Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9knnw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-28T01:23:37.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Boris Eikhenbaum's Unfinished Work on Tolstoy: A Dialogue with Soviet History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Carol Any
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Russian formalist and Tolstoy scholar Boris Eikhenbaum is best known for his work in developing an intrinsic poetics. After his formalist period, however, Eikhenbaum turned, in his work on Tolstoy, to extrinsic approaches, initially privileging author and reader and later focusing on social context. This essay argues that Eikhenbaum's choice of particular extrinsic approaches was suggested, indirectly and unexpectedly, by Soviet political culture in the Stalin years. An examination of the relation between Eikhenbaum's literary theories and Soviet political reality is followed by an evaluation of Eikhenbaum's postformalist Tolstoy scholarship.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 105 , Issue 2 , March 1990 , pp. 233 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Bakhtin, Mikhail. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Ed. and trans. Emerson, Caryl. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1984.Google Scholar
Chudakova, M.O. “Sotsial'naia praktika i nauchnaia reflektsiia v tvorcheskoi biografii B. Eikhenbauma” [Social Practice and Scholarly Reflection in B. Eikhenbaum's Creative Biography]. Revue des études slaves 57 (1985): 27–43.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. “Glavy iz nezavershennoi monografii o L.N. Tolstom” [Chapters from the Uncompleted Monograph on L.N. Tolstoy]. Eikhenbaum, Lev Tolstoi: Semidesiatye gody, 1974. 195–336.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. “K voprosu ob istochnikakh Anny Kareninoi” [On the Question of Sources for Anna Karenina]. Uchenye zapiski Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Scholarly Papers of Leningrad State University] 76.11. Leningrad: LGU, 1941. 191–229.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. “K voprosu o zvukakh stikha” [On the Question of the Sounds of Verse]. Birzhevye vedomosti, utrennii vypusk [Stock Exchange News] 7 Oct. 1916, morning ed.: 5.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. “Legenda o zelenoi palochke” [The Legend of the Green Wand]. Eikhenbaum, O proze 431–38.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. Lev Tolstoi [Leo Tolstoy]. 2 vols. Leningrad, 1928–31. 2 vols, in 1. München: Fink, 1968.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. Lev Tolstoi: Semidesiatye gody [Leo Tolstoy: The Seventies]. Leningrad: Sovetskii Pisatel', 1960.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. Lev Tolstoi: Semidesiatye gody [Leo Tolstoy: The Seventies]. Leningrad: Khudozhestvennaia Literatura, 1974.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. “Lirika Lermontova” [Lermontov's Lyric Poetry]. Commentary. Sobranie stikhotvorenii v dvux tomakh [Collected Works in Two Volumes]. By M. lu. Lermontov. Vol. 1. Leningrad: Sovetskii Pisatel', 1940. 277–335. Rpt. in his Stat'i o Lermontove 289–359.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. “Literatura i literaturnyi byt” [Literature and Literary Milieu]. Na literaturnom postu [On Literary Guard] 9 (1927): 47–52. Rpt. as “Literaturnyi byt” [Literary Milieu]. In his Moi vremennik 49–58.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. “Literatura i pisatel'” [Literature and the Writer]. Zvezda [Star] 5 (1927): 121–40. Rpt. in his Moi vremennik 59–81.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. “Literaturnaia pozitsiia Lermontova” [Lermontov's Literary Position]. Literaturnoe nasledstvo [Literary Heritage] 43–44. Moskva: AN SSSR, 1941. 3–82. Rpt. in his Stat'i o Lermontove 40–124.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. Moi vremennik: Slovesnost', nauka, kritika, smes' [My Periodical: Literature, Scholarship, Criticism, Miscellany]. Leningrad, 1929. Ann Arbor: UMI, 1987.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. Molodoi Tolstoi [The Young Tolstoy]. Petrograd, 1922. München: Fink, 1968.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. “Nakanune” [On the Eve]. Literaturnaia gazeta [The Literary Gazette] 17 Nov. I960: 5.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. “Nasledie Belinskogo i Lev Tolstoi” [Belinsky's Legacy and Leo Tolstoy]. Eikhenbaum, O proze 125–66.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. “Obshchestvenno-politicheskie deklaratsii Lermontova (1838–1841)” [Lermontov's Sociopolitical Declarations (1838–1841)]. Uchenye zapiski Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Scholarly Papers of Leningrad State University] 87. Saratov: LGU, 1943. 152–72.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. “Ocherednye problemy izucheniia L. Tolstogo” [Priority Issues for Tolstoy Scholarship]. Trudy iubileinoi nauchnoi sessii Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeniA.A. Zhdanova. Sektsiia filologicheskikh nauk [Transactions of the Jubilee Scholarly Session of Leningrad State University Named for A.A. Zhdanov. Philology Sector]. Leningrad: LGU, 1946. 279–93.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. “O krizisakh Tolstogo” [On Tolstoy's Crises]. Skvoz' literaturu [Across Literature]. Leningrad, 1924. Würzburg: “Journalfranz” Arnulf Liebing, 1972. 67–72.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. O literature: Raboty raznykh let [On Literature: Works from Various Years]. Moskva: Sovetskii Pisatel', 1987.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. O proze [On Prose]. Leningrad: Khudozhestvennaia Literatura, 1969.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. “O vzgliadakh Lenina na istoricheskoe znachenie Tolstogo” [On Lenin's Views of Tolstoy's Historical Significance]. Eikhenbaum, O proze 61–76.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. “Rabota nad Tolstym: Iz dnevnikov 1926–1959 gg” [Work on Tolstoy: From the Diaries of 1926–1959]. Kontekst 1981: Literaturno-teoreticheskie issledovaniia [Context 1981: Literary and Theoretical Investigations]. Moskva: Nauka, 1982. 263–302.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. Stat'i o Lermontove [Articles on Lermontov]. Moskva: AN SSSR, 1961.Google Scholar
Eikhenbaum, Boris. “Tolstoi posle Voiny i mira” [Tolstoy after War and Peace]. Literaturnoe nasledstvo [Literary Heritage] 35–36. Moskva: AN SSSR, 1939. 221–64.Google Scholar
Kamenskii, la. “Lozhnye paralleli i porochnye vyvody” [False Parallels and Fallacious Conclusions]. Literaturnaia gazeta [The Literary Gazette] 21 June 1947: 2.Google Scholar
Kaverin, V. “Literator: Iz knigi vospominanii” [A Man of Letters: From a Book of Memoirs]. Znamia [Banner] 8 (1987): 80–121.Google Scholar
McLean, Hugh. “Two Decades of a Russian Giant.” New York Times Book Review 18 Apr. 1982: 14.Google Scholar
Mordovchenko, N. Letter. Kul'tura i zhizn' [Culture and Life] 21 Mar. 1947: 4.Google Scholar
Mustangova, E. “Formalisty na novom étape” [The Formalists in a New Stage]. Za marksistskoe literaturovedenie [For a Marxist Literary Scholarship]. Leningrad: Academia, 1930. 130–42.Google Scholar
Riurikov, B. “Ob otnoshenii k literaturnomu naslediiu proshlogo” [On the Attitude toward the Literary Heritage of the Past]. Bol'shevik [Bolshevik] 10 (1947): 55–62.Google Scholar
Riurikov, B. “Vrednaia kontseptsiia professora B. Eikhenbauma” [Professor B. Eikhenbaum's Harmful Concept]. Kul'tura i zhizn' [Culture and Life] 20 Oct. 1946: 4.Google Scholar
Schefski, Harold K. “The Changing Focus of Eikhenbaum's Tolstoi Criticism.” Russian Review 37 (1978): 298–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shklovskii, Viktor. Zhili-Byli [Once upon a Time]. Moskva: Sovetskii Pisatel', 1966.Google Scholar
Todd, William Mills M. “Literature as an Institution: Fragments of a Formalist Theory.” Russian Formalism: A Retrospective Glance. Ed. Jackson, Robert Louis and Rudy, Stephen. New Haven: Yale Center for Intl. and Area Studies, 1985. 15–26.Google Scholar
Trifonova, T. “Ob oshibkakh leningradskikh kritikov” [On the Mistakes of Leningrad Critics]. Leningradskaia pravda 8 Sept. 1946: 3.Google Scholar