Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-dk7s8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T17:54:52.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of positive and negative interspecific associations in the organization of communities of intestinal helminths of bats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. M. Lotz  and
W. F. Font
J. M. Lotz
Affiliation:
Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, P.O.Box 7000, 703 E. Beach Drive, Ocean Springs, MS 39564, USA
W. F. Font
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Box 814, Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, LA 70402, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Twelve populations of bats were examined to determine the extent of interspecific associations in determining the species richness of intestinal helminth infracommunities. The pool of helminth species which was available to individual bats ranged from 2 to 21. The ‘summed binomial’ distribution was determined to underlie the host frequency distribution of the number of helminth species per host. Overall covariation in occurrences of species in replicated communities can be detected by testing for the equality of the observed variance of the host frequency distribution to the variance expected when species are allocated to hosts at random. Where statistically significant the covariance was indicative of a majority of positive rather than negative interspecific associations. As the mean number of species per host in a host population increases not only does the number of positive associations increase but so does the proportion of species pairs which exhibit positive associations. Although there is an increase in the proportion of species pairs which exhibit positive associations as the number of species increases, the magnitude of the associations (as indicated by the mean positive or the mean negative pairwise covariances) does not. Therefore, we concluded that positive interactions are more common than negative interactions in determining the species richness of helminth infracommunities of bats. Further, positive associations become even more important as the community becomes more complex. However, the increased importance is derived from the number rather than the strength of the associations.

Keywords

Helminth communitiesbatsfrequency distributionsinterspecific associations

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 103 , Issue 1 , August 1991 , pp. 127 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

AbeleI., G. I., G. (1984). Biogeography, colonization, and experimental community structure of coral-associated crustaceans. In Ecological Communities: Conceptual Issues and the Evidence, (ed. Strong, D. R., Simberloff, D., Abele, L. G. & Thistle, A. B.), pp. 123–37. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, A. O. (1990). Helminth communities in avian hosts: determinants of pattern. In Parasite Communities: Patterns and Processes (ed. Esch, G. W., Bush, A. O. & Aho, J. M.), pp. 197–229. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, A. O. & Holmes, J. C. (1986 a). Intestinal helminths of lesser scaup ducks: patterns of association. Canadian Journal of Zoology 64, 132–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, A. O. & Holmes, J. C. (1986 b). Intestinal helminths of lesser scaup ducks: an interactive community. Canadian Journal of Zoology 64, 142–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, N. O., Nansen, P., Fagbemi, B. O. & Monrad, J. (1987). Heterologous antagonistic and synergistic interactions between helminths and between helminths and protozoans in concurrent experimental infection of mammalian hosts. Parasitology Research 73, 387–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, R. D. (1988). Chance and order in determining fish-species composition on small coral patches. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 115, 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, J. M. (1975). Assembly of species communities. In Ecology and Evolution of Communities (ed. Cody, M. L. & Diamond, J. M.), pp. 342–444. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dobson, A. P. (1990). Models for multi-species parasite–host communities. In Parasite Communities: Patterns and Processes, (ed. Esch, G. W., Bush, A. O. & Aho, J. M.), pp. 261–88. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feller, W. (1968). An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, 3rd edn, vol. 1. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Goater, T. M., Esch, G. W. & Bush, A. O. (1987). Helminth parasites of sympatric salamanders: ecological concepts of infracommunity, component and compound community levels. American Midland Naturalist 118, 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. R. & Bursey, C. R. (1990). Helminths of the Arizona little striped whiptail, Cnemidophorus inornatus arizonae, and the desert grassland whiptail, Cnemidophorus uniparens (Sauria: Teiidae), from southeastern Arizona. Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington 57, 83–6.Google Scholar
Grant, P. R. (1986). Ecology and Evolution of Darwin's Finches. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, C. A., Gray, P. N. & Pence, D. B. (1989). Influence of social status on the helminth community of late-winter mallards. Canadian Journal of Zoology 67, 1937–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastings, A. (1987). Can competition be detected using species co-occurrence data? Ecology 68, 117–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R. P. (1980). Interspecific interactions among gastrointestinal helminths in pikas of North America. American Midland Naturalist 103, 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffnagle, T. L., Cole, R. A. & Shoop, W. L. (1990). Gastrointestinal parasites of the blue catfish (Ictalurus furcatus) in Kentucky Lake, Tennessee. Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington 57, 40–3.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. C. & Price, P. W. (1986). Communities of parasites. In Community Ecology: Pattern and Process (ed. Kikkawa, J. & Anderson, D. J.), pp. 187–213. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Kennedy, C. R. (1990). Helminth communities in freshwater fish: structured communities or stochastic assemblages? In Parasite Communities: Patterns and Processes (ed. Esch, G. W., Bush, A. O. & Aho, J.M.), pp. 131–56. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, J. H. (1984). Non-competitive populations, non-convergent communities, and vacant niches: the herbivores of bracken. In Ecological Communities: Conceptual Issues and the Evidence (ed. Strong, D. R., Simberloff, D., Abele, L. G. & Thistle, A. B.), pp. 67–100. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, J. H. & Strong, D. R. (1981). Community patterns and competition in folivorous insects. American Naturalist 118, 317–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotz, J. M. & Font, W. F. (1985). Structure of enteric helminth communities in two populations of Eptesicus fuscus (Chiroptera). Canadian Journal of Zoology 63, 2969–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClure, M. S. & Price, P. W. (1975). Competition among sympatric Erythroneura leaf hoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) on American sycamore. Ecology 56, 1388–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCulloch, C. E. (1985). Variance tests for species associations. Ecology 66, 1676–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, G. F. (1979). Responses to infection with metazoan and protozoan parasites in mice. Advances in Immunology 28, 451–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, J. A. & Simberloff, D. (1990). Gastrointestinal helminth communities of bobwhite quail. Ecology 71, 344–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muzzal, P. M. (1990). Endoparasites of the red-backed salamander, Plethodon c. cinereus from southwestern Michigan. Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington 57, 165–7.Google Scholar
Nickel, P. A. & Hansen, M. F. (1967). Helminths of bats collected in Kansas, Nebraska, and Oklahoma. American Midland Naturalist 78, 481–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pence, D. B. (1990). Helminth community of mammalian hosts: concepts at the infracommunity, component and compound community levels. In Parasite Communities: Patterns and Processes (ed. Esch, G. W., Bush, A. O. & Aho, J. M.), pp. 233–60. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pence, D. B. & Windberg, L. A. (1984). Population dynamics across selected habitat variables of the helminth community in Coyotes Canis latrans, from south Texas. Journal of Parasitology 70, 735–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pielou, E. C. (1972). 2k contingency tables in ecology. Journal of Theoretical Biology 34, 337–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pielou, E. C. (1977). Mathematical Ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Robson, D. S. (1972). Statistical tests of significance. Journal of Theoretical Biology 34, 350–2.Google Scholar
Sale, P. F. & Dybdahl., R. (1975). Determinants of community structure for coral reef fishes in an experimental habitat. Ecology 56, 1343–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seifert, R. P. & Seifert, F. H. (1976). A community matrix analysis of Heliconia insect communities. American Naturalist 110, 461–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffner, L. C. (1990). Small-scale organism distributions and patterns of species diversity: evidence for positive interactions in an estuarine benthic community. Marine Ecology Progress Series 61, 107–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schluter, D. (1984). A variance test for detecting species associations, with some applications. Ecology 65, 998–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar