Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-sbgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-19T19:42:13.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Coda’ licensing*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2008

Jonathan Kaye
Jonathan Kaye
Affiliation:
SOAS, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the main thrusts of the research programme known as Government Phonology has been the attempt to replace the rule component of a phonology by a group of universal principles common to all linguistic systems along with a series of parameters which delimit the nature of linguistic variation from one system to another. Given the wealth of analyses that employ rules and the fact that their number continues to grow, even to this day, it is a daunting task to find plausible alternative stories for each and every analysis that employs phonological rules in some crucial way. One of the leading ideas of work done on syllable structure that I have participated in for the last ten years has been the emergence of such alternative analyses for a series of phenomena that seemed to call for phonological rules.

Type
Phonological government
Information
Phonology , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , May 1990 , pp. 301 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bromberger, Sylvain & Morris, Halle (1989). Why phonology is different. LI 20. 51–70.Google Scholar
Charette, , Monik, (1984). The appendix in parametric phonology. Studies in African Linguistics. Supplement 9. 49–53.Google Scholar
Charette, Monik (1988). Some constraints on governing relations in phonology. PhD dissertation, McGill University.Google Scholar
Halle, , Morris, & Clements, G. N. (1983). Problem book in phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Jean-Roger, Vergnaud (1978). Metrical structures in phonology. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1980). A metrical theory of stress rules. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan (1985). On the syllable structure of certain West African languages. In Goyvaerts, D. (ed.) African linguistics: essays in memory of M. W. K. Semikenke. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, , Jonathan, (1990). Government in phonology: the case of Moroccan Arabic. The Linguistic Review 6. 131–159.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan (forthcoming). On the interaction of theories of lexical phonology and theories of phonological phenomena. In Dressler, W. U., Luschützky, H. C., Pfeiffer, O. E. & Rennison, J. R. (eds.) Phonologica 1988. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan & Jean, Lowenstamm (1981). Syllable structure and markedness theory. In Belletti, A., Brandi, L. & Rizzi, L. (eds.) Theory of markedness in Generative Grammar. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore. 287–316.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan & Jean, Lowenstamm (1984). De la syllabicité. In Deli, F., Hirst, D. & Vergnaud, J.-R. (eds.) Forme sonore du langage. Paris: Hermann. 123–160.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Jean, Lowenstamm & Jean-Roger, Vergnaud (1985). The internal structure of phonological elements: a theory of charm and government. Phonology Yearbook 2. 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Jean, Lowenstamm & Jean-Roger, Vergnaud (1989). Rektion und Konstituentrektion in der Phonologie. Linguistische Berichte 114. 31–75.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan & Jean-Roger, Vergnaud (1989). Towards a theory of lexical access and lexical representation. Ms, London & Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean (1988). On the non-adjacency of geminate consonants. Paper presented at the Generative Phonology Workshop ‘How different is phonology?’, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean & Jonathan, Kaye (1985). Compensatory lengthening in Tiberian Hebrew. In Wetzels, L. & Sezer, E. (eds.) Studies in compensatory lengthening. Dordrecht: Foris. 97–132.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John (1979). Formal problems in Semitic phonology and morphology. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Segundo, Sylvia (1989). Stress and related phenomena in Brazilian (Natal) Portuguese. PhD. dissertation, SOAS, University of London.Google Scholar
Underhill, Robert (1976). Turkish grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Yoshida, Shohei (1990). Some aspects of governing relations in Japanese phonology. PhD dissertation, SOAS, University London.Google Scholar