Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-9xpg2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-11T20:43:00.402Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aspiration and laryngeal representation in Germanic*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2009

Gregory K. Iverson  and
Joseph C. Salmons
Gregory K. Iverson
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
Joseph C. Salmons
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The phonetic gesture of stop consonant aspiration, which is predictable in a Germanic language such as English, has been described traditionally as ranging from a ‘puff of air’ upon release of closure (Heffner 1950) to the segmental occurrence of a following voiceless glottal approximant /h/ (Trager & Smith 1951). Within the generative phonology paradigm, however, aspiration has been construed as a featural property rather than as an independent segment of its own, often casually identified simply as [+aspiration], or, following Chomsky & Halle (1968), as a positive specification resulting from ‘heightened subglottal pressure’. We take this kind of view here as well, employing a notation with superscript h ([Ch]) to indicate representations in which aspiration is encoded as an integral feature of the segment with which it is associated, while we explore the phonological realisation of aspiration in Germanic as the reflex manifestation of a spread or open glottis, an idea first advanced in the seminal work of Kim (1970), and since developed in Anderson & Ewen's treatment of ‘|O| languages’ (1987: 195–199)

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , December 1995 , pp. 369 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abramson, Arthur S. & Erickson, Donna M. (1992). Tone splits and voicing shifts in Thai: phonetic plausibility. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research, SR-109/110. 255–262.Google Scholar
Anderson, John M. & Ewen, Colin J. (1987). Principles of dependency phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, R. J. H. van den (1988). The perception of voicing in Dutch two-obstruent sequences: a comparison of synthetic and natural speech. JPh 16. 171–180.Google Scholar
Geert, Booij & Rubach, Jerzy (1987). Postcyclic versus postlexical rules in Lexical Phonology. LI 18. 1–44.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Louis, Goldstein (1986a). Toward an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3. 219–252.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Louis, Goldstein (1986b). Representation of voicing contrasts using articulatory gestures. JPh 14. 339–342.Google Scholar
Karl, Brugmann & Berthold, Delbriick (1930). Grundrifβ der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Vol. 1: Einleitung und Lautlehre. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. [Originally published 1886.]Google Scholar
ChoYoung-mee, Yu (1990). Parameters of consonantal assimilation. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
ChoYoung-mee, Yu (1991). Voiceless sonorants are aspirates. Paper presented at the 65th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Chicago.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam Halle (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. (1985). The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2. 225–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collinge, N. E. (1985). The laws of Indo-European. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Andre M. (1994). Aspiration in English: how should it be denned and where should it be described? Ms, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Davis, Katharine (1994). Stop voicing in Hindi. JPh 22. 177–193.Google Scholar
DeSchutter, Georges (1994). Dutch. In Konig & van der Auwera (1994). 439–477.Google Scholar
Fourakis, Marios & Iverson, Gregory K. (1985). On the acquisition of second language timing patterns. Language Learning 35. 431–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandour, Jack & Maddieson, Ian (1976). Measuring larynx movement in Standard Thai using the cricothyrometer. Phonetica 33. 241–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrett, Andrew & Mark, Hale (1993). The phonetics and phonology of Grimm's and Verner's Laws. Paper presented at the 67th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John (1990). Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Louis (1990). On articulatory binding: comments on Kingston's paper. In Kingston & Beckman (1990). 445–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grammont, Maurice (1933). Traite dephonétique. Paris: Delagrave.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris Stevens (1971). A note on laryngeal features. MIT Quarterly Progress Report 101. 198–213.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Jean-Roger, Vergnaud (1987). An essay on stress. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1981). A metrical theory of stress rules. PhD dissertation, MIT. Published 1985, New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Heffner, R.-M. S. (1950). General phonetics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Henton, Caroline, Peter, Ladefoged & Ian, Maddieson (1992). Stops in the world's languages. Phonetica 49. 65–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoard, James E. (1971). Aspiration, tenseness, and syllabication in English. Lg 47. 133–140.Google Scholar
Hutters, Birgit (1985). Vocal fold adjustments in aspirated and unaspirated stops in Danish. Phonetica 42. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
I to, Junko, & Mester, R. Armin (1986). The phonology of voicing in Japanese: theoretical consequences of morphologial accessibility. LI 17. 49–73.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K. (1983a). On glottal width features. Lingua 60. 331–339.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K. (1983b). Korean s.JPh 11. 191–200.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K. (1989). On the category Supralaryngeal. Phonology 6. 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K. & Salmons, Joseph C. (1992). The phonology of the Proto-Indo-European root structure constraints. Lingua 87. 293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, John T. (1993). English phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JunSun-Ah, (1994). The status of the lenis stop voicing rule in Korean. In Young- Key Kim-Renaud (ed.) Theoretical issues in Korean linguistics. Stanford: CSLI. 101–114.Google Scholar
Kagaya, R. (1974). A fiberscopic and acoustic study of the Korean stops, affricates and fricatives. JPh 2. 161–180.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. (1984). Phonetic and phonological representation of stop voicing. Lg 60. 286–319.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia A., Mikos, Michael J. & Ganong III, William F. (1981). A crosslanguage study of range of voice onset time in the perception of initial stop voicing. JASA 70. 1261–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, R. E. (1978). The German language. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: The Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael (1994). Phonology in generative grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kim, Chin-Wu (1970). A theory of aspiration. Phonetica 21. 107–116. Reprinted 1988 in Sojourns in language I (Collectedpapers by Chin-Wu Kim). Seoul: Tower Press. 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, John (1990). Articulatory binding. In Kingston & Beckman (1990). 406–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, John & Beckman, Mary (eds.) (1990). Papers in laboratory phonology I: between the grammar and physics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, John & Diehl, Randy L. (1994). Phonetic knowledge. Lg 70. 419–454.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1979). Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. LI 10. 421–441.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1982). Lexical morphology and phonology. In I.-S. Yang (ed.) Linguistics in the morning calm. Seoul: Hanshin. 3–91.Google Scholar
Kloeke, W. U. S. van Lessen (1982). Deutsche Phonologie and Morphologie. Tubingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, Klaus (1984). Phonetic explanation in phonology: the feature fortis/lenis. Phonetica 41. 150–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konig, Ekkehard & Johan van der Auwera (eds.) (1994). The Germanic languages. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter (1973). The features of the larynx. JPh 1. 73–83.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter (1993). A course in phonetics. 3rd edn.Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P. (1986). A Gothic etymological dictionary. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisker, Leigh & Abramson, Arthur (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word 20. 384–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lofqvist, Anders & Yoshioka, H. (1981). Interarticulator programming in obstruent production. Phonetica 38. 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardi, Linda (1991). Laryngeal features and laryngeal neutralization. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Published 1994, New York:Garland.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Linda (1991). Laryngeal features and laryngeal neutralization. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Published 1994, New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Linda (1995). Laryngeal neutralization and syllable wellformedness. NLLT 13. 39–74.Google Scholar
Lotzmann, Geert (1975). Zur Aspiration der Explosivae im Deutschen: ein sprechwissenschaftlich- phonetischer Beitrag zur Deutschen Hochlautung. Goppingen: Verlag Alfred Kiimmerle.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John (1986). OCP effects: gemination and antigemination. LI 17. 207–263.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mester, , Armin, R. & Junko, I to (1989). Feature predictability and underspecification: palatal prosody in Japanese mimetics. Lg 65. 258–293Google Scholar
Meyer, Richard M. (1894). Eine urgermanische Inlautregel. Anzeiger fiir Dentsches Altertum und Literatur 38. 53–54Google Scholar
Munhall, K. & Lofqvist, A. (1992). Gestural aggregation in speech: laryngeal gestures. JPh 20. 111–126Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: ForisGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J. (1990). The generality of articulatory binding: comments on Kingston's paper. In Kingston & Beckman (1990). 435–444.Google Scholar
Ohala, Manjari (1983). Aspects of Hindi phonology. Delhi: Motilal BanarsidassGoogle Scholar
Ohde, Ralph N. (1984). Fundamental frequency as an acoustic correlate of stop consonant voicing. JASA 75. 224–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prokosch, Eduard (1938). A comparative Germanic grammar. Baltimore: Linguistic Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
Ramers, Karl-Heinz & Heinz, Vater (1991). Einführung in die Phonologic Cologne: Gabel VerlagGoogle Scholar
Repp, Bruno H. (1984). Effects of temporal stimulus properties on perception of the [sl]-[spl] distinction. Phonetica 41. 117–124CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rischel, Jorgen (1985). An appraisal of research in the phonetics and phonology of Thai. Annual Report of the Institute of Phonetics, University of Copenhagen 19. 43–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schindler, Jochem (1976). Diachronic and synthronic remarks on Bartholomae's and Grassmann's Laws. LI 7. 622–637.Google Scholar
Schrodt, Richard (1976). Die germanische Lautverschiebung und ihre Stellung im Kreise der indogermanischen Sprachen. 2nd edn. Vienna: Karl M. HalosarGoogle Scholar
Slis, I. H. (1986). Assimilation of voice in Dutch as a function of stress, word boundaries and sex of speaker and listener. JPh 14. 311–326.Google Scholar
Streitberg, Wilhelm (1963). Urgermanische Grammatik: Einfiihrung in das vergleichende Studium der altgermanischen Dialekte. 3rd edn.Heidelberg: Carl Winter. [Originally published 1896]Google Scholar
Szemerenyi, Oswalt (1989). Einfiihrung in die vergleichende Sprachwissenschaft. 3rd edn. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche BuchgesellschaftGoogle Scholar
Thrainsson, Hoskuldur (1978). On the phonology of Icelandic aspiration. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 1. 3–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrainsson, Hoskuldur (1994). Icelandic. In Konig & van der Auwera (1994). 142–189.Google Scholar
Trager, George & Smith, Henry L. (1951). An outline of English structure. Norman: Battenburg PressGoogle Scholar
Treiman, , Rebecca, Jennifer Gross & Cwikiel Glavin, Annemarie (1992). The syllabification of /s/ clusters in English. JPh 20. 383–402.Google Scholar
Van, Coetsem, Frans, Ronald Hendricks & McCormick, Susan (1981). Accent typology and sound change. Lingua 53. 295–315Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo (1988). Preference laws for syllable structure and the explanation of sound change. Berlin: Mouton de GruyterGoogle Scholar
Vennemann, Theo (1993). Language change as language improvement. In Charles Jones (ed.) Historical linguistics: problems and perspectives. London: Longman. 319–344Google Scholar
Weismer, Gary (1980). Control of the voicing distinction for intervocalic stops and fricatives: some data and theoretical considerations. JPh 8. 427–438Google Scholar
Yoshioka, H., Lofqvist, A. & Hirose, H. (1981). Laryngeal adjustments in the production of consonant clusters and geminates in American English. JASA 70. 1615–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar