (2005). Postcolonial Melancholia. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. (1997). What Emotions Really Are. The Problems of Psychological Categories. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grønlandsk-dansk selvstyrekommission (2008). Grønlandsk-dansk selvstyrekommissions betænkning om selvstyre i Grønland. Copenhagen, Denmark/Nuuk, Greenland.Google Scholar
Gundel, P. (2004). Jeg danser af glæde. Dagbogsbreve 1923–1930. Udgivet ved Gudrun Tølbøll. Det grønlandske Selskabs Skrifter XXXVI. Copenhagen, Denmark: Det grønlandske Selskab.Google Scholar
Gunter, C. (2015). The case for uranium mining in Greenland. Cornell International Law Journal, 48(2), 423–449.Google Scholar
Hammond, A. (2013). Arctic Circle Presentation. Naalakkersuisut, Government of Greenland. [Link to text no longer available, but video available on VIMEO: https://vimeo.com/172177095. Accessed 17 March 2019.Google Scholar
Hecht, G. (2012). Being Nuclear. Africans and the Global Uranium Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, L. (2012). Danmark – rigsfællesskab, tropekolonier og den postkoloniale arv. Copenhagen, Denmark: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
Knudsen, H., & Nielsen, H. (2016). Uranbjerget. Om forsøgene på at finde og udnytte Grønlands uran fra 1944 til i dag. Copenhagen, Denmark: Forlaget Vandkunsten.Google Scholar
Koselleck, R. (2002). The Practice of Conceptual History, Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kristensen, K. (2013). Grønland har aldrig vedtaget en 0-tolerance. Sermitsiaq 42, 18 October 2013. https://sermitsiaq.ag/kl/node/159910. Accessed 17 March 2019.Google Scholar
Kühl, J. (2004). National minorities and cross-border cooperation between Denmark and Germany. Razprave in Gradivo – Treatises and Documents 44, 82–105.Google Scholar
Kuletz, V. (1998). The Tainted Desert: Environmental and Social Rule in the American West. London, England/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Larsen, S. T., & Pilskog, S. (2019). Winter’s Yearning. Documentary 77 min.Google Scholar
Lihn, A. G. (2018). Parti Naleraq har forladt koalisionen. KNR nyheder 9 September 2018. https://knr.gl/da/nyheder/partii-naleraq-har-forladt-koalitionen. Accessed 17 March 2019.Google Scholar
Lindstrøm, M. (2019). Råstofmesse i Canada: Pengene ruller ind senere. KNR 8 March 2019. https://knr.gl/da/nyheder/pengene-ruller-ind-senere. Accessed17 March 2019.Google Scholar
Lucht, H. (2018). Chinese investments in Greenland raise US concerns. Strictly business? DIIS Policy Brief, 19 November 2018. https://www.diis.dk/en/research/chinese-investments-in-greenland-raise-us-concerns. Accessed March 17, 2019.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. (2016) [1925]. The Gift. Expanded Edition. Selected, annotated, and translated by Jane I Guyer. Chicago IL: Hau Books.Google Scholar
Naalakkersuisut/Government of Greenland. (2016). Naalakkersuisooqatigiinnissamut isumaqatigiissut 2016–18. Siumut, Inuit Ataqatigiit, Partii Naleraq, 27 October 2016.Google Scholar
Naalakkersuisut/Government of Greenland. (2018). Naalakkersuisooqatigiinnissamut isumaqatigiissut. Siumut, Atassut, Nunatta Qitornai, 2 October 2018.Google Scholar
Naalakkersuisut/Government of Greenland. (2018). Naalakkersuisooqatigiit 2018. Siumut, Partii Naleraq, Atassut, Nunatta Qitornai, 4 May 2018.Google Scholar
Nielsen, N. S., & Petersen, J. H. (2018). Flertal af danskere vil beholde Grønland i Rigsfællesskabet. DR Nyheder 21 April 2018. Accessed 16 July 2019.Google Scholar
Nutall, M. (2017). Climate, Society and Subsurface Politics in Greenland: Under the Great Ice. London, England: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olwig, K. F. (2003). Narrating deglobalization. Danish perceptions of a lost empire. Global Networks, 3(3), 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Østergaard, U. (1996). Danmark og mindretallene i teori og praksis. In Kühl, J. (Ed.), Mindretalspolitik [Minority politics] (pp. 44–105). Copenhagen, Denmark: Dansk Udenrigspolitisk InstitutGoogle Scholar
Petersen, N. (2011). The Arctic challenge to Danish foreign and security policy. In Kraska, J. (Ed.), Arctic security in an age of climate change (pp. 145–165). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, R. K., & Merkelsen, H. (2017). Post-colonial governance through securitization? A narratological analysis of a securitization controversy in contemporary Danish and Greenlandic uranium policy. Politik, 20(3), 83–103.Google Scholar
Rosenwein, B. H. (2006). Emotional Communities in the Early Middle Ages. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Szeman, I., & Boyer, D. (2017). Introduction. On the energy humanities. In Sceman, I., & Boyer, D. (Eds.), Energy humanities. An anthology (pp. 1–14). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Schulz-Forberg, H. (2013). Introduction: Time and again towards the future: Claims on time as a new approach for global history. In Schulz-Forberg, H. (Ed.), Zero hours: Conceptual insecurities and new beginnings in the interwar period (pp. 15–49). Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Scott, D. (2004). Conscripts of Modernity. The Tragedy of Colonial Enlightenment. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sejersen, F. (2015). Rethinking Greenland and the Arctic in the Era of Climate Change: New Northern Horizons. London, England/New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, M., Davidson, J., Cameron, L., & Bondi, L. (Eds.) (2009). Emotion, Place and Culture. Farnham, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Statsministeriet: Act on Greenland self-government. Act no. 473 of 12 June 2009.Google Scholar
Stauning, T. (1930). Min Grønlandsfærd. Copenhagen, Denmark: Jespersen og Pio.Google Scholar
The committee for Greenlandic mineral resources to the benefit of society. (2014). To the benefit of Greenland. Nuuk, Greenland/Copenhagen, Denmark: Ilisimatusarfik/University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Thisted, K. (2009). “Where once Dannebrog waved for more than 200 years”: Banal nationalism narrative templates and post-colonial melancholia. Review of Development & Change, 14(1 & 2), 147–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thisted, K. (2013). Discourses of indigeneity. Branding Greenland in the age of self-government and climate change. In Sörlin, S. (Ed.), Science, geopolitics and culture in the Polar region – Norden beyond borders (pp. 227–258). Farnham, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Thisted, K. (2014). Cosmopolitan inuit: New perspectives on Greenlandic film. In MacKenzie, S., & Stenport, A. W. (Eds.), Films on ice: Cinemas of the Arctic (pp. 97–104). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Thisted, K. (2017). “A Place in the sun”: Historical perspectives on the debate on development and modernity in Greenland. In Hansson, H., & Ryall, A. (Eds.), Arctic modernities: The environmental, the exotic and the everyday (pp. 312–344). Cambridge, England: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Thisted, K., & Gremaud, A-S. N. (2014). Danmark og det nye Nordatlanten [Denmark and the new North Atlantic]. Tidsskriftet Grønland, 62(2), 89–108.Google Scholar
Thisted, K., & Gremaud, A-S. N. (forthcoming). Envisioning the North Atlantic. In Thisted, K., & Gremaud, A-S. N. (Eds.), Denmark and the new North Atlantic. Narratives and memories in a former empire. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Thrift, N. J. (2007). Non-representational Theory. Space, Politics, Affect. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
Visit Greenland (2012). Danskernes fordomme om Grønland og grønlændere. Visit Greenland og YouGovs undersøgelse udført i august 2012. Press release, link no longer available.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and Emotion. A New Social Science Understanding. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar