Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-c75p9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-18T12:08:45.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mathematics and Reality: Two Notions of Spacetime in the Analytic and Constructionist Views of Gauge Field Theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Sunny Y. Auyang
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents two interpretations of the fiber bundle fonnalism that is applicable to all gauge field theories. The constructionist interpretation yields a substantival spacetime. The analytic interpretation yields a structural spacetime, a third option besides the familiar substantivalism and relationalism. That the same mathematical fonnalism can be derived in two different ways leading to two different ontological interpretations reveals the inadequacy of pure fonnal arguments.

Information

Type
Philosophy of Physics and Chemistry
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 67 , Issue S3: Supplement. Proceedings of the 1998 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part II: Symposia Papers Sep., 2000 , 2000 , pp. S482 - S494
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

‡

I thank Paul Teller for helpful discussions and John Stachel and Andrew Wayne for critical readings of the first draft.

References

Auyang, Sunny (1995), How Is Quantum Field Theory Possible? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Auyang, Sunny. (1998), Foundations of Complex System Theories in Economics, Evolutionary Biology, and Statistical Physics. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511626135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earman, John (1989), World Enough and Spacetime. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Field, Harty (1980), Science Without Number. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul (1976), “Is There a Problem about Substitutional Quantification?”, in Evans, E. and McDowell, J. (eds.), Truth and Meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac (1962), “On the Gravity and Equilibrium of Fluids”, in Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton, selected and translated by Hall, A. R. and Hall, M. B. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stachel, John (1986), “What a Physicist Can Learn from the Discovery of General Relativity”, in Ruffini, R. (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity. Uppsala: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1857–1862.Google Scholar