Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-25T20:24:05.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revision of the genus Hyalomma

III. H. lusitanicum Koch and H. anatolicum K.*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

B. Feldman-Muhsam
B. Feldman-Muhsam
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The identity of Hyalomma lusitanicum K. and H. anatolicum K. is discussed. The male and female of the two species are described. H. anatolicum is considered as species inquirenda, but distinct from H. anatolicum anatolicum (sensu Pomeranzev) and H. anatolicum excavatum (sensu Pomeranzev). H. anatolicum anatolicum and H. anatolicum excavatum are considered to be one polymorphic species. This species should be called H. excavatum as it tallies with the still existing type specimen of H. excavatum Koch; it should not be called H. anatolicum as it does not correspond to Koch's description of H. anatolicum. The name H. anatolicum should for the present be reserved for a species resembling H. excavatum, but characterized by the light yellow colour of the anterior part of the scutum. It remains to be determined by breeding experiments whether this character is constant.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 52 , Issue 1-2 , May 1962 , pp. 211 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Delpy, L. (1949). Ann. Parasit. hum. comp. 24, 464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman-Muhsam, B. (1954). Bull. Res. Coun. Israel, 4, 150.Google Scholar
Feldman-Muhsam, B. & Kahn, J. (1958). J. Parasit. 44, (4), 23. Supplement.Google Scholar
Hoogstraal, H. (1956). African Ixodoidea. Depart. of the Navy. U.S.A.Google Scholar
Hoogstraal, H. & Kaiser, M. (1959). Ann. Ent. Soc. America, 52, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, C. L. (1844). Arch. Naturgesch. 10.Google Scholar
Koch, C. L. (1847). Uebersicht des Arachnidensystems. No. 4.Google Scholar
Kratz, W. (1940). Parasitenk. 11, 510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pervomaisky, G. S. (1954). Vsesoizn. Ent. Obshch. Trudy, 44, 62.Google Scholar
Pomeranzev, B. I. (1946). Tabl. anal. Faune U.R.S.S. No. 26.Google Scholar
Pomeranzev, B. I. (1950). Ixodidae. In Fauna of the USSR, 4.Google Scholar
Savigny, J. (1826). Description de l'Egypte. Planches de Zoologie. PI. 9.Google Scholar
Schulze, P. & Schlottke, E. (1929). S.B. naturf. Ges. Rostock, 2, 32.Google Scholar
Senevet, G. (1922). Arch. Inst. Pasteur Afr. N. 2, 393.Google Scholar
Senevet, G. (1928). Arch. Inst. Pasteur Algér. 6, 35.Google Scholar
Tendeiro, J. (1955). Bol. cult. Guiné portug. 10 (39), 319.Google Scholar
Tonelli-Rondelli, M. (1935). Atti. Soc. ital. Sci. nat. 74, 239.Google Scholar