Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-s6l46 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T22:14:42.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the bidirectional relationship between geographic range and taxonomic duration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Michael Foote ,
James S. Crampton ,
Alan G. Beu  and
Roger A. Cooper
Michael Foote
Affiliation:
Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 5734 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637. E-mail: mfoote@uchicago.edu
James S. Crampton
Affiliation:
GNS Science, Post Office Box 30368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand. E-mail: j.crampton@gns.cri.nz
Alan G. Beu
Affiliation:
GNS Science, Post Office Box 30368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand. E-mail: E-mail: E-mail: a.beu@gns.cri.nz
Roger A. Cooper
Affiliation:
GNS Science, Post Office Box 30368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand. E-mail: r.cooper@gns.cri.nz.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Geographic range and taxonomic duration are known to be positively correlated in a number of biologic groups; this is usually attributed to the influence of range upon duration rather than the other way about. Here we analyze two distinct components of this correlation within species and genera of marine invertebrates and microfossils by partitioning the total duration into two parts: the time it takes a taxon to attain its maximum geographic range, and the time a taxon persists after attaining its peak range. We find that the longer it takes a taxon to attain its maximum geographic range, the wider is that range. We also find that the broader the maximum range, the greater is the duration after this maximum is attained. These two correlations are equally strong on average. There is thus a reciprocal relationship between duration and geographic range, and there is no compelling evidence that range generally determines duration more or less than duration determines range.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , Fall 2008 , pp. 421 - 433
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Alroy, J. In press. Speciation and extinction in the fossil record of North American mammals. In Butlin, R., Bridle, J., and Schluter, D., eds. Ecology and speciation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1977. Species richness in marine benthic habitats through the Phanerozoic. Paleobiology 3:152–167.Google Scholar
Beu, A. G., Maxwell, P. A., and Brazier, R. C. 1990. Cenozoic Mollusca of New Zealand. New Zealand Geological Survey Paleontological Bulletin 58:1–518.Google Scholar
Budd, A. F., and Johnson, K. G. 2001. Contrasting patterns in rare and abundant species during evolutionary turnover. Pp. 295–325 in Jackson, J. B. C., Lidgard, S., and McKinney, F. K., eds. Evolutionary patterns: growth, form, and tempo in the fossil record. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. A. 2004. The New Zealand geological timescale. Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Monograph 22:1–284.Google Scholar
Crampton, J. S., Foote, M., Beu, A. G., Maxwell, P. A., Cooper, R. A., Matcham, I., Marshall, B., and Jones, C. M. 2006. The ark was full! Constant to declining Cenozoic shallow marine biodiversity on an isolated midlatitude continent. Paleobiology 32:509–532.Google Scholar
Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R. J. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 125:1–15.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 2000. Origination and extinction components of taxonomic diversity: Paleozoic and post-Paleozoic dynamics. Paleobiology 26:578–605.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 2003. Origination and extinction through the Phanerozoic: a new approach. Journal of Geology 111:125–148.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 2005. Pulsed origination and extinction in the marine realm. Paleobiology 31:6–20.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 2007a. Extinction and quiescence in marine animal genera. Paleobiology 33:261–272.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 2007b. Symmetric waxing and waning of marine invertebrate genera. Paleobiology 33:517–529.Google Scholar
Foote, M., and Raup, D. M. 1996. Fossil preservation and the stratigraphic ranges of taxa. Paleobiology 22:121–140.Google Scholar
Foote, M., Crampton, J. S., Beu, A. G., Marshall, B. A., Cooper, R. A., Maxwell, P. A., and Matcham, I. 2007. Rise and fall of species occupancy in Cenozoic fossil mollusks. Science 318:1131–1134.Google Scholar
Gaston, K. J. 2003. The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gradstein, F. M., Ogg, J. G., and Smith, A. G., eds. 2004. A geologic time scale 2004. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hansen, T. A. 1980. Influence of larval dispersal and geographic distribution on species longevity in neogastropods. Paleobiology 6:193–207.Google Scholar
Harnik, P. G. 2007. Multiple factors in extinction risk: testing models of extinction selectivity in Eocene bivalves using path analysis. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs 39(6):369.Google Scholar
Hunt, G., Roy, K., and Jablonski, D. 2005. Species-level heritability reaffirmed: a comment on “On the heritability of geographic range sizes.” American Naturalist 166:129–135.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 1986a. Larval ecology and macroevolution in marine invertebrates. Bulletin of Marine Science 39:565–587.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 1986b. Background and mass extinctions: the alternation of macroevolutionary regimes. Science 231:129–133.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 1987. Heritability at the species level: analysis of geographic ranges of Cretaceous molluscs. Science 238:360–363.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 1988. Estimates of species duration: response. Science 240:969.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 2005. Mass extinctions and macroevolution. Paleobiology 31:192–210.Google Scholar
Jablonski, D. 2008. Species selection: theory and data. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 39 (in press).Google Scholar
Jablonski, D., and Hunt, G. 2006. Larval ecology, geographic range, and species survivorship in Cretaceous molluscs: organismic versus species-level explanations. American Naturalist 168:556–564.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. B. C. 1974. Biogeographic consequences of eurytopy and stenotopy among marine bivalves and their evolutionary significance. American Naturalist 108:541–560.Google Scholar
Jernvall, J., and Fortelius, M. 2004. Maintenance of trophic structure in fossil mammal communities: site occupancy and taxon resilience. American Naturalist 164:614–624.Google Scholar
Kiessling, W., and Aberhan, M. 2007. Geographical distribution and extinction risk: lessons from Triassic–Jurassic marine benthic organisms. Journal of Biogeography 34:1473–1489.Google Scholar
King, P. R. 2000. Tectonic reconstructions of New Zealand: 40 Ma to the present. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 43:611–638.Google Scholar
Liow, L.-H. 2007. Does versatility as measured by geographic range, bathymetric range and morphological variability contribute to taxon longevity? Global Ecology and Biogeography 16:117–128.Google Scholar
Liow, L.-H., and Stenseth, N. C. 2007. The rise and fall of species: implications for macroevolutionary and macroecological studies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 274:2745–2752.Google Scholar
Martinell, J., and Hoffman, A. 1983. Species duration patterns in the Pliocene gastropod fauna of Empordà (Northeast Spain). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Monatshefte 1983:698–704.Google Scholar
McKinney, M. L. 1997. Extinction vulnerability and selectivity: combining ecological and paleontological views. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28:495–516.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I. 1997. A new look at age and area: the geographic and environmental expansions of genera during the Ordovician Radiation. Paleobiology 23:410–419.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I., and Foote, M. 2003. Increased longevities of post-Paleozoic marine genera after mass extinctions. Science 302:1030–1032.Google Scholar
Paul, C. R. C. 1982. The adequacy of the fossil record. Pp. 75–117 in Joysey, K. A. and Friday, A. E., eds. Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction (Systematics Association Special Volume No. 21). Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Payne, J. L., and Finnegan, S. 2007. The effect of geographic range on extinction risk during background and mass extinction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104:10506–10511.Google Scholar
Peters, S. E. 2007. The problem with the Paleozoic. Paleobiology 33:165–181.Google Scholar
Powell, M. G. 2007. Geographic range and genus longevity of late Paleozoic brachiopods. Paleobiology 33:530–546.Google Scholar
Purvis, A., Jones, K. E., and Mace, G. M. 2000. Extinction. Bio-Essays 22:1123–1133.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2007. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (http://www.R-project.org).Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1985. Mathematical models of cladogenesis. Paleobiology 11:42–52.Google Scholar
Rode, A. L., and Lieberman, B. 2004. Using GIS to unlock the interactions between biogeography, environment, and evolution in Middle and Late Devonian brachiopods and bivalves. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 211:345–359.Google Scholar
Rohlf, F. J. 2006. A comment on phylogenetic correction. Evolution 60:1509–1515.Google Scholar
Russell, M. P., and Lindberg, D. R. 1988. Estimates of species duration. Science 240:969.Google Scholar
Scotese, C. R. 2008. PALEOMAP Project (http://www.scotese.com).Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1981. A factor analytic description of the Phanerozoic marine fossil record. Paleobiology 7:36–54.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr. 1984. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversification. III. Post-Paleozoic families and mass extinctions. Paleobiology 10:246–267.Google Scholar
Siegel, S., and Castellan, N. J. Jr. 1988. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1944. Tempo and mode in evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Smith, J. T., and Roy, K. 2006. Selectivity during background extinction: Plio-Pleistocene scallops in California. Paleobiology 32:408–416.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1979. Macroevolution, pattern, and process. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Wagner, P. J., Kosnik, M. A., and Lidgard, S. 2006. Abundance distributions imply elevated complexity of post-Paleozoic marine ecosystems. Science 314:1289–1292.Google Scholar
Willis, J. C. 1922. Age and area. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Willis, J. C. 1926. Age and area. Quarterly Review of Biology 1:553–571.Google Scholar