Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-7jgsp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T21:39:48.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion: Healey on the Aharonov-Bohm Effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Tim Maudlin
Tim Maudlin*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Richard Healey (1997) argues that the Aharonov-Bohm effect demands the recognition of either nonlocal or nonseparable physics in much the way that violations of Bell's inequality do. A careful examination of the effect and the arguments, though, shows that Healey's interpretation of the Aharonov-Bohm effect depends critically on his interpretation of gauge theories, and that the analogy with violations of Bell's inequalities fails.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , June 1998 , pp. 361 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © Philosophy of Science Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

Send requests for reprints to the author, Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University, Davison Hall, 26 Nichol Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901–2882.

‡

The author would like to thank an anonymous referee for very helpful comments.

References

Bell, John (1987), Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Earman, John and Norton, John (1987), “What Price Spacetime Substantivalism? The Hole Story”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38: 515–525.10.1093/bjps/38.4.515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healey, Richard (1997), “Nonlocality and the Aharonov-Bohm Effect”, Philosophy of Science 64: 18–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maudlin, Tim (1994), Quantum Nonlocality and Relativity. Oxford: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar