Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-65tv2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-31T08:08:38.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Comparison of the Efficiency of Anthelmintics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

W. A. Carr Fraser
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The assumptions underlying the current methods of determining the efficiency of drugs or a mixture of drugs as an anthelmintic are set out.

2. The method of assessing the efficiency of a given drug or mixture of drugs, as used by Seddon and Ross, is cited and objections to its value are given.

3. A method is suggested whereby the mean efficiency of a drug or mixture of drugs can be assessed, in terms of the initial and residual infestation of selected animals.

4. In the light of the suggested method, Roberts' data for the efficiency of various drugs and mixtures of drugs, as specifics against H. contortus infestation in sheep, are fully investigated.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , October 1935 , pp. 465 - 475
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Fisher, R. A. (1930). Statistical Method for Research Workers, 3rd ed., pp. 324et seq. London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Le Roux, P. L. (1932). Vet. J. 88 205–7.Google Scholar
Roberts, F. B. S. (1932). Pamphlet No. 5, Dep. of Agric. and Stock, Queensland, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Seddon, H. R. and Ross, I. Clunies (1928). Vet. Res. Rep. N.S.W. No. 5, pp. 62–85.Google Scholar