Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-glrdx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T08:37:16.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Blackmail Should be Banned

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2009

Hugh Evans
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy , Volume 65 , Issue 251 , January 1990 , pp. 89 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Owens, David, ‘Should Blackmail be Banned?’, Philosophy 63, No. 246 (1988), 501–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Smith v Bromley (1781) 2 Doug 696, 697Google Scholar; Goff, Lord and Jones, G., The Law of Restitution, 3rd edn (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1986), 407–410.Google Scholar

3 Mill, J. S., On Liberty, Ch 3.Google Scholar

4 I would like to thank David Owens and Jalil Asif for their helpful comments.