We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
REFERENCES
Beckman, Mary E. & Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook3. 255–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabe, Esther (1998). Comparative intonational phonology: English and German. PhD dissertation, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin (2007). Pre-established categories don't exist: consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology11. 119–132.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert (1978). Stylized intonation. Lg54. 517–540.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert (1996). Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert (2008). Intonational phonology. 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. (2007). Linguistic typology requires crosslinguistic formal categories. Linguistic Typology11. 133–157.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar