Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wlg5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T19:22:28.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Science As Representation: A Reply to Mr. MacKinnon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Rom Harré
Rom Harré*
Affiliation:
Linacre College, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Discussion
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , March 1977 , pp. 146 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bannister, D. and Mair, J. M. M. The Evaluation of Personal Constructs. London, New York: Academic Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Bhaskar, R. A Realist Theory of Science. Leeds: Books, 1975.Google Scholar
Bunge, M. Method, Model and Matter. Dordrecht, Boston: Reidel, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Waele, J. P. La Methode des Cas Programmes. Bruxelles: Dessart, 1971.Google Scholar
Faraday, M. Philosophical Magazine. 24 (1844): 136–144.Google Scholar
Harré, R. The Principles of Scientific Thinking. London: Macmillan, 1970 and 1972, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harré, R. and Secord, P. F. The Explanation of Social Behaviour. Oxford: Blackwell, 1972.Google Scholar
Harré, R. “Some Remarks on ‘Rule’ as a Scientific Concept.” In On Understanding Persons. Edited by Mischel, T. Oxford: Blackwell, 1973.Google Scholar
Harré, R. “Blueprint for a New Science.” In Reconstructing Social Psychology. Edited by Armistead, N. Harmondsworth, Middsex: Penguin, 1974.Google Scholar
Harré, R. and Madden, E. H. Causal Powers. Oxford: Blackwell, 1975.Google Scholar
Hooker, M. A. “Review of R. Harré's Principles of Scientific Thinking.” Dialogue 10 (1971): 825–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. The Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Translated by Ellington, J. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1970.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, E. “A Reinterpretation of Rom Harré's Copernican Revolution.” Philosophy of Science 42 (1975): 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madden, E. H. and Hare, P. H. “The Powers that Be.” Dialogue 10 (1971): 12–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madden, E. H. and Sachs, M. “Parmenidean Particulars and Vanishing Elements.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 3 (1972): 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priestley, J. The Theological Miscellaneous Works. London (1818): 191.Google Scholar
Scott, M. B. and Lyman, S. M. “Accounts.” American Sociological Review 33 (1968): 46–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shotter, J. “Acquired Powers: the Transformation of Natural into Personal Powers.” Journal of Theory of Social Behavior 3 (1973): 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar