We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Christoph Gabriel , Randall Gessand Trudel Meisenburg(eds.) (2021). Manual of Romance phonetics and phonology. (Manuals of Romance Linguistics 27). Berlin: De Gruyter. Pp. xiv + 975.
Review products
Christoph Gabriel , Randall Gessand Trudel Meisenburg(eds.) (2021). Manual of Romance phonetics and phonology. (Manuals of Romance Linguistics 27). Berlin: De Gruyter. Pp. xiv + 975.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
30 May 2023
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Best, Catherine T. (1995). A direct realist perspective on cross-language speech perception. In Strange, Winifred (ed.) Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research. Timonium, MD: York Press, 167–200.Google Scholar
Best, Catherine T. & Tyler, Michael D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn, Ocke-Schwen & Munro, Murray J. (eds.) Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea (2005). Markedness and economy in a derivational model of phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (2008). On phases. In Freidin, Robert, Otero, Carlos P. & Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa (eds.) Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 133–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, James Emil (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, Winifred (ed.) Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research. Timonium, MD: York Press, 233–277.Google Scholar
Grosjean, François (2010). Bilingual: Life and reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman (1941). Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Språkvetenskapliga Sällskapets i Uppsala Förhandlingar. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitetet.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, Peter W., Houston, Derek M. & Newsome, Mary (1999). The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology39:3–4. 159–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez-Paricio, Violeta (2013). An exploration of minimal and maximal metrical feet. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Mattys, Sven L. & Jusczyk, Peter W. (2001). Do infants segment words or recurring contiguous patterns?Journal of Experimental Psychology27:3. 644–655.Google ScholarPubMed
Piaget, Jean (1971). The theory of stages in cognitive development. In Green, Donald Ross, Ford, Marguerite P. & Flamer, George B. (eds.) Measurement and Piaget. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1–11.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Technical Report 2, Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel (2011). Velar and dental stop consonant softening in Romance. Diachronica28:2. 186–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy (2003). Polish palatalization in Derivational Optimality Theory. Lingua113:3. 197–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffran, Jenny R., Aslin, Richard N. & Newport, Elissa L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science274:5294. 1926–1928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saffran, Jenny R., Senghas, Ann & Trueswell, John C. (2001). The acquisition of language by children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America98:23. 12874–12875.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiessen, Erik D. & Saffran, Jenny R. (2007). Learning to learn: Infants’ acquisition of stress-based strategies for word segmentation. Language Learning and Development3:1. 73–100.Google Scholar