Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-fn92c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-27T04:04:06.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The neotenous origin of the pollen organ of the gymnosperm Cycadeoidea and implications for the origin of higher taxa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Benton M. Stidd
Benton M. Stidd*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL 61455
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Previous descriptions and interpretations of the Cycadeoidea pollen organ are followed by a new interpretation based upon its presumed neotenous condition. The sexually mature pollen organ represents a juvenile morphological condition that persisted into the adult stage of the organism and was inherited ultimately from a seed fern ancestor. The neotenous organ is considered to have come into existence abruptly and the altered morphology to have been achieved without an intervening series of intermediates. Abrupt establishment of higher taxa by heterochrony constitutes a mechanism capable of decoupling microevolutionary processes from macrevolutionary differences and poses a distinct challenge to current evolutionary theory.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , Spring 1980 , pp. 161 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Bock, W. J. 1970. Microevolutionary sequences as a fundamental concept in macroevolutionary models. Evolution. 24:704–722.Google Scholar
Briquet, J. 1897. Recherches sur les feuilles septées chez les Dicotylédones. Bull. Herb. Boissier 5:453–468.Google Scholar
Carson, H. L. 1975. The genetics of speciation at the diploid level. Am. Nat. 109:83–92.Google Scholar
Crepet, W. L. 1974. Investigations of North American Cycadeoids: The reproductive biology of Cycadeoidea . Palaeontographica B. 148:144–169.Google Scholar
Delevoryas, T. 1963. Investigations of North American Cycadeoids: Cones of Cycadeoidea . Am. J. Botany. 50:45–52.Google Scholar
Delevoryas, T. 1968. Investigations of North American Cycadeoids: structure, ontogeny and phylogenetic consideration of cones of Cycadeoidea. Palaeontographica B. 121:122–133.Google Scholar
Delevoryas, T. and Gould, R. E. 1973. Investigations of North American cycadeoids: Williamsonian cones from the Jurassic of Ouxaca, Mexico. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 15:27–42.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. and Gould, S. J. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In: Schopf, T. J. M., ed. Models in Paleobiology. Freeman, Cooper and Co.; San Francisco, Calif.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1977a. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1977b. The return of Hopeful Monsters. Nat. Hist. 86(6):22–30.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. and Eldredge, N. 1977. Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology. 3:115–151.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. R. 1970. Comparative development and morphological interpretation of ‘rachis-leaves’ in Umbelliferae. Pp. 101–125. In: Robson, N. K., Cutler, D. F. and Gregory, M., eds. New Research in plant anatomy, Suppl. 1 Bot. J. Linn. Soc. Vol. 63.Google Scholar
løvtrup, S. 1974. Epigenetics: a Treatise on Theoretical Biology. Wiley; New York.Google Scholar
Løvtrup, S. 1976. On the falsifiability of neo-Darwinism. Evol. Theory. 1:267–283.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. 1973. The Philosophy of Biology. Hutchinson Univ. Library; London.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1975. A theory of evolution above the species level. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 72:646–650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stebbins, G. L. 1974. Flowering Plants: Evolution above the Species Level. Harvard Univ. Press; Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Takhatjan, A. 1954. Essays on the Evolutionary Morphology of Plants. Leningrad Univ.; Leningrad.Google Scholar
Takhatjan, A. 1976. Neoteny and the origin of flowering plants. In: Beck, C. B., ed. Origin and Early Evolution of Angiosperms. Columbia Univ. Press; New York, N.Y. Google Scholar
Wieland, G. R. 1906. American Fossil Cycads. Carnegie Inst.; Washington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentine, J. W. and Campbell, C. H. 1975. Genetic regulation and the fossil record. Am. Sci. 63:673–680.Google Scholar
van Steenis, C. G. G. J. 1969. Plant speciation in Malesia, with special reference to the theory of non-adaptive saltatory evolution. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1:97–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R. A. 1971. Experimental and developmental studies of the fern sporophyte. Bot. Rev. 37:509–540.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. C., Bush, G. L., Case, S. M., and King, M. C. 1975. Social structuring of mammalian populations and rate of chromosomal evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 72:5061–5065.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. C. 1976. Gene regulation in evolution. In: Ayala, F. J., ed. Molecular Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Inc.; Sunderland, Mass.Google Scholar