Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-tfzs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-01T16:56:30.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the virus of turnip yellow mosaic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Roy Markham  and
Kenneth M. Smith
Roy Markham
Affiliation:
Plant Virus Research Unit, Molteno Institute, University of Cambridge
Kenneth M. Smith
Affiliation:
Plant Virus Research Unit, Molteno Institute, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A new virus affecting cruciferous plants is described and the name suggested for it is the turnip yellow mosaic virus. The virus is sap-transmissible and has a dilution end-point in extracted sap of 10−5. The thermal inactivation point lies between 70 and 75° C.

The virus is not transmitted by insects with sucking mouthparts, but the insect vector in nature is a flea-beetle, Phyllotreta sp. More than one species of flea-beetle can transmit the virus.

Under experimental conditions the virus has been transmitted by the mustard beetle, Phaedon cochleariae and its larva; by the ‘long-horn’ grasshopper, Leptophyes punctatissima Bosc.; by the ‘short-horn’ grasshopper, Stauroderus bicolor Charp. and by the common earwig, Forflcula auricularia Linn. Lepidopterous larvae have, so far, failed to transmit the virus.

The relationship of the virus with biting insects is discussed.

Turnip yellow mosaic virus has been obtained from several cruciferous plants as a nucleoprotein of the pentose type. It crystallizes from salt solutions as isotropic octahedra and from 20% alcohol at pH 3·7 as birefringent needles. On centrifuging out of solution the pellets are also crystalline. The virus preparation contains some 22% of nucleic acid.

The virus is denatured at room temperature in alcohol of concentration greater than 30% in neutral solutions, and the nucleic acid, which is a large polymerized particle, is liberated.

The preparations have been found to consist of 80 % of a nucleoprotein and 20 % of a nucleic acid-free protein which may be isolated by high-speed centrifuging. The latter has the same electrophoretic mobility and isoelectric point (pH 3·7) as the nucleoprotein; both crystallize in the same crystal form, and they are serologically identical.

The nucleic acid-free material does not seem to be infectious.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 39 , Issue 3-4 , February 1949 , pp. 330 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Bawden, F. C. & Pirie, N. W. (1938). Brit. J. Exp. Path. 19, 66.Google Scholar
Bordas, L. (1898). Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. 5.Google Scholar
Carter, W. (1928). Phytopathology, 18, 675.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. S. (1942). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y. 51, 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S. S. & Stanley, W. M. (1942). J. Biol. Chem. 144, 589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosslett, V. E. & Markham, R. (1948). Nature, Lond., 161, 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doolittle, S. P. (1920). Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. 879.Google Scholar
Goss, R. W. (1931). Res. Bull. Neb. Agric. Exp. Sta. 53.Google Scholar
Larson, R. H. & Walker, J. C. (1939). J. Agric. Res. 59, 367.Google Scholar
Markham, Roy & Smith, Kenneth M. (1946). Nature, Lond., 157, 300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, R. E. F. (1948). Nature, Lond., 161, 611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mejbaum, W. (1939). Hoppe-Seyl. Z. 258, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Militzer, W. E. (1946). Arch. Biochem. 9, 85.Google Scholar
Smith, Kenneth M. (1935). Ann. Appl. Biol. 22, 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Kenneth M. (1937). A Text-book of Plant Virus Diseases. J. and A. Churchill, Ltd.Google Scholar
Smith, Kenneth M. (1941). Parasitology, 33, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Kenneth M. & Markham, Roy (1946). Nature, Lond., 158, 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, W. M. (1939). J. Biol. Chem. 129, 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillmans, T. & Phillipi, K. (1929). Biochem. Z. 215, 36.Google Scholar
Tiselius, A., Pedersen, K. O. & Svedberg, T. (1937). Nature, Lond., 140, 848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar