Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-42vt5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-04T00:55:12.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constituent structure and government in phonology*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

Jonathan Kaye ,
Jean Lowenstamm  and
Jean-Roger Vergnaud
Jonathan Kaye
Affiliation:
SOAS, University of London
Jean Lowenstamm
Affiliation:
UQAM
Jean-Roger Vergnaud
Affiliation:
University of Southern California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Our aim in this paper is to address certain empirical and conceptual issues in the theory of Universal Phonology. Specifically, we will formulate a number of proposals aimed at characterising the notion ‘possible syllable' and ‘possible word'. The principles we will lay out follow from what we see as a unified theory of phonological government.

The introduction of the notion of multi-levelled representations, as well as the recognition of constituent structure organisation in phonology, has allowed for a shift from mainly segment-internal, paradigmatic considerations to the study of syntagmatic relations holding between phonological units. What is now required is nothing less than a syntax of phonological expressions.

Information

Type
Phonological government
Information
Phonology , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , May 1990 , pp. 193 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Aoki, H. (1970). Nez Perce grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Aoun, J. (1979). Is the syllable or the supersyllable a constituent? MIT Working Papers in Linguistics I. 140–148.Google Scholar
Charette, M. (1987). The Minimality Condition in phonology. Ms, McGill University and UQAM.Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. (1986). Length, syllabification and the phonological cycle in Italian. Journal of Italian Linguistics 8. 5–34,Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & H., Lasnik (1977). Filters and control. LI 8. 425–504.Google Scholar
El, Mejjad K. (1985). Le parler de Marrakech: quelques aspects prosodiques. Thèse de doctorat de 3ème cycle, Université de Paris VII.Google Scholar
Guerssel, M. (1978). A condition on assimilation rules. Linguistic Analysis 4. 225–254.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & K., Stevens (1977). A note on laryngeal features. MIT Quarterly Progress Reports 101. 198–213.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1986). Inalterability in CV phonology. Lg 62. 321–352.Google Scholar
Jungraithmayr, H. (1956). Untersuchungen zur Sprache der Tangale in NordostNigerien. PhD dissertation, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
Jungraithmayr, H. (1971). The Tangale vowel harmony reconsidered. Journal African Languages 10. 28–33.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. D. (1985). On the syllable structure of certain West African languages. In Goyvaerts, D. (ed.) African linguistics: essays in memory of M. W. K. Semikenke. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, J. D. (1990). Government in phonology: the case of Moroccan Arabic. The Linguistic Review 6. 131–159.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. D. & J., Lowenstamm (1984). De la syllabicité. In Dell, F., Hirst, D. & Vergnaud, J -R. (eds.) Forme sonore du langage. Paris: Hermann. 123–159.Google Scholar
Kaye, J. D., J., Lowenstamm & J.-R., Vergnaud (1985). The internal structure of phonological representations: a theory of charm and government. Phonology Yearbook 2. 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, J. D., J., Lowenstamm & J.-R., Vergnaud (1989). Rektion und Konstituentrektion in der Phonologie. Linguistische Berichte 114. 31–75.Google Scholar
Kidda, M. (1985). Tangale phonology: a descriptive analysis. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Koopman, H. (1984). The syntax of verbs. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Lee, Jung Won (1987). Des aspects de la phonologie coréenne. Mémoire de maîtrise, Université de Paris VII.Google Scholar
Leslau, W. (1941). Documents Tigrigna. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, J. (1988). Ngizim vowels. Ms, UQAM.Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, J. (in preparation). Tigrinya infinitives. Ms, UQAM.Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, J. & J., Kaye (1985). Compensatory lengthening in Tiberian Hebrew. In Wetzels, L. & Sezer, E. (eds.) Studies in compensatory lengthening. Dordrecht: Foris. 97–132.Google Scholar
Morin, Y. C. (1987). On explaining cross-syllabic constraints. In Dressler, W. U., Luschützky, H., Pfeiffer, O. & Rennison, J. R. (eds.) Phonologica 1984. cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 207–213.Google Scholar
Nespor, M. & I., Vogel (1979). Clash avoidance in Italian. LI 10. 467–482.Google Scholar
Nikiema, E. (1986). Implications théoriques de l'épenthèse vocalique en moore. Ms, UQAM.Google Scholar
Nikiema, E. (1989). Gouvernement propre et licenciement en phonologie: le cas du tangale. Langues Orientales Anciennes, Philologie et Linguistique 2. 225–251.Google Scholar
Riemsdijk, H. van & E., Williams (1986). Introduction to the theory of grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schein, B. & D., Steriade (1986). On geminates. LI. 17 691–744.Google Scholar
Schuh, R. (1971). Verb forms and verb aspects in Ngizim. Journal of African Languages 10. 47–60.Google Scholar
Schuh, R. (1972). Aspects of Ngizim syntax. PhD dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
Schuh, R. (1978). Bade/Ngizim vowels and syllable structure. Studies in African Linguistics 9. 247–283.Google Scholar
Schuh, R. (1981). A dictionary of Ngizim. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schuh, R. (ms). Ngizimicae linguae principia. UCLA.Google Scholar
Vergnaud, J.-R. (1982). On the theoretical bases of phonology. Paper presented at the 1982 GLOW colloquium, Paris.Google Scholar
Voigt, R. M. (1977). Das tigrinische Verbalsystem. Berlin: Dietrich Riemer.Google Scholar