Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-k7rjm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-24T22:50:58.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mathematical Rigor in Physics: Putting Exact Results in Their Place

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Axel Gelfert
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present paper examines the role of exact results in the theory of many-body physics, and specifically the example of the Mermin-Wagner theorem, a rigorous result concerning the absence of phase transitions in low-dimensional systems. While the theorem has been shown to hold for a wide range of many-body models, it is frequently ‘violated’ by results derived from the same models using numerical techniques. This raises the question of how scientists regulate their theoretical commitments in such cases, given that the models, too, are often described as approximations to the underlying ‘full’ many-body problem.

Information

Type
Topics in Philosophy of Physics
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 72 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2004 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers , December 2005 , pp. 723 - 738
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bogoliubov, Nikolai N. (1960), “On Some Problems of the Theory of Superconductivity”, Physica (Supplement) 62:S1–S16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogoliubov, Nikolai N. (1962), Physikalische Abhandlungen der Sowjetunion 6: 1, 113, 229.Google Scholar
Brown, Bryson (1990), “How to Be Realistic about Inconsistency in Science”, How to Be Realistic about Inconsistency in Science 21:281–294.Google Scholar
Da Costa, Newton C. A., and French, Steven (1993), “Towards an Acceptable Theory of Acceptance: Partial Structures, Inconsistency and Correspondence”, in French, Steven and Kamminga, Harmke (eds.), Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics: Essays in Honour of Heinz Post. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, Kevin (2003), “Is Mathematical Rigor Necessary in Physics?”, Is Mathematical Rigor Necessary in Physics? 54:439–463.Google Scholar
Gelfert, Axel, and Nolting, Wolfgang (2001), “The Absence of Finite-Temperature Phase Transitions in Low-Dimensional Many-Body Models: A Survey and New Results”, The Absence of Finite-Temperature Phase Transitions in Low-Dimensional Many-Body Models: A Survey and New Results 13:R505–R524.Google Scholar
Gelfert, Axel, and Nolting, Wolfgang (2000), “Absence of a Magnetic Phase Transition in Heisenberg, Hubbard, and Kondo-Lattice (s-f) Films”, Absence of a Magnetic Phase Transition in Heisenberg, Hubbard, and Kondo-Lattice (s-f) Films 217:805–818.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Robert B. (1972), “Rigorous Results and Theorems”, in Domb, C. and Green, M. E. (eds.), Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena. New York: Academic Press, 8–109.Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner (1928), “Zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus”, Zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus 49:619–636.Google Scholar
Keiter, H., and Kilić, S. (1998), “Unusual Perturbation Methods for Strongly Correlated Electron Systems”, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 177–181:323–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Chuang (1999), “Explaining the Emergence of Cooperative Phenomena”, Explaining the Emergence of Cooperative Phenomena 66 (Proceedings): S92–S106.Google Scholar
Mermin, N. D., and Wagner, H. (1966), “Absence of Ferromagnetism or Antiferromagnetism in One- or Two-Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Models”, Absence of Ferromagnetism or Antiferromagnetism in One- or Two-Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Models 17:1133–1136.Google Scholar
Smith, Joel M. (1988), “Inconsistency and Scientific Reasoning”, Inconsistency and Scientific Reasoning 19:429–445.Google Scholar
Sukiennicki, A., and Wojtczak, L. (1972), “Problem of Existence of Magnetic Order for the Hubbard Model of Thin Films”, Problem of Existence of Magnetic Order for the Hubbard Model of Thin Films 41:37–38.Google Scholar
Walker, M. B., and Ruijgrok, T. W. (1968), “Absence of Magnetic Ordering in One and Two Dimensions in a Many-Body Model for Interacting Electrons in a Metal”, Absence of Magnetic Ordering in One and Two Dimensions in a Many-Body Model for Interacting Electrons in a Metal 171:513–515.Google Scholar
Wilson, Mark (2000), “The Unreasonable Uncooperativeness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences”, The Unreasonable Uncooperativeness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences 83:296–314.Google Scholar