Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-pvkqz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-27T20:50:55.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Critique of Localized Realism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Mohamed Elsamahi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In an attempt to avert Laudan's pessimistic induction, Kitcher, Worrall and Psillos introduce a narrower version of scientific realism. According to this version, which can be referred to as “localized realism,” realists need not accept every component in a successful theory. They are supposed only to accept those components that led to the theory's empirical success. Consequently, realists can avoid believing in dubious entities like the caloric and ether. This paper examines and critiques localized realism. It also scrutinizes Psillos's historical study of the caloric theory of heat, which is intended to support localized realism.

Information

Type
Structural Realism
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 72 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2004 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers , December 2005 , pp. 1350 - 1360
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allen, James (1958), The Neutrino. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Hasok (2003), “Preservative Realism and Its Discontents: Revisiting Caloric”, Preservative Realism and Its Discontents: Revisiting Caloric 70:902–912.Google Scholar
Fox, Robert (1971), The Caloric Theory of Gases from Lavoisier to Regnault. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Franklin, Allan (2000), Are There Really Neutrinos? An Evidential History. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip (1993), The Advancement of Science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry (1981), “A Confutation of Convergent Realism”, A Confutation of Convergent Realism 48:19–49.Google Scholar
Ling, Gilbert (1984), In Search of the Physical Basis of Life. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Psillos, Stathis (1996), “Scientific Realism and the ‘Pessimistic Induction’”, Scientific Realism and the ‘Pessimistic Induction’ 63 (Supplement): S306–S314.Google Scholar
Psillos, Stathis (1999), Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stanford, P. Kyle (2003), “No Refuge for Realism: Selective Confirmation and the History of Science”, No Refuge for Realism: Selective Confirmation and the History of Science 70:913–925.Google Scholar
Truesdell, C. A. (1980), The Tragicomical History of Thermodynamics, 1822–1854. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worrall, John (1994), “How to Remain (Reasonably) Optimistic: Scientific Realism and the ‘Luminiferous Ether’”, in Hull, D., Forbes, M., and Burian, R. (eds.), PSA 1982: Proceedings of the 1982 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 1. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar